Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Shaw’s and Star MarketShaw’s and Star Market
VS
El Corte InglésEl Corte Inglés
Shaw’s and Star Market

Shaw’s and Star Market

750 W Center St, West Bridgewater, Massachusetts, US, 02379

Last Update: 17/02/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.shaws.com
779/1000Fair

Shaw’s and Star Market boast a rich history rooted in the small towns and historical cities of New England. Shaw’s, one of the oldest continuously operating food retailers in the United States, has its origins dating back to 1860. Star Market, a premier food retailer, h...

NAICS:43
NAICS Definition:Retail Trade
Employees:4,346
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
El Corte Inglés

El Corte Inglés

Hermosilla, 112, Madrid, 28009, ES

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile

El Corte Inglés is a world leader in large department stores and a benchmark of Spanish distribution. With more than 70 years'​ experience, the Group has maintained from the outset a policy of customer service and an ongoing concern with adapting itself to suit the ...

NAICS:43
NAICS Definition:Retail Trade
Employees:36,352
Subsidiaries:3
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Shaw’s and Star Market

Shaw’s and Star Market

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
El Corte Inglés

El Corte Inglés

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Retail Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Shaw’s and Star Market in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Retail Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for El Corte Inglés in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Shaw’s and Star Market (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Shaw’s and Star Market cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - El Corte Inglés (X = Date, Y = Severity)

El Corte Inglés cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Shaw’s and Star Market

Shaw’s and Star Market

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
El Corte Inglés

El Corte Inglés

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Shaw’s and Star Market company and El Corte Inglés company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Shaw’s and Star Market company and El Corte Inglés company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Shaw’s and Star Market company and El Corte Inglés company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Shaw’s and Star Market company and El Corte Inglés company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Shaw’s and Star Market company and El Corte Inglés company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Shaw’s and Star Market company and El Corte Inglés company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Shaw’s and Star Market company and El Corte Inglés company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Shaw’s and Star Market company and El Corte Inglés company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Shaw’s and Star Market company and El Corte Inglés company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Shaw’s and Star Market company and El Corte Inglés company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Shaw’s and Star Market company and El Corte Inglés company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Shaw’s and Star Market and El Corte Inglés, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Shaw’s and Star Market and El Corte Inglés, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Shaw’s and Star Market or El Corte Inglés ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Shaw’s and Star Market or El Corte Inglés ?
Between Shaw’s and Star Market and El Corte Inglés, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Shaw’s and Star Market and El Corte Inglés, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-57980
SUMMARY

Authentication bypass using an alternate path or channel in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to perform tampering over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-56741
SUMMARY

JLine is a Java library for handling console input. Prior to 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1, the JLine3 Telnet server remote-telnet module does not apply an upper bound to terminal dimensions received via the Telnet NAWS option, and TelnetIO.handleNAWS() in TelnetIO.java:856-879 reads client-supplied width and height as 16-bit unsigned integers and passes values such as 65535x65535 to setTerminalGeometry(), allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to repeatedly alternate values and trigger continuous expensive rendering work that causes CPU exhaustion and denial of service. This issue is fixed in versions 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-56740
SUMMARY

JLine is a Java library for handling console input. Prior to 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1, the JLine3 Telnet server remote-telnet module does not limit the number of environment variables a client may inject via the Telnet NEW-ENVIRON option, and TelnetIO.readNEVariables() in TelnetIO.java:1127-1180 stores each variable pair in a HashMap held by ConnectionData, allowing an unauthenticated attacker to flood unique variable pairs before the terminating IAC SE byte and exhaust JVM heap memory with an OutOfMemoryError. This issue is fixed in versions 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-56171
SUMMARY

Exposure of private personal information to an unauthorized actor in Windows RDP allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-54335
SUMMARY

Feathersjs is a framework for creating web APIs and real-time applications with TypeScript or JavaScript. In 5.0.44 and earlier, the _.merge(target, source) utility exported by @feathersjs/commons recursively merges source into target by iterating Object.keys(source). When source was produced by JSON.parse and contains a __proto__, constructor, or prototype key, that key is returned as an own-enumerable property; the recursive merge then resolves target['__proto__'] to Object.prototype and writes attacker-supplied properties onto it, polluting the prototype for all plain objects in the process for the lifetime of the Node process. This issue is fixed in version 5.0.45.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.7
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2