Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

ShipMonkShipMonk
VS
ArvatoArvato
ShipMonk

ShipMonk

201 NW 22nd Ave, Fort Lauderdale, 33311, US

Last Update: 04/09/2026

View Profile
Between 600 and 649
https://www.shipmonk.com
619/1000Poor

Since 2014, ShipMonk has operated with a singular guiding principle: help ecommerce brands scale through technology-driven fulfillment solutions that enable entrepreneurs to devote more time to the things that matter most in their businesses. Put simply, here at ShipMon...

NAICS:47
NAICS Definition:Transportation and Warehousing
Employees:1,300
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
2
Known data breaches
3
Attack type number
1
Arvato

Arvato

Reinhard-Mohn-Str., Gütersloh, DE, 33333

Last Update: 14/09/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://arvato.com/
775/1000Fair

𝗪𝗲 𝘀𝗵𝗮𝗽𝗲 𝘀𝘂𝗽𝗽𝗹𝘆 𝗰𝗵𝗮𝗶𝗻𝘀 𝗴𝗹𝗼𝗯𝗮𝗹𝗹𝘆 Logistics seems so simple – just goods in, goods out. For us there is so much more to it. By combining deep industry expertise with the right technologies, we develop innovative supply chain management and e-c...

NAICS:47
NAICS Definition:Transportation and Warehousing
Employees:12,497
Subsidiaries:36
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
ShipMonk

ShipMonk

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Arvato

Arvato

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Transportation, Logistics, Supply Chain and Storage Industry Avg (This Year)

ShipMonk has 43.88% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incidents vs Transportation, Logistics, Supply Chain and Storage Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Arvato in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - ShipMonk (X = Date, Y = Severity)

ShipMonk cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Arvato (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Arvato cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
ShipMonk

ShipMonk

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
SAF1786970142
🔒 Incident : Breach
TRESHI1786631044
🔒 Incident : Breach
SHITRE1788524875
Arvato

Arvato

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between ShipMonk company and Arvato company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between ShipMonk company and Arvato company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between ShipMonk company and Arvato company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between ShipMonk company and Arvato company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between ShipMonk company and Arvato company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between ShipMonk company and Arvato company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between ShipMonk company and Arvato company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between ShipMonk company and Arvato company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between ShipMonk company and Arvato company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between ShipMonk company and Arvato company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between ShipMonk company and Arvato company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between ShipMonk and Arvato, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between ShipMonk and Arvato, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - ShipMonk or Arvato ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - ShipMonk or Arvato ?
Between ShipMonk and Arvato, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between ShipMonk and Arvato, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-97626
SUMMARY

Requesting a user or organization profile page (`GET /{username}`) with an `Accept: application/rss+xml` or `Accept: application/atom+xml` header returned the owner's activity feed without the visibility check that the profile page and the `.rss` and `.atom` routes apply. Anonymous users, restricted users and non-members could confirm the existence of limited or private users and private organizations and read their profile details and public activity, also when `[other] ENABLE_FEED` was disabled. Activity in private repositories was not included.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-97208
SUMMARY

The Gitea API endpoint for creating push mirrors (`POST /api/v1/repos/{owner}/{repo}/push_mirrors`) checked only whether mirroring was enabled and not the `[mirror] DISABLE_NEW_PUSH` setting that the web interface enforces. A repository administrator could therefore create new push mirrors on instances where the site administrator had disabled them. A push mirror pushes all refs of the repository to a remote chosen by the caller, on each commit or on a schedule.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-96594
SUMMARY

The Gitea API endpoint `GET /api/v1/repos/{owner}/{repo}/media/{filepath}` wrote files of up to 1 KiB that are stored directly in Git, not in LFS, to the response without the content type and disposition headers Gitea uses for user content. An HTML file committed to a repository was therefore rendered by the browser on the Gitea origin. A user who can push to a repository could run JavaScript in the session of a victim who opens the media URL and act with the victim's permissions.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-89182
SUMMARY

With `[repository] FORCE_PRIVATE = true`, Gitea creates new repositories as private, but the post-receive hook still applied the `repo.private=false` push option to an empty repository created by push. Any user who can create repositories could make their new repository public in violation of the instance policy. The default configuration is not affected.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-86684
SUMMARY

The Gitea push mirror API checked whether the repository owner, instead of the requesting user, may use local file system paths. On instances with `[security] IMPORT_LOCAL_PATHS = true`, a repository administrator who is not allowed to import local paths could add a push mirror to a local path on the server when the repository owner has that permission. Gitea then pushed the repository's refs into an existing Git repository at that path with the permissions of the Gitea process.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA