Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Lufthansa Technik Shannon Limited (LTSL) formerly Shannon AerospaceLufthansa Technik Shannon Limited (LTSL) formerly Shannon Aerospace
VS
QantasQantas
Lufthansa Technik Shannon Limited (LTSL) formerly Shannon Aerospace

Lufthansa Technik Shannon Limited (LTSL) formerly Shannon Aerospace

N/A

Last Update: 28/03/2026

View Profile
752/1000Fair

LTSL, a subsidiary of Lufthansa Technik AG, specialising in the provision of Base Maintenance services on Boeing 737, 757 & 767, Airbus A319, A320 & A321 aircraft to the world’s airline industry. We also offer a portfolio of other expert services such as aircraft paint...

NAICS:481
NAICS Definition:Air Transportation
Employees:203
Subsidiaries:49
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Qantas

Qantas

10 Bourke Road, Mascot, 2020, AU

Last Update: 19/06/2026

View Profile
Between 0 and 549
https://www.qantas.com
100/1000Critical

We would like to acknowledge the Traditional Custodians of the local lands and waterways on which we live, work and fly. We pay our respects to Elders past and present.   Spirit is everything to us, and joining the Qantas team means bringing your spirit to ours. We have...

NAICS:481
NAICS Definition:Air Transportation
Employees:17,844
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
4
Attack type number
3

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Lufthansa Technik Shannon Limited (LTSL) formerly Shannon Aerospace

Lufthansa Technik Shannon Limited (LTSL) formerly Shannon Aerospace

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Qantas

Qantas

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Airlines and Aviation Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Lufthansa Technik Shannon Limited (LTSL) formerly Shannon Aerospace in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Airlines and Aviation Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Qantas in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Lufthansa Technik Shannon Limited (LTSL) formerly Shannon Aerospace (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Lufthansa Technik Shannon Limited (LTSL) formerly Shannon Aerospace cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Qantas (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Qantas cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Lufthansa Technik Shannon Limited (LTSL) formerly Shannon Aerospace

Lufthansa Technik Shannon Limited (LTSL) formerly Shannon Aerospace

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Qantas

Qantas

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
QAN2902229100425
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
HAWQANMGM1771230438
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
QAN0192201101325

FAQ

Between Lufthansa Technik Shannon Limited (LTSL) formerly Shannon Aerospace company and Qantas company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Lufthansa Technik Shannon Limited (LTSL) formerly Shannon Aerospace company and Qantas company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Lufthansa Technik Shannon Limited (LTSL) formerly Shannon Aerospace company and Qantas company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Lufthansa Technik Shannon Limited (LTSL) formerly Shannon Aerospace company and Qantas company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Lufthansa Technik Shannon Limited (LTSL) formerly Shannon Aerospace company and Qantas company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Lufthansa Technik Shannon Limited (LTSL) formerly Shannon Aerospace company and Qantas company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Lufthansa Technik Shannon Limited (LTSL) formerly Shannon Aerospace company and Qantas company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Lufthansa Technik Shannon Limited (LTSL) formerly Shannon Aerospace company and Qantas company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Lufthansa Technik Shannon Limited (LTSL) formerly Shannon Aerospace company and Qantas company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Lufthansa Technik Shannon Limited (LTSL) formerly Shannon Aerospace company and Qantas company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Lufthansa Technik Shannon Limited (LTSL) formerly Shannon Aerospace company and Qantas company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Lufthansa Technik Shannon Limited (LTSL) formerly Shannon Aerospace and Qantas, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Lufthansa Technik Shannon Limited (LTSL) formerly Shannon Aerospace and Qantas, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Lufthansa Technik Shannon Limited (LTSL) formerly Shannon Aerospace or Qantas ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Lufthansa Technik Shannon Limited (LTSL) formerly Shannon Aerospace or Qantas ?
Between Lufthansa Technik Shannon Limited (LTSL) formerly Shannon Aerospace and Qantas, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Lufthansa Technik Shannon Limited (LTSL) formerly Shannon Aerospace and Qantas, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-49416
SUMMARY

The CONS_HISTORY ioctl handler did not adequately validate the requested history size. A large value caused an integer overflow in the buffer size calculation, resulting in a heap allocation smaller than expected. Subsequent initialization of the buffer wrote beyond the end of the allocation. An unprivileged local user with access to a vt(4) device can trigger an out-of-bounds write in the kernel, potentially escalating privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49414
SUMMARY

The ELF image activator cleared per-process ASLR preference flags for setuid binaries after the code that computes the PIE base address, rather than before. As a result, a user-requested ASLR disable was still in effect at the point where the base address was chosen. An unprivileged local user can disable ASLR for a setuid PIE binary by calling procctl(2) before execve(2). This makes exploitation of any separate memory corruption vulnerability in that binary significantly easier.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49417
SUMMARY

Second, the audio buffer backing a mapping could be freed when the device was closed even though the mapping remained valid. The freed memory could then be reused elsewhere while still accessible through the stale mapping. The /dev/dsp device nodes are world-accessible by default. On a system with an audio device, either issue allows an unprivileged local user to read and write kernel memory, which can be used to escalate privileges, potentially gaining full control of the affected system. At a minimum, an attacker can crash the kernel, resulting in a Denial of Service (DoS).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49413
SUMMARY

The Linuxulator determined whether a binary was set-user-ID or set-group-ID by checking the P_SUGID process flag. During execve(2), this flag is not yet set at the point where the auxiliary vector is constructed, so AT_SECURE was incorrectly set to zero for set-user-ID and set-group-ID executables. An unprivileged local user can inject a shared library via LD_PRELOAD into a set-user-ID or set-group-ID Linux binary, gaining the privileges of that binary.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49412
SUMMARY

The kernel handler for IPV6_MSFILTER dropped a serializing lock in order to copy the source-filter list from userspace, then reacquired the lock. During this window another thread could free the multicast filter structure, leaving the handler with a stale pointer to freed memory. An unprivileged local user can exploit this use-after-free to escalate privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA