Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Progress ShareFile PartnersProgress ShareFile Partners
VS
Amazon Fulfillment Technologies & RoboticsAmazon Fulfillment Technologies & Robotics
Progress ShareFile Partners

Progress ShareFile Partners

undefined, Raleigh, North Carolina, undefined, US

Last Update: 30/12/2025

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.sharefile.com/
752/1000Fair

We are a secure, cloud-based content collaboration platform that makes it easier for businesses to get work done on any device, anytime.

NAICS:5112
NAICS Definition:Software Publishers
Employees:0
Subsidiaries:2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Amazon Fulfillment Technologies & Robotics

Amazon Fulfillment Technologies & Robotics

300 Riverpark Drive, North Reading, MA, US, 01864

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
779/1000Fair

On the Fulfillment Technologies & Robotics Team, we build dynamic partnerships between people and intelligent machines. This intricate collaboration helps Amazon fulfill orders with unmatched accuracy. Since we began working with robotics, we've added over a million new...

NAICS:5112
NAICS Definition:Software Publishers
Employees:16,936
Subsidiaries:88
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Progress ShareFile Partners

Progress ShareFile Partners

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Amazon Fulfillment Technologies & Robotics

Amazon Fulfillment Technologies & Robotics

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Progress ShareFile Partners in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Amazon Fulfillment Technologies & Robotics in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Progress ShareFile Partners (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Progress ShareFile Partners cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Amazon Fulfillment Technologies & Robotics (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Amazon Fulfillment Technologies & Robotics cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Progress ShareFile Partners

Progress ShareFile Partners

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Amazon Fulfillment Technologies & Robotics

Amazon Fulfillment Technologies & Robotics

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Progress ShareFile Partners company and Amazon Fulfillment Technologies & Robotics company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Progress ShareFile Partners company and Amazon Fulfillment Technologies & Robotics company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Progress ShareFile Partners company and Amazon Fulfillment Technologies & Robotics company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Progress ShareFile Partners company and Amazon Fulfillment Technologies & Robotics company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Progress ShareFile Partners company and Amazon Fulfillment Technologies & Robotics company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Progress ShareFile Partners company and Amazon Fulfillment Technologies & Robotics company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Progress ShareFile Partners company and Amazon Fulfillment Technologies & Robotics company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Progress ShareFile Partners company and Amazon Fulfillment Technologies & Robotics company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Progress ShareFile Partners company and Amazon Fulfillment Technologies & Robotics company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Progress ShareFile Partners company and Amazon Fulfillment Technologies & Robotics company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Progress ShareFile Partners company and Amazon Fulfillment Technologies & Robotics company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Progress ShareFile Partners and Amazon Fulfillment Technologies & Robotics, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Progress ShareFile Partners and Amazon Fulfillment Technologies & Robotics, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Progress ShareFile Partners or Amazon Fulfillment Technologies & Robotics ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Progress ShareFile Partners or Amazon Fulfillment Technologies & Robotics ?
Between Progress ShareFile Partners and Amazon Fulfillment Technologies & Robotics, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Progress ShareFile Partners and Amazon Fulfillment Technologies & Robotics, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-56785
SUMMARY

FlatPress versions prior to commit 10be83c, contains a stored cross-site scripting vulnerability in comment and contact forms where name, URL, and email fields are rendered without proper output encoding in Smarty templates. Attackers can inject arbitrary HTML and JavaScript through these fields to execute malicious scripts in browsers of viewers including administrators, or bypass URL scheme validation to inject javascript: or data: URIs.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-23
UPDATED
Date2026-06-23
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.2)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.2
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:H/VI:L/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
4.7
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-54588
SUMMARY

Poweradmin is a web-based DNS administration tool for PowerDNS server. Versions prior to 4.2.4 and 4.3.3 use the attacker-controlled `HTTP_HOST` request header as the authoritative source for building callback URLs in its OIDC, SAML, and logout authentication flows without any validation. An unauthenticated attacker can poison the `redirect_uri` sent to the Identity Provider, causing the IdP to redirect the victim's authorization code to an attacker-controlled server - resulting in full account takeover with no credentials required. Versions 4.2.4 and 4.3.3 patch the issue.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-23
UPDATED
Date2026-06-23
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-48493
SUMMARY

Snipe-IT is an IT asset/license management system. In versions prior to 8.6.0, a user with only users.edit can send a PATCH to /api/v1/users/{their_own_id} and grant themselves any permission except admin and superuser — for example `assets.view`, `assets.create`, `reports.view`, import, etc. The issue is patched in version 8.6.0.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-23
UPDATED
Date2026-06-23
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4.2
EXPLOITABILITY
1.2
CVE-2026-47693
SUMMARY

Poweradmin is a web-based DNS administration tool for PowerDNS server. Versions prior to 4.2.4 and 4.3.3 are vulnerable to CSV Injection (Formula Injection) in its log export functionality. User-controlled data — specifically the username field — is written to exported CSV files without sanitizing formula trigger characters (=, +, -, @). When an administrator exports activity logs and opens the resulting CSV in a spreadsheet application (Microsoft Excel, LibreOffice Calc, Google Sheets), any formula stored in a username is executed by the application. This can be used for phishing attacks against administrators or data exfiltration. Versions 4.2.4 and 4.3.3 patch the issue.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-23
UPDATED
Date2026-06-23
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4.7
EXPLOITABILITY
1.7
CVE-2026-12164
SUMMARY

Fortra File Integrity Monitoring (FIM), formerly Tripwire Enterprise, versions prior to 9.4.0 may assign incorrect or elevated effective permissions to users created by the tetool import command while FIM is running, particularly when the import also creates or changes roles or role-permission relationships.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-23
UPDATED
Date2026-06-23
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
0.8