Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Shanghai Tunnel Engineering Co., Ltd.Shanghai Tunnel Engineering Co., Ltd.
VS
SNC-LavalinSNC-Lavalin
Shanghai Tunnel Engineering Co., Ltd.

Shanghai Tunnel Engineering Co., Ltd.

No.1099 Wanping South Road Xuhui District, SHANGHAI, 200232, CN

Last Update: 28/04/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.stec.net
806/1000Good

Shanghai Tunnel Engineering is a civil engineering company based out of SHANGHAI. Shanghai Tunnel Engineering representatives, don’t miss out on opportunities to build relationships with members on LinkedIn. Claim your page, write a simple description, and share content...

NAICS:237
NAICS Definition:Heavy and Civil Engineering Construction
Employees:651
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1
SNC-Lavalin

SNC-Lavalin

455 René-Lévesque Blvd West, Montreal, H2Z 1Z3, CA

Last Update: 03/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.snclavalin.com/
790/1000Fair

SNC Lavalin is now AtkinsRéalis. Please follow AtkinsRéalis on LinkedIn. We are a world-class engineering services and nuclear organization. We connect people, data and technology to transform the world’s infrastructure and energy systems. Together, with our industry...

NAICS:237
NAICS Definition:Heavy and Civil Engineering Construction
Employees:12,111
Subsidiaries:4
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Shanghai Tunnel Engineering Co., Ltd.

Shanghai Tunnel Engineering Co., Ltd.

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
SNC-Lavalin

SNC-Lavalin

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Civil Engineering Industry Avg (This Year)

Shanghai Tunnel Engineering Co., Ltd. has 50.0% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incidents vs Civil Engineering Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for SNC-Lavalin in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Shanghai Tunnel Engineering Co., Ltd. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Shanghai Tunnel Engineering Co., Ltd. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - SNC-Lavalin (X = Date, Y = Severity)

SNC-Lavalin cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Shanghai Tunnel Engineering Co., Ltd.

Shanghai Tunnel Engineering Co., Ltd.

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
SHA1777343500
SNC-Lavalin

SNC-Lavalin

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Shanghai Tunnel Engineering Co., Ltd. company and SNC-Lavalin company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Shanghai Tunnel Engineering Co., Ltd. company and SNC-Lavalin company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Shanghai Tunnel Engineering Co., Ltd. company and SNC-Lavalin company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Shanghai Tunnel Engineering Co., Ltd. company and SNC-Lavalin company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Shanghai Tunnel Engineering Co., Ltd. company and SNC-Lavalin company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Shanghai Tunnel Engineering Co., Ltd. company and SNC-Lavalin company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Shanghai Tunnel Engineering Co., Ltd. company and SNC-Lavalin company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Shanghai Tunnel Engineering Co., Ltd. company and SNC-Lavalin company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Shanghai Tunnel Engineering Co., Ltd. company and SNC-Lavalin company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Shanghai Tunnel Engineering Co., Ltd. company and SNC-Lavalin company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Shanghai Tunnel Engineering Co., Ltd. company and SNC-Lavalin company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Shanghai Tunnel Engineering Co., Ltd. and SNC-Lavalin, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Shanghai Tunnel Engineering Co., Ltd. and SNC-Lavalin, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Shanghai Tunnel Engineering Co., Ltd. or SNC-Lavalin ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Shanghai Tunnel Engineering Co., Ltd. or SNC-Lavalin ?
Between Shanghai Tunnel Engineering Co., Ltd. and SNC-Lavalin, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Shanghai Tunnel Engineering Co., Ltd. and SNC-Lavalin, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-58523
SUMMARY

Improper access control in Microsoft Edge for Android allows an unauthorized attacker to bypass a security feature over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-03
UPDATED
Date2026-07-03
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-14617
SUMMARY

A security vulnerability has been detected in NousResearch hermes-agent up to 2026.4.30. Affected is the function GatewayStreamConsumer._filter_and_accumulate of the file gateway/stream_consumer.py of the component Streaming Reasoning Tag Filter. The manipulation leads to improper handling of case sensitivity. The attack may be initiated remotely. The attack's complexity is rated as high. The exploitability is told to be difficult. The exploit has been disclosed publicly and may be used. The project decided to not implement a dedicated fix: "[T]he analysis and the fix are both sound. It just lands below the bar for the maintenance cost of a duplicated scrub path."

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-03
UPDATED
Date2026-07-03
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.1)
CVSS2
Base Score: 2.1
Complexity: HIGH
AV:N/AC:H/Au:S/C:P/I:N/A:N
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.1
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 1.3
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
1.6
CVE-2026-58597
SUMMARY

Insufficient ui warning of dangerous operations in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to perform spoofing over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-03
UPDATED
Date2026-07-03
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-58524
SUMMARY

Improper neutralization of input during web page generation ('cross-site scripting') in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to perform spoofing over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-03
UPDATED
Date2026-07-03
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-58522
SUMMARY

Relative path traversal in Microsoft Edge for Android allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information locally.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-03
UPDATED
Date2026-07-03
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.5