Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Sheldahl Flexible Technologies, A Flex CompanySheldahl Flexible Technologies, A Flex Company
VS
HaierHaier
Sheldahl Flexible Technologies, A Flex Company

Sheldahl Flexible Technologies, A Flex Company

1150 Sheldahl Rd, Northfield, Minnesota, 55057, US

Last Update: 03/11/2025

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.sheldahl.com
747/1000Moderate

From complicated flexible circuits for the automotive industry to creating the heat shield material for the James Webb telescope, Sheldahl® has decades of experience innovating custom solutions to meet customer needs. Our design and technical team, quality managers and...

NAICS:335
NAICS Definition:Electrical Equipment, Appliance, and Component Manufacturing
Employees:85
Subsidiaries:6
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Haier

Haier

1 Haier Rd, Laoshan District., Qingdao, 266103, CN

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.haier.com
776/1000Fair

Established in 1984, Haier Group is a world-leading provider of solutions to better life. Focusing on user experience, Haier has been included on the list of BrandZ™ Top 100 Most Valuable Global Brands for two consecutive years as the world’s first and only IoT ecosyste...

NAICS:335
NAICS Definition:Electrical Equipment, Appliance, and Component Manufacturing
Employees:18,744
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Sheldahl Flexible Technologies, A Flex Company

Sheldahl Flexible Technologies, A Flex Company

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Haier

Haier

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Appliances, Electrical, and Electronics Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Sheldahl Flexible Technologies, A Flex Company in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Appliances, Electrical, and Electronics Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Haier in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Sheldahl Flexible Technologies, A Flex Company (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Sheldahl Flexible Technologies, A Flex Company cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Haier (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Haier cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Sheldahl Flexible Technologies, A Flex Company

Sheldahl Flexible Technologies, A Flex Company

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Haier

Haier

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Sheldahl Flexible Technologies, A Flex Company company and Haier company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Sheldahl Flexible Technologies, A Flex Company company and Haier company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Sheldahl Flexible Technologies, A Flex Company company and Haier company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Sheldahl Flexible Technologies, A Flex Company company and Haier company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Sheldahl Flexible Technologies, A Flex Company company and Haier company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Sheldahl Flexible Technologies, A Flex Company company and Haier company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Sheldahl Flexible Technologies, A Flex Company company and Haier company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Sheldahl Flexible Technologies, A Flex Company company and Haier company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Sheldahl Flexible Technologies, A Flex Company company and Haier company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Sheldahl Flexible Technologies, A Flex Company company and Haier company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Sheldahl Flexible Technologies, A Flex Company company and Haier company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Sheldahl Flexible Technologies, A Flex Company and Haier, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Sheldahl Flexible Technologies, A Flex Company and Haier, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Sheldahl Flexible Technologies, A Flex Company or Haier ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Sheldahl Flexible Technologies, A Flex Company or Haier ?
Between Sheldahl Flexible Technologies, A Flex Company and Haier, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Sheldahl Flexible Technologies, A Flex Company and Haier, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-66064
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/handler.go sendFile handler opened files using a cleaned path but derived the authorization filename from raw req.URL.Path, so a trailing slash could bypass .goshs ACL-file protection and block-list checks. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-66063
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/updown.go multipart upload handler split part.FileName() on / but did not reject .., allowing an unauthenticated upload with filename .. to create a file outside the served tree. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-64863
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.4, the httpserver/server.go wdGuard handled WebDAV MOVE as a write-only method and did not enforce --no-delete, allowing WebDAV clients to delete or overwrite files via MOVE with Overwrite: T. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-62325
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. From 2.1.3 until 2.1.4, the sftpserver/sftpserver.go password handler used Username != "" && Password != "", so running goshs with -b 'admin:' -sftp and no -fkf left both SFTP authentication handlers unset and allowed unauthenticated file access. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-59921
SUMMARY

Netty is an asynchronous, event-driven network application framework. Prior to versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final, HttpPostRequestEncoder constructs multipart HTTP request bodies by directly concatenating user-supplied filenames and field names into Content-Disposition MIME headers without validating or sanitizing CRLF characters (\r\n). Since MIME headers are delimited by CRLF, an attacker who controls the filename can inject arbitrary MIME headers into the multipart body part. The root cause is that neither the encoder nor the FileUpload implementations' setFilename() methods, which only check for null, neutralize CRLF characters before the filename is embedded into the header. This issue has been fixed in versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1