Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Shared MicromobilityShared Micromobility
VS
Transport for NSWTransport for NSW
Shared Micromobility

Shared Micromobility

Nairobi, KE

Last Update: 10/03/2026

View Profile
658/1000Weak

Shared Micromobility is: - a news blog about shared micromobility services where I publish analysis of news, business trends... A must-read in the industry - a consultancy to help any company in the shared micromobility sector. Project management, advisor on busines...

NAICS:484
NAICS Definition:Truck Transportation
Employees:1
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1
Transport for NSW

Transport for NSW

Multiple locations , Multiple locations across the state, AU

Last Update: 03/04/2026

View Profile
752/1000Fair

We’re an innovative NSW government organisation comprised of a network of agencies and divisions that keep the state moving. Our focus is on delivering safe, reliable and integrated transport networks for everyone. With over 28,000 team members, we’re committed to incl...

NAICS:484
NAICS Definition:Truck Transportation
Employees:18,452
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Shared Micromobility

Shared Micromobility

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Transport for NSW

Transport for NSW

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Truck Transportation Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Shared Micromobility in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Truck Transportation Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Transport for NSW in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Shared Micromobility (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Shared Micromobility cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Transport for NSW (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Transport for NSW cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Shared Micromobility

Shared Micromobility

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
SHA1771960006
Transport for NSW

Transport for NSW

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
TRA303092125

FAQ

Between Shared Micromobility company and Transport for NSW company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Shared Micromobility company and Transport for NSW company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Shared Micromobility company and Transport for NSW company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Shared Micromobility company and Transport for NSW company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Shared Micromobility company and Transport for NSW company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Shared Micromobility company and Transport for NSW company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Shared Micromobility company and Transport for NSW company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Shared Micromobility company and Transport for NSW company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Shared Micromobility company and Transport for NSW company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Shared Micromobility company and Transport for NSW company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Shared Micromobility company and Transport for NSW company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Shared Micromobility and Transport for NSW, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Shared Micromobility and Transport for NSW, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Shared Micromobility or Transport for NSW ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Shared Micromobility or Transport for NSW ?
Between Shared Micromobility and Transport for NSW, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Shared Micromobility and Transport for NSW, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-49416
SUMMARY

The CONS_HISTORY ioctl handler did not adequately validate the requested history size. A large value caused an integer overflow in the buffer size calculation, resulting in a heap allocation smaller than expected. Subsequent initialization of the buffer wrote beyond the end of the allocation. An unprivileged local user with access to a vt(4) device can trigger an out-of-bounds write in the kernel, potentially escalating privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49414
SUMMARY

The ELF image activator cleared per-process ASLR preference flags for setuid binaries after the code that computes the PIE base address, rather than before. As a result, a user-requested ASLR disable was still in effect at the point where the base address was chosen. An unprivileged local user can disable ASLR for a setuid PIE binary by calling procctl(2) before execve(2). This makes exploitation of any separate memory corruption vulnerability in that binary significantly easier.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49417
SUMMARY

Second, the audio buffer backing a mapping could be freed when the device was closed even though the mapping remained valid. The freed memory could then be reused elsewhere while still accessible through the stale mapping. The /dev/dsp device nodes are world-accessible by default. On a system with an audio device, either issue allows an unprivileged local user to read and write kernel memory, which can be used to escalate privileges, potentially gaining full control of the affected system. At a minimum, an attacker can crash the kernel, resulting in a Denial of Service (DoS).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49413
SUMMARY

The Linuxulator determined whether a binary was set-user-ID or set-group-ID by checking the P_SUGID process flag. During execve(2), this flag is not yet set at the point where the auxiliary vector is constructed, so AT_SECURE was incorrectly set to zero for set-user-ID and set-group-ID executables. An unprivileged local user can inject a shared library via LD_PRELOAD into a set-user-ID or set-group-ID Linux binary, gaining the privileges of that binary.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49412
SUMMARY

The kernel handler for IPV6_MSFILTER dropped a serializing lock in order to copy the source-filter list from userspace, then reacquired the lock. During this window another thread could free the multicast filter structure, leaving the handler with a stale pointer to freed memory. An unprivileged local user can exploit this use-after-free to escalate privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA