Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Shield HealthCare - Medical Supplies for Care at Home Since 1957Shield HealthCare - Medical Supplies for Care at Home Since 1957
VS
StrykerStryker
Shield HealthCare - Medical Supplies for Care at Home Since 1957

Shield HealthCare - Medical Supplies for Care at Home Since 1957

27911 Franklin Parkway, Valencia, 91355, US

Last Update: 05/04/2026

View Profile
648/1000Poor

With 65 years of medical supply experience, Shield is a leading provider of incontinence, urological, enteral nutrition, advanced wound care, diabetes and ostomy supplies. Our mission is to serve the medical supply needs of patients at home with excellence, compassion a...

NAICS:3391
NAICS Definition:Medical Equipment and Supplies Manufacturing
Employees:483
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
Stryker

Stryker

2825 Airview Boulevard, Kalamazoo, 49002, US

Last Update: 08/07/2026

View Profile
Between 0 and 549
http://www.stryker.com
477/1000Critical

Stryker is a global leader in medical technologies and, together with our customers, we are driven to make healthcare better. We offer innovative products and services in MedSurg, Neurotechnology and Orthopaedics that help improve patient and healthcare outcomes. Alongs...

NAICS:3391
NAICS Definition:Medical Equipment and Supplies Manufacturing
Employees:51,473
Subsidiaries:26
12-month incidents
14
Known data breaches
4
Attack type number
2

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Shield HealthCare - Medical Supplies for Care at Home Since 1957

Shield HealthCare - Medical Supplies for Care at Home Since 1957

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Stryker

Stryker

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Medical Equipment Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Shield HealthCare - Medical Supplies for Care at Home Since 1957 in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Medical Equipment Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

Stryker has 1220.75% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - Shield HealthCare - Medical Supplies for Care at Home Since 1957 (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Shield HealthCare - Medical Supplies for Care at Home Since 1957 cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Stryker (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Stryker cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Shield HealthCare - Medical Supplies for Care at Home Since 1957

Shield HealthCare - Medical Supplies for Care at Home Since 1957

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
SHI1765420730
Stryker

Stryker

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
STR1779337852
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
STR1779452900
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
DOWSTR1775838732

FAQ

Between Shield HealthCare - Medical Supplies for Care at Home Since 1957 company and Stryker company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Shield HealthCare - Medical Supplies for Care at Home Since 1957 company and Stryker company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Shield HealthCare - Medical Supplies for Care at Home Since 1957 company and Stryker company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Shield HealthCare - Medical Supplies for Care at Home Since 1957 company and Stryker company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Shield HealthCare - Medical Supplies for Care at Home Since 1957 company and Stryker company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Shield HealthCare - Medical Supplies for Care at Home Since 1957 company and Stryker company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Shield HealthCare - Medical Supplies for Care at Home Since 1957 company and Stryker company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Shield HealthCare - Medical Supplies for Care at Home Since 1957 company and Stryker company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Shield HealthCare - Medical Supplies for Care at Home Since 1957 company and Stryker company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Shield HealthCare - Medical Supplies for Care at Home Since 1957 company and Stryker company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Shield HealthCare - Medical Supplies for Care at Home Since 1957 company and Stryker company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Shield HealthCare - Medical Supplies for Care at Home Since 1957 and Stryker, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Shield HealthCare - Medical Supplies for Care at Home Since 1957 and Stryker, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Shield HealthCare - Medical Supplies for Care at Home Since 1957 or Stryker ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Shield HealthCare - Medical Supplies for Care at Home Since 1957 or Stryker ?
Between Shield HealthCare - Medical Supplies for Care at Home Since 1957 and Stryker, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Shield HealthCare - Medical Supplies for Care at Home Since 1957 and Stryker, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-58281
SUMMARY

Deserialization of untrusted data in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-11
UPDATED
Date2026-07-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.3
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.6
CVE-2026-10660
SUMMARY

The Bluetooth BAP Broadcast Assistant GATT client in subsys/bluetooth/audio/bap_broadcast_assistant.c reassembled remote Broadcast Receive State data into a single file-static net_buf_simple (att_buf, BT_ATT_MAX_ATTRIBUTE_LEN = 512 bytes) shared by all connection instances, while the BUSY flag, long-read handle, and reset/offset state were per-connection. When the device acts as a Broadcast Assistant connected to multiple Scan Delegator peripherals, notification and long-read callbacks from different connections interleave on the shared buffer: the append in notify_handler (net_buf_simple_add_mem at the not-busy branch) performs no tailroom check, so receive-state notifications from two or more delegators accumulate on the same 512-byte buffer and, with a sufficiently large configured ATT MTU (BT_L2CAP_TX_MTU up to 2000) and two-to-three concurrent connections, write past the buffer into adjacent .bss (net_buf_simple_add only asserts in debug builds). Even below the overflow threshold, one connection's net_buf_simple_reset zeroes the shared length while another connection's reassembly and GATT read offset are in flight, mixing one peer's data into another's parse. A malicious or compromised Scan Delegator (or two colluding peers) over BLE can trigger this, causing out-of-bounds writes (memory corruption / denial of service) and cross-connection data corruption. The fix moves the buffer into the per-connection instance struct so each connection reassembles into its own buffer. Affects Zephyr releases shipping the Broadcast Assistant with the shared buffer, including v4.4.0 and earlier.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-11
UPDATED
Date2026-07-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
4.7
EXPLOITABILITY
1.6
CVE-2026-61870
SUMMARY

ImageMagick before 7.1.2-26 contains a memory leak vulnerability in the VIFF encoder when memory allocation fails. Attackers can trigger allocation failures by processing specially crafted VIFF images to exhaust available memory and cause denial of service.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-11
UPDATED
Date2026-07-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 2.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 2.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
CVSS4
Base Score: 2.1
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:H/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
1.4
CVE-2026-61861
SUMMARY

ImageMagick before 7.1.2-26 contains a use-after-free vulnerability in the FormatMagickCaption method when memory allocation fails. Attackers can trigger memory allocation failures to cause a dangling pointer to reference freed memory, potentially enabling denial of service or code execution.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-11
UPDATED
Date2026-07-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.7
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.3
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-61858
SUMMARY

ImageMagick before 7.1.2-26 contains a policy bypass vulnerability in the APNG encoder and external delegates due to missing validation checks. Attackers can write files to disallowed paths by bypassing configured policy restrictions through the APNG encoding process.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-11
UPDATED
Date2026-07-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 4.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8