Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

資生堂インタラクティブビューティー株式会社資生堂インタラクティブビューティー株式会社
VS
Amazon Web Services (AWS)Amazon Web Services (AWS)
資生堂インタラクティブビューティー株式会社

資生堂インタラクティブビューティー株式会社

銀座7-5-5, 中央区, JP

Last Update: 25/02/2026

View Profile
751/1000Fair

資生堂グループのIT・DXを牽引する組織、資生堂インタラクティブビューティーです。 変化する環境に対応し、デジタルトランスフォーメーション(DX)を加速させ、資生堂ジャパンの事業モデルを革新していくことを目的に、2021年に誕生。 「資生堂と皆さま」、「リアルとデジタル」、「お客さま同士」といったさまざまな繋がりや関係性を、デジタル・テクノロジー×「ビューティー」の持つ力で革新していきます。

NAICS:5415
NAICS Definition:Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees:98
Subsidiaries:5
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Amazon Web Services (AWS)

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

410 Terry Ave N, Seattle, 98019, US

Last Update: 27/06/2026

View Profile
Between 550 and 599
http://aws.amazon.com
584/1000Very Poor

Launched in 2006, Amazon Web Services (AWS) began exposing key infrastructure services to businesses in the form of web services -- now widely known as cloud computing. The ultimate benefit of cloud computing, and AWS, is the ability to leverage a new business model and...

NAICS:5415
NAICS Definition:Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees:148,035
Subsidiaries:95
12-month incidents
19
Known data breaches
4
Attack type number
5

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
資生堂インタラクティブビューティー株式会社

資生堂インタラクティブビューティー株式会社

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Amazon Web Services (AWS)

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for 資生堂インタラクティブビューティー株式会社 in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

Amazon Web Services (AWS) has 1692.45% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - 資生堂インタラクティブビューティー株式会社 (X = Date, Y = Severity)

資生堂インタラクティブビューティー株式会社 cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Amazon Web Services (AWS) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Amazon Web Services (AWS) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
資生堂インタラクティブビューティー株式会社

資生堂インタラクティブビューティー株式会社

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Amazon Web Services (AWS)

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
AMA1782541446
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
HEAAMA1782153018
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
GOOAMA1781166643

FAQ

Between 資生堂インタラクティブビューティー株式会社 company and Amazon Web Services (AWS) company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between 資生堂インタラクティブビューティー株式会社 company and Amazon Web Services (AWS) company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between 資生堂インタラクティブビューティー株式会社 company and Amazon Web Services (AWS) company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between 資生堂インタラクティブビューティー株式会社 company and Amazon Web Services (AWS) company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between 資生堂インタラクティブビューティー株式会社 company and Amazon Web Services (AWS) company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between 資生堂インタラクティブビューティー株式会社 company and Amazon Web Services (AWS) company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between 資生堂インタラクティブビューティー株式会社 company and Amazon Web Services (AWS) company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between 資生堂インタラクティブビューティー株式会社 company and Amazon Web Services (AWS) company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between 資生堂インタラクティブビューティー株式会社 company and Amazon Web Services (AWS) company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between 資生堂インタラクティブビューティー株式会社 company and Amazon Web Services (AWS) company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between 資生堂インタラクティブビューティー株式会社 company and Amazon Web Services (AWS) company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between 資生堂インタラクティブビューティー株式会社 and Amazon Web Services (AWS), which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between 資生堂インタラクティブビューティー株式会社 and Amazon Web Services (AWS), which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - 資生堂インタラクティブビューティー株式会社 or Amazon Web Services (AWS) ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - 資生堂インタラクティブビューティー株式会社 or Amazon Web Services (AWS) ?
Between 資生堂インタラクティブビューティー株式会社 and Amazon Web Services (AWS), which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between 資生堂インタラクティブビューティー株式会社 and Amazon Web Services (AWS), which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-59858
SUMMARY

Vim is an open source, command line text editor. Prior to 9.2.0735, the C omni-completion script in runtime/autoload/ccomplete.vim interpolates the typeref: or typename: extension field of a tags entry, without escaping, into a :vimgrep pattern that is run through :execute. Because :vimgrep honors the bar as a command separator, a crafted tag field can close the search pattern and append an arbitrary Ex command; opening a hostile .c file whose project tags file contains such an entry and invoking C omni-completion runs that command as the editing user. This issue is fixed in version 9.2.0735.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-09
UPDATED
Date2026-07-09
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-59857
SUMMARY

Vim is an open source, command line text editor. Prior to 9.2.0725, the single-byte branch of spell_soundfold_sal() in src/spell.c translates a word through a spell file's SAL sound-folding rules into a caller-owned result buffer, but its result writes are guarded with reslen < MAXWLEN, allowing reslen to reach MAXWLEN before res[reslen] = NUL writes one byte past the end of the MAXWLEN-element stack buffer. A boundary-length word passed to soundfold(), or reached via sound-based spell suggestion while a SAL-based spell language is active under a non-multibyte 8-bit encoding, can corrupt the eval_soundfold() stack frame and crash the editor. This issue is fixed in version 9.2.0725.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-09
UPDATED
Date2026-07-09
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:A/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-59856
SUMMARY

Vim is an open source, command line text editor. Prior to 9.2.0736, the PHP omni-completion script in runtime/autoload/phpcomplete.vim interpolates a class or trait name, taken from the contents of the edited buffer, into a search() pattern that is run via win_execute() without escaping. A name containing a single quote can terminate the search() string argument early, and because the bar is honored as an Ex command separator, the remainder of the name is run as Ex commands; via the :! command this allows arbitrary operating-system command execution when a victim opens a crafted PHP file and invokes omni-completion. This issue is fixed in version 9.2.0736.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-09
UPDATED
Date2026-07-09
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-59855
SUMMARY

SiYuan is an open-source personal knowledge management system. Prior to 3.7.1, Asset.render in app/src/asset/index.ts interpolates the unsanitized this.path value into HTML assigned to innerHTML, allowing a crafted asset link containing a double quote to break out of the src attribute, inject an event handler, and execute JavaScript that can run OS commands in the Electron renderer. This issue is fixed in versions 3.7.1-alpha.2 and 3.7.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-09
UPDATED
Date2026-07-09
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-59854
SUMMARY

SiYuan is an open-source personal knowledge management system. Prior to 3.7.1, POST /api/file/globalCopyFiles accepts attacker-supplied absolute source paths and relies on util.IsSensitivePath in kernel/util/path.go, whose denylist misses common home-directory credential files such as .git-credentials, .netrc, .pgpass, .kube/config, .docker/config.json, and .gnupg, allowing an authenticated administrator or API-token user to copy those files into the workspace and exfiltrate them through the file API. This issue is fixed in versions 3.7.1-alpha.2 and 3.7.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-09
UPDATED
Date2026-07-09
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.2