Comparison Overview

SF EXPRESS (EUROPE)

VS

A.P. Moller - Maersk

SF EXPRESS (EUROPE)

Suite 1, 1 Heathrow Boulevard, 286 Bath Road, London, None, GB, UB7 0DQ
Last Update: 2025-11-26

SF (SZSE:002352)was established in Shunde, Guangdong Province in 1993, headquartered in Shenzhen, China. Through years of development, SF has become the largest integrated logistics service provider in China and Asia, and the fourth largest in the world*. Centering on the logistics ecosystem, SF has continually developed its portfolio of product and service capabilities and has expanded to cover timeliness express delivery, economy express, freight, cold chain, pharmaceuticals, intra-city on-demand delivery, international express, international freight and freight forwarding, and supply chain, to provide customers with domestic and international end-to-end one-stop supply chain services. Meanwhile, through leveraging leading technology and research and development capabilities, SF strives to create a digital supply chain ecosystem and become a front-runner in the global intelligent supply chain. *According to Frost & Sullivan Report, in terms of revenue in 2023

NAICS: 47
NAICS Definition: Transportation and Warehousing
Employees: 22
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

A.P. Moller - Maersk

Esplanaden 50, None, Copenhagen, None, DK, 1098
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 800 and 849

A.P. Moller - Maersk is an integrated transport and logistics company; going all the way, together, for our customers and society. ALL THE WAY is our commitment to connect the world so that everyone has both the possibility and the ability to trade, grow and thrive. The company employs roughly 110.000 employees across operations in 130 countries.

NAICS: 47
NAICS Definition: Transportation and Warehousing
Employees: 79,448
Subsidiaries: 17
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sf-express-europe.jpeg
SF EXPRESS (EUROPE)
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/maersk-group.jpeg
A.P. Moller - Maersk
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
SF EXPRESS (EUROPE)
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
A.P. Moller - Maersk
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Transportation, Logistics, Supply Chain and Storage Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for SF EXPRESS (EUROPE) in 2025.

Incidents vs Transportation, Logistics, Supply Chain and Storage Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for A.P. Moller - Maersk in 2025.

Incident History — SF EXPRESS (EUROPE) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

SF EXPRESS (EUROPE) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — A.P. Moller - Maersk (X = Date, Y = Severity)

A.P. Moller - Maersk cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sf-express-europe.jpeg
SF EXPRESS (EUROPE)
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/maersk-group.jpeg
A.P. Moller - Maersk
Incidents

Date Detected: 6/2017
Type:Cyber Attack
Attack Vector: Malware (NotPetya), Supply Chain Compromise (via Ukrainian accounting software M.E.Doc), Lateral Movement
Motivation: Geopolitical (targeting Ukraine), Collateral Damage (global spread), Disruption of Critical Infrastructure
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 6/2017
Type:Cyber Attack
Attack Vector: Compromised Software Updates (NotPetya via Ukrainian accounting software), Phishing/Social Engineering, Outdated/Poorly Maintained Systems, Third-Party Vendor Vulnerabilities, GNSS Jamming/Spoofing (Russia, Iran, China), AI-Assisted Exploits (e.g., subverting AI assistants), Manual Override of Digital Systems (human error)
Motivation: Financial Gain (Ransomware), Geopolitical Disruption (State Actors), Espionage (Strategic Maritime Data), Hacktivism (e.g., Lab-Dookhtegan), Operational Sabotage (e.g., GNSS Interference)
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 6/2017
Type:Cyber Attack
Attack Vector: Compromised Software Update, Backdoor in M.E.Doc
Motivation: Geopolitical Disruption, Targeting Ukraine (Maersk as collateral damage)
Blog: Blog

FAQ

A.P. Moller - Maersk company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to SF EXPRESS (EUROPE) company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

A.P. Moller - Maersk company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas SF EXPRESS (EUROPE) company has not reported any.

In the current year, A.P. Moller - Maersk company and SF EXPRESS (EUROPE) company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither A.P. Moller - Maersk company nor SF EXPRESS (EUROPE) company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither A.P. Moller - Maersk company nor SF EXPRESS (EUROPE) company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

A.P. Moller - Maersk company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while SF EXPRESS (EUROPE) company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither SF EXPRESS (EUROPE) company nor A.P. Moller - Maersk company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither SF EXPRESS (EUROPE) nor A.P. Moller - Maersk holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

A.P. Moller - Maersk company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to SF EXPRESS (EUROPE) company.

A.P. Moller - Maersk company employs more people globally than SF EXPRESS (EUROPE) company, reflecting its scale as a Transportation, Logistics, Supply Chain and Storage.

Neither SF EXPRESS (EUROPE) nor A.P. Moller - Maersk holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither SF EXPRESS (EUROPE) nor A.P. Moller - Maersk holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither SF EXPRESS (EUROPE) nor A.P. Moller - Maersk holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither SF EXPRESS (EUROPE) nor A.P. Moller - Maersk holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither SF EXPRESS (EUROPE) nor A.P. Moller - Maersk holds HIPAA certification.

Neither SF EXPRESS (EUROPE) nor A.P. Moller - Maersk holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H