Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

ShipAccel, Powered by Pitney BowesShipAccel, Powered by Pitney Bowes
VS
BoltBolt
ShipAccel, Powered by Pitney Bowes

ShipAccel, Powered by Pitney Bowes

N/A

Last Update: 20/02/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.shipaccel.com/
769/1000Fair

We turbocharge ecommerce businesses of all sizes with the leading smart shipping solution to help you scale your business with ease.

NAICS:5112
NAICS Definition:Software Publishers
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Bolt

Bolt

Tallinn, EE

Last Update: 22/04/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://bolt.eu
711/1000Moderate

At Bolt, we're building a future where people don’t need to own personal cars to move around safely and conveniently. A future where people have the freedom to use transport on demand, choosing whatever vehicle's best for each occasion — be it a car, scooter, or e-bike....

NAICS:5112
NAICS Definition:Software Publishers
Employees:14,599
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
ShipAccel, Powered by Pitney Bowes

ShipAccel, Powered by Pitney Bowes

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Bolt

Bolt

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for ShipAccel, Powered by Pitney Bowes in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)

Bolt has 2.91% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - ShipAccel, Powered by Pitney Bowes (X = Date, Y = Severity)

ShipAccel, Powered by Pitney Bowes cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Bolt (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Bolt cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
ShipAccel, Powered by Pitney Bowes

ShipAccel, Powered by Pitney Bowes

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Bolt

Bolt

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
BOL1776825169

FAQ

Between ShipAccel, Powered by Pitney Bowes company and Bolt company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between ShipAccel, Powered by Pitney Bowes company and Bolt company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between ShipAccel, Powered by Pitney Bowes company and Bolt company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between ShipAccel, Powered by Pitney Bowes company and Bolt company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between ShipAccel, Powered by Pitney Bowes company and Bolt company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between ShipAccel, Powered by Pitney Bowes company and Bolt company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between ShipAccel, Powered by Pitney Bowes company and Bolt company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between ShipAccel, Powered by Pitney Bowes company and Bolt company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between ShipAccel, Powered by Pitney Bowes company and Bolt company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between ShipAccel, Powered by Pitney Bowes company and Bolt company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between ShipAccel, Powered by Pitney Bowes company and Bolt company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between ShipAccel, Powered by Pitney Bowes and Bolt, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between ShipAccel, Powered by Pitney Bowes and Bolt, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - ShipAccel, Powered by Pitney Bowes or Bolt ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - ShipAccel, Powered by Pitney Bowes or Bolt ?
Between ShipAccel, Powered by Pitney Bowes and Bolt, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between ShipAccel, Powered by Pitney Bowes and Bolt, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-8325
SUMMARY

A maliciously crafted PDF file, when parsed through Autodesk Revit, can force an Out-of-Bounds Write vulnerability. A malicious actor may leverage this vulnerability to cause a crash, cause data corruption, or execute arbitrary code in the context of the current process.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-06
UPDATED
Date2026-08-06
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-7867
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in udisks2. A local attacker with an active console session can exploit insufficient authorization checking on the 'as-user' option in the org.freedesktop.UDisks2.Filesystem.Mount() D-Bus method. This allows the attacker to spoof the 'as-user' parameter, mounting filesystems on behalf of arbitrary users, including privileged accounts. This can lead to local privilege escalation through mount point injection and manipulation of the mount namespace visible to privileged users.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-06
UPDATED
Date2026-08-06
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-7406
SUMMARY

A maliciously crafted BMP file, when parsed through certain Autodesk products, can force a Untrusted Pointer Dereference vulnerability. A malicious actor can leverage this vulnerability to execute arbitrary code in the context of the current process.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-06
UPDATED
Date2026-08-06
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-7405
SUMMARY

A maliciously crafted TIF file, when parsed through certain Autodesk products during image import, can cause an Out-of-Bounds Read in the image handling library. A malicious actor can leverage this vulnerability to cause a denial of service

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-06
UPDATED
Date2026-08-06
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-71555
SUMMARY

PILOS (Platform for Interactive Live-Online Seminars) is a frontend for BigBlueButton. From 2.1.0 until 4.14.1, PILOS does not send a Cross-Origin-Opener-Policy response header, so pages opened by PILOS via a link that opens a new browsing context (e.g., target="_blank") retain a window.opener reference back to the originating PILOS tab. A malicious destination page reached this way can use window.opener to navigate or manipulate the original PILOS tab, a technique known as reverse tabnabbing, potentially redirecting an authenticated user to a phishing page that mimics PILOS. This issue is fixed in version 4.14.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-06
UPDATED
Date2026-08-06
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.3