Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Sherwin-Williams Protective & Marine CoatingsSherwin-Williams Protective & Marine Coatings
VS
Sherwin-WilliamsSherwin-Williams
Sherwin-Williams Protective & Marine Coatings

Sherwin-Williams Protective & Marine Coatings

101 W Prospect Ave, Cleveland, US

Last Update: 06/05/2026

View Profile
763/1000Fair

The Sherwin-Williams Protective & Marine division delivers world-class industry subject matter expertise, unparalleled technical and specification service, and unmatched regional commercial team support to customers around the globe. Deploying a team of highly experienc...

NAICS:3255
NAICS Definition:Paint, Coating, and Adhesive Manufacturing
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:9
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Sherwin-Williams

Sherwin-Williams

101 Prospect Avenue N.E., Cleveland, 44101, US

Last Update: 07/09/2026

View Profile
820/1000Good

Our mission began more than 150 years ago in 1866 when Henry Sherwin and Edward Williams founded the company in Cleveland, Ohio. The duo went on to shape an industry and create a global legacy. That legacy continues on today as we look ahead and continue to innovate our...

NAICS:3255
NAICS Definition:Paint, Coating, and Adhesive Manufacturing
Employees:49,043
Subsidiaries:7
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Sherwin-Williams Protective & Marine Coatings

Sherwin-Williams Protective & Marine Coatings

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Sherwin-Williams

Sherwin-Williams

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Paint, Coating, and Adhesive Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Sherwin-Williams Protective & Marine Coatings in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Paint, Coating, and Adhesive Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Sherwin-Williams in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Sherwin-Williams Protective & Marine Coatings (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Sherwin-Williams Protective & Marine Coatings cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Sherwin-Williams (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Sherwin-Williams cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Sherwin-Williams Protective & Marine Coatings

Sherwin-Williams Protective & Marine Coatings

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Sherwin-Williams

Sherwin-Williams

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Sherwin-Williams Protective & Marine Coatings company and Sherwin-Williams company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Sherwin-Williams Protective & Marine Coatings company and Sherwin-Williams company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Sherwin-Williams Protective & Marine Coatings company and Sherwin-Williams company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Sherwin-Williams Protective & Marine Coatings company and Sherwin-Williams company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Sherwin-Williams Protective & Marine Coatings company and Sherwin-Williams company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Sherwin-Williams Protective & Marine Coatings company and Sherwin-Williams company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Sherwin-Williams Protective & Marine Coatings company and Sherwin-Williams company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Sherwin-Williams Protective & Marine Coatings company and Sherwin-Williams company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Sherwin-Williams Protective & Marine Coatings company and Sherwin-Williams company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Sherwin-Williams Protective & Marine Coatings company and Sherwin-Williams company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Sherwin-Williams Protective & Marine Coatings company and Sherwin-Williams company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Sherwin-Williams Protective & Marine Coatings and Sherwin-Williams, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Sherwin-Williams Protective & Marine Coatings and Sherwin-Williams, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Sherwin-Williams Protective & Marine Coatings or Sherwin-Williams ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Sherwin-Williams Protective & Marine Coatings or Sherwin-Williams ?
Between Sherwin-Williams Protective & Marine Coatings and Sherwin-Williams, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Sherwin-Williams Protective & Marine Coatings and Sherwin-Williams, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-97626
SUMMARY

Requesting a user or organization profile page (`GET /{username}`) with an `Accept: application/rss+xml` or `Accept: application/atom+xml` header returned the owner's activity feed without the visibility check that the profile page and the `.rss` and `.atom` routes apply. Anonymous users, restricted users and non-members could confirm the existence of limited or private users and private organizations and read their profile details and public activity, also when `[other] ENABLE_FEED` was disabled. Activity in private repositories was not included.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-97208
SUMMARY

The Gitea API endpoint for creating push mirrors (`POST /api/v1/repos/{owner}/{repo}/push_mirrors`) checked only whether mirroring was enabled and not the `[mirror] DISABLE_NEW_PUSH` setting that the web interface enforces. A repository administrator could therefore create new push mirrors on instances where the site administrator had disabled them. A push mirror pushes all refs of the repository to a remote chosen by the caller, on each commit or on a schedule.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-96594
SUMMARY

The Gitea API endpoint `GET /api/v1/repos/{owner}/{repo}/media/{filepath}` wrote files of up to 1 KiB that are stored directly in Git, not in LFS, to the response without the content type and disposition headers Gitea uses for user content. An HTML file committed to a repository was therefore rendered by the browser on the Gitea origin. A user who can push to a repository could run JavaScript in the session of a victim who opens the media URL and act with the victim's permissions.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-89182
SUMMARY

With `[repository] FORCE_PRIVATE = true`, Gitea creates new repositories as private, but the post-receive hook still applied the `repo.private=false` push option to an empty repository created by push. Any user who can create repositories could make their new repository public in violation of the instance policy. The default configuration is not affected.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-86684
SUMMARY

The Gitea push mirror API checked whether the repository owner, instead of the requesting user, may use local file system paths. On instances with `[security] IMPORT_LOCAL_PATHS = true`, a repository administrator who is not allowed to import local paths could add a push mirror to a local path on the server when the repository owner has that permission. Gitea then pushed the repository's refs into an existing Git repository at that path with the permissions of the Gitea process.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA