Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

資生堂インタラクティブビューティー株式会社資生堂インタラクティブビューティー株式会社
VS
FISFIS
資生堂インタラクティブビューティー株式会社

資生堂インタラクティブビューティー株式会社

銀座7-5-5, 中央区, JP

Last Update: 25/02/2026

View Profile
751/1000Fair

資生堂グループのIT・DXを牽引する組織、資生堂インタラクティブビューティーです。 変化する環境に対応し、デジタルトランスフォーメーション(DX)を加速させ、資生堂ジャパンの事業モデルを革新していくことを目的に、2021年に誕生。 「資生堂と皆さま」、「リアルとデジタル」、「お客さま同士」といったさまざまな繋がりや関係性を、デジタル・テクノロジー×「ビューティー」の持つ力で革新していきます。

NAICS:5415
NAICS Definition:Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees:98
Subsidiaries:5
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
FIS

FIS

601 Riverside Ave, Jacksonville, FL, US, 32202

Last Update: 04/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.fisglobal.com/
799/1000Fair

Unlocking financial technology. Bringing the world’s money into harmony. At FIS, we advance the way the world pays, banks, and invests. With decades of expertise, we provide financial technology solutions to financial institutions, businesses, and developers. Headquart...

NAICS:5415
NAICS Definition:Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees:45,534
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
資生堂インタラクティブビューティー株式会社

資生堂インタラクティブビューティー株式会社

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
FIS

FIS

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for 資生堂インタラクティブビューティー株式会社 in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for FIS in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - 資生堂インタラクティブビューティー株式会社 (X = Date, Y = Severity)

資生堂インタラクティブビューティー株式会社 cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - FIS (X = Date, Y = Severity)

FIS cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
資生堂インタラクティブビューティー株式会社

資生堂インタラクティブビューティー株式会社

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
FIS

FIS

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
FIS454072625

FAQ

Between 資生堂インタラクティブビューティー株式会社 company and FIS company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between 資生堂インタラクティブビューティー株式会社 company and FIS company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between 資生堂インタラクティブビューティー株式会社 company and FIS company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between 資生堂インタラクティブビューティー株式会社 company and FIS company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between 資生堂インタラクティブビューティー株式会社 company and FIS company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between 資生堂インタラクティブビューティー株式会社 company and FIS company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between 資生堂インタラクティブビューティー株式会社 company and FIS company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between 資生堂インタラクティブビューティー株式会社 company and FIS company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between 資生堂インタラクティブビューティー株式会社 company and FIS company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between 資生堂インタラクティブビューティー株式会社 company and FIS company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between 資生堂インタラクティブビューティー株式会社 company and FIS company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between 資生堂インタラクティブビューティー株式会社 and FIS, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between 資生堂インタラクティブビューティー株式会社 and FIS, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - 資生堂インタラクティブビューティー株式会社 or FIS ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - 資生堂インタラクティブビューティー株式会社 or FIS ?
Between 資生堂インタラクティブビューティー株式会社 and FIS, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between 資生堂インタラクティブビューティー株式会社 and FIS, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-59723
SUMMARY

Cline is an autonomous coding agent as an SDK, IDE extension, or CLI assistant. Prior to 3.0.30, the Cline Hub dashboard server launched by the cline dashboard command accepts WebSocket connections on the /browser endpoint without validating the Origin header, and when ROOM_SECRET is unset for local 127.0.0.1 binds, isAuthorizedBrowserRequest() allows attacker-controlled websites to send desktopCommand frames that read workspace state, mutate MCP and provider settings, and trigger command execution when a provider or model is configured. This issue is fixed in version 3.0.30.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
CVE-2026-54784
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. In version 1.9.0, CoreWCF SPNEGO SecurityContextToken negotiation can expose the proof key recovered from the RSTR when TransportWithMessageCredential with Windows client credentials and session establishment are used, allowing an observer to impersonate the authenticated Windows principal and decrypt or forge WS-SecureConversation traffic. This issue is fixed in version 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54783
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF WS-Security endorsing and supporting signature verification does not ensure the selected ds:Signature covers the expected Security header target, allowing an attacker with one captured signed SOAP envelope to replay arbitrary service operations as the victim principal. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54782
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML 1.1 and SAML 2.0 token validation does not correctly resolve the issuer signing key or require signed tokens when IdentityConfiguration is used with federated bindings, allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to impersonate any principal the trusted STS could issue. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-54781
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML token validation does not enforce SubjectConfirmation method URIs or holder-of-key proof keys in SamlSecurityTokenHandler, allowing holder-of-key downgrade or custom confirmation method assertions to authenticate a subject without proving authority over the assertion. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2