Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

SHAPE EcosystemSHAPE Ecosystem
VS
Yıldız HoldingYıldız Holding
SHAPE Ecosystem

SHAPE Ecosystem

Pensalavägen 210, Jeppo, Ostrobothnia, FI, 66850

Last Update: 09/11/2025

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.shape-ecosystem.com/
761/1000Fair

SHAPE is an ecosystem launched by Mirka to accelerate the development of new solutions for the (re)manufacturing industry. The ecosystem focuses on reshaping life cycles of products and materials by boosting circularity, finding sustainable material solutions, piloting ...

NAICS:30
NAICS Definition:Manufacturing
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Yıldız Holding

Yıldız Holding

Kısıklı Mah. Ferah Cad. No:1, Istanbul, 34692, TR

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.yildizholding.com.tr
796/1000Fair

Yıldız Holding’in 1944 yılında İstanbul’da bisküvi üretimiyle başlayan hikâyesi, bugün 300’den fazla markayla 5 kıtada 4 milyar insana ulaştırdığımız gıda-atıştırmalık ürünlerimizle ve Türkiye’nin her noktasındaki perakende şirketlerimizle devam ediyor. Kökleri Türkiy...

NAICS:30
NAICS Definition:Manufacturing
Employees:19,803
Subsidiaries:15
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
SHAPE Ecosystem

SHAPE Ecosystem

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Yıldız Holding

Yıldız Holding

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for SHAPE Ecosystem in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Yıldız Holding in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - SHAPE Ecosystem (X = Date, Y = Severity)

SHAPE Ecosystem cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Yıldız Holding (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Yıldız Holding cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
SHAPE Ecosystem

SHAPE Ecosystem

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Yıldız Holding

Yıldız Holding

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between SHAPE Ecosystem company and Yıldız Holding company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between SHAPE Ecosystem company and Yıldız Holding company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between SHAPE Ecosystem company and Yıldız Holding company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between SHAPE Ecosystem company and Yıldız Holding company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between SHAPE Ecosystem company and Yıldız Holding company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between SHAPE Ecosystem company and Yıldız Holding company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between SHAPE Ecosystem company and Yıldız Holding company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between SHAPE Ecosystem company and Yıldız Holding company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between SHAPE Ecosystem company and Yıldız Holding company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between SHAPE Ecosystem company and Yıldız Holding company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between SHAPE Ecosystem company and Yıldız Holding company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between SHAPE Ecosystem and Yıldız Holding, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between SHAPE Ecosystem and Yıldız Holding, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - SHAPE Ecosystem or Yıldız Holding ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - SHAPE Ecosystem or Yıldız Holding ?
Between SHAPE Ecosystem and Yıldız Holding, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between SHAPE Ecosystem and Yıldız Holding, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-9693
SUMMARY

Mattermost versions 10.11.x <= 10.11.20, 11.7.x <= 11.7.5 Mattermost fails to remove thread membership records when a user is removed from or leaves a team, which allows a previously removed user who is later re-invited to the team to view private channel thread root post content and metadata via the team threads API.. Mattermost Advisory ID: MMSA-2026-00682

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-17
UPDATED
Date2026-08-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
REFERENCES
CVE-2026-75587
SUMMARY

Mattermost Desktop App versions <=6.2 6.2.2.0 fail to redact the pre-auth secret when generating a diagnostics report, which allows a local attacker with access to a user's diagnostics report or log files to obtain the plaintext pre-auth secret configured for a connected server via inspecting the Server Connectivity (Step-3) diagnostics output. Mattermost Advisory ID: MMSA-2026-00716

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-17
UPDATED
Date2026-08-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
REFERENCES
CVE-2026-75078
SUMMARY

A security flaw has been discovered in SourceCodester Class and Exam Timetabling System 1.0. This affects an unknown part of the file /BSHRM1.php. Performing a manipulation of the argument course results in cross site scripting. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. The exploit has been released to the public and may be used for attacks.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-17
UPDATED
Date2026-08-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS2
Base Score: 5.0
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 2.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
REFERENCES
CVE-2026-67961
SUMMARY

An issue in O2OA v.10.0.2 allows a local attacker to execute arbitrary code via the the sandbox mechanism of the Invoke script execution.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-17
UPDATED
Date2026-08-17
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
REFERENCES
CVE-2026-67919
SUMMARY

An issue in Halo 2.25.4 allows a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code via the PluginEndpoint.java, installFromUri method, and DefaultPluginApplicationContextFactory components

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-17
UPDATED
Date2026-08-17
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
REFERENCES