IBM SevOne
Company Details
Linkedin ID:
sevone-inc
Employees number:
117
Number of followers:
10,381
NAICS:
51125
Industry Type:
Homepage:
ibm.com
IP Addresses:
0
Company ID:
IBM_2599437
Scan Status:
In-progress
IBM SevOne Company CyberSecurity Posture
ibm.com
Struggling to address the soaring complexities of modern network management? Network infrastructures built for digital transformation require monitoring solutions that can be just as dynamic, flexible, and scalable as the new environments. Designed for modern networks, IBM® SevOne helps you spot, address, and prevent network performance issues early with machine learning-powered analytics. With real-time, actionable insights; it helps proactively monitor multivendor networks across enterprise, communication, and managed service providers. Going beyond detection, IBM SevOne combines industry-leading expertise and advanced technologies to help your IT team act on what matters: improving network performance to provide an exceptional user experience.
IBM SevOne A.I CyberSecurity Scoring
IBM SevOne Risk Score (AI oriented)Between 750 and 799
IBM SevOne
Updated:
- Powered by our proprietary A.I cyber incident model
- Insurance preferes TPRM score to calculate premium
IBM SevOne Global Score (TPRM)XXXX
IBM SevOne
- Instant access to detailed risk factors
- Benchmark vs. industry & size peers
- Vulnerabilities
- Findings
IBM SevOne Company CyberSecurity News & History
Past Incidents
14
Attack Types
3
IBM (as referenced in the study with Palo Alto Networks)
Breach
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack limited on finance or reputation
Description: The article highlights systemic vulnerabilities in IBM’s research, where organizations managing an average of **83 security tools from 29 vendors** face severe operational inefficiencies. Fragmented architectures—exemplified by IBM’s findings—create blind spots, with **95% of security leaders admitting redundant tools lack full integration**. This sprawl leads to **72-day delays in threat detection** and **84-day delays in containment**, directly enabling attackers to exploit gaps. The study underscores that **one-third of breaches originate from phishing**, with Secure Email Gateways (SEGs) failing to block an average of **67.5 phishing emails per 100 mailboxes monthly**. Default configurations, misaligned protections, and unintegrated tools amplify risks, resulting in **missed handoffs, poor detection, and inflated response costs**. The cumulative effect is **reputational damage, financial loss from prolonged breaches, and erosion of customer trust**, particularly for smaller teams lacking resources to maintain defenses. IBM’s own data reveals that non-consolidated environments suffer **101% lower ROI** compared to unified platforms, signaling systemic exposure to **sophisticated social engineering and evolving threat tactics** that bypass static defenses.
International Business Machines Corporation
Breach
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack with significant impact with customers data leaks
Description: The California Office of the Attorney General disclosed that IBM suffered an unauthorized access incident affecting the **Janssen CarePath platform**, a database containing personal information. The breach was reported on **September 22, 2023**, though the exact date of the intrusion remains undisclosed. While the specifics of the compromised data were not detailed in the report, the incident involved the exposure of personal information, likely belonging to customers or patients associated with the platform. Given the nature of Janssen CarePath—a service supporting healthcare-related financial and treatment assistance—the breach raises concerns about potential misuse of sensitive health or personally identifiable information (PII). IBM has not publicly confirmed the scale of the breach or whether the exposed data was exfiltrated, but the involvement of a government authority suggests regulatory scrutiny and possible compliance implications under data protection laws like **CCPA (California Consumer Privacy Act)** or **HIPAA (Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act)** if health data was impacted.
IBM (as referenced in the article)
Breach
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack threatening the organization's existence
Description: The article highlights IBM’s **2024 Cost of a Data Breach Report**, which underscores escalating financial and operational damages from breaches due to prolonged investigations, regulatory scrutiny, and unauthorized data exposure—including leaks via ungoverned AI tools or improper file sharing. The report aligns with broader trends cited by **ENISA (2024)**, noting persistent **ransomware and data theft** targeting sensitive corporate and customer data. These breaches exploit weak access controls, unclear permissions, and inadequate audit trails in virtual data rooms (VDRs), leading to **costly remediation, reputational harm, and compliance violations**. The financial impact is compounded by **delayed incident response**, where breaches involving high-value data (e.g., M&A documents, employee records, or customer PII) incur **higher cleanup costs** and **regulatory penalties**. The article implies that organizations using substandard VDRs face **increased risk of insider threats, third-party leaks, or ransomware attacks**, as demonstrated by real-world cases where **unauthorized AI processing or mass downloads** of sensitive files went undetected until post-breach forensics. The cumulative effect threatens **deal integrity, investor trust, and long-term business viability**, particularly in high-stakes sectors like finance, healthcare, or critical infrastructure.
IBM
Cyber Attack
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack without any consequences: Attack in which data is not compromised
Description: The incident involves a **403 Forbidden** error, indicating unauthorized or restricted access to a specific IBM webpage or resource. While the error itself does not explicitly detail a cybersecurity breach, such access restrictions can sometimes mask underlying security issues—such as misconfigured permissions, potential brute-force attempts, or unauthorized probing of IBM’s systems. If this error persists across multiple users or is part of a larger pattern (e.g., defacement, data exfiltration, or service disruption), it could signal a **cyber attack** targeting IBM’s web infrastructure. The lack of visible consequences in the error message suggests no immediate data compromise, but further investigation would be required to rule out malicious activity like reconnaissance for a larger attack. The incident number provided (18.5c1e1202.1759343245.17fb734f) may correlate with internal logs for deeper analysis.
IBM
Cyber Attack
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack without any consequences: Attack in which data is not compromised
Description: The incident involves a **403 Forbidden** error, indicating unauthorized access to a restricted IBM web page or resource. While the error itself does not explicitly confirm a cybersecurity breach, it may suggest a misconfigured access control, failed authentication attempt, or a potential probing attack by malicious actors. If this error is part of a larger pattern—such as repeated unauthorized access attempts—it could signal an early-stage **Cyber Attack** targeting IBM’s systems. The exposure of an **Incident Number (18.6e3f655f.1762993875.3f8d8f64)** in the error message might also imply improper error-handling practices, which could aid attackers in reconnaissance. Though no direct data compromise or operational disruption is evident, the incident warrants investigation to rule out exploitation attempts or vulnerabilities in IBM’s web infrastructure.
IBM
Cyber Attack
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack without any consequences: Attack in which data is not compromised
Description: The incident involves a **403 Forbidden** error, indicating unauthorized or restricted access to a specific IBM webpage or resource. While the error itself does not explicitly detail a cybersecurity breach, it may suggest a misconfigured access control, potential unauthorized access attempt, or a security measure blocking legitimate requests. If this error is part of a broader attack—such as a **DDoS, credential stuffing, or web application exploit**—it could imply an attempt to compromise IBM’s systems or data. However, without further context, the direct impact remains unclear. The incident number provided (18.85e41602.1758759830.50779d9f) hints at a logged security event, but no evidence of data exfiltration, financial loss, or operational disruption is visible. The scenario aligns with a **possible vulnerability exploitation or cyber attack** with limited immediate consequences, though further investigation would be required to confirm intent or damage.
IBM (Healthcare Sector Example)
Cyber Attack
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack that could injure or kill people
Description: The IBM report highlights the escalating financial toll of data breaches in the healthcare industry, which consistently ranks as the most expensive sector for such incidents. Between May 2020 and February 2025, the average cost of a healthcare data breach surged to **$10.93 million USD**, the highest across all industries. These breaches often involve the exposure of highly sensitive patient records, including medical histories, treatment details, and personally identifiable information (PII). A typical incident in this sector may stem from a **cyber attack**—such as ransomware or targeted hacking—where threat actors exploit vulnerabilities in hospital IT systems or third-party vendors.The consequences extend beyond financial losses, disrupting critical healthcare services. For instance, a ransomware attack could encrypt patient databases, delaying emergency treatments, surgeries, or diagnostic procedures. In extreme cases, such disruptions have been linked to increased patient mortality rates. The breach’s ripple effects also erode public trust, trigger regulatory fines (e.g., HIPAA violations), and necessitate costly remediation efforts, including system overhauls and credit monitoring for affected individuals.Given the life-or-death stakes of healthcare data integrity, these breaches are classified among the most severe, often involving **criminal hackers** or state-sponsored groups targeting intellectual property (e.g., drug patents) or aiming to destabilize regional health infrastructure.
IBM
Vulnerability
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack without any consequences: Attack in which data is not compromised
Description: The incident involves a **403 Forbidden** error, which typically indicates unauthorized access to a restricted resource on IBM’s systems. While the error message itself does not disclose specifics, such incidents can stem from misconfigured access controls, failed authentication attempts, or potential probing by malicious actors (e.g., cyber attackers testing for vulnerabilities). If this error resulted from an external attack—such as a **brute-force attempt, credential stuffing, or exploitation of an exposed API**—it could signal a **security weakness** in IBM’s web infrastructure. However, the provided details do not confirm data compromise, system breach, or operational disruption. The lack of further context (e.g., logs, incident reports) limits assessment to a **potential low-impact security event**, though it warrants investigation to rule out targeted reconnaissance or early-stage cyber threats.
IBM
Vulnerability
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack without any consequences: Attack in which data is not compromised
Description: The incident involves a **403 Forbidden** error on an IBM web page, indicating unauthorized access or a misconfigured security restriction. While the error itself does not explicitly detail a cyberattack, it may suggest a potential **access control vulnerability** or an unintended exposure of internal systems. If exploited, such vulnerabilities could allow attackers to probe deeper into IBM’s infrastructure, potentially leading to data exposure or service disruptions. The incident reference number (18.561e1202.1762842001.646fd49b) implies internal tracking, but no public details confirm data breaches or operational impact. However, unaddressed access flaws could escalate into broader security risks, including credential stuffing, API abuses, or reconnaissance for targeted attacks. IBM’s global scale means even minor vulnerabilities could have cascading effects if left unresolved.
IBM
Vulnerability
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack without any consequences: Attack in which data is not compromised
Description: The incident involves a **403 Forbidden** error, indicating unauthorized access or a potential security misconfiguration on an IBM web page (Incident Number: **18.c51e1202.1762367164.50da3b68**). While the error itself does not confirm a breach, it may suggest a **vulnerability** in access controls or improperly secured resources. If exploited, such weaknesses could allow attackers to probe for sensitive data, escalate privileges, or disrupt services. The exposure of incident IDs in error messages might also aid adversaries in reconnaissance. Though no direct data compromise or operational impact is evident from the error alone, unpatched vulnerabilities of this nature could lead to broader cyber threats, including **data leaks, service disruptions, or reputational harm** if left unaddressed. IBM’s prompt remediation would be critical to mitigate risks associated with improper access restrictions.
IBM
Vulnerability
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack without any consequences: Attack in which data is not compromised
Description: The incident involves a **403 Forbidden** error, indicating unauthorized access to an IBM web resource (Incident ID: **18.ceb0f748.1757485191.4eafbe3**). While the error itself does not confirm a breach, it suggests a potential **misconfigured access control, exposed internal page, or failed security measure** that could allow attackers to probe for vulnerabilities. If exploited, this could lead to unauthorized data exposure, credential harvesting, or further system infiltration. The lack of public details implies IBM may have mitigated the issue internally, but the incident highlights risks of **improper access restrictions**, which are common entry points for cyber attacks. Without evidence of data theft or operational disruption, the impact remains speculative but warrants classification as a **security vulnerability** requiring remediation to prevent escalation.
IBM
Vulnerability
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack without any consequences: Attack in which data is not compromised
Description: The incident involves a **403 Forbidden** error, indicating unauthorized or restricted access to an IBM web resource. While the error itself does not explicitly detail a cybersecurity breach, such errors can sometimes mask underlying security issues like misconfigured access controls, failed authentication attempts, or potential probing by malicious actors. If this error persists across critical systems or is part of a larger pattern (e.g., repeated unauthorized access attempts), it could signal a **vulnerability** in IBM’s web infrastructure—either an exposed endpoint, improper permission settings, or a precursor to a more severe attack (e.g., reconnaissance for a future breach). Without additional context, the direct impact remains unclear, but unauthorized access attempts or misconfigurations could lead to data exposure or system compromise if left unaddressed.
IBM
Vulnerability
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack with significant impact with internal employee data leaks
Description: Four zero-day vulnerabilities impacted an IBM security product after the company refused to patch bugs following a private bug disclosure attempt. The bugs impacted the IBM Data Risk Manager (IDRM). It is an enterprise security tool that aggregates feeds from vulnerability scanning tools and other risk management tools to let admins investigate security issues. The compromise of product led to a full-scale company compromise, as the tool had credentials to access other security tools. It contained information about critical vulnerabilities that affect the company.
IBM
Vulnerability
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack threatening the organization's existence
Description: IBM experienced a cloud outage on Wednesday that lasted over four hours, causing users to be unable to access the console for managing their cloud resources or to open and view support cases. This outage repeated a similar incident from Tuesday. Additionally, IBM identified a critical-rated vulnerability in its QRadar threat detection and response tools and Cloud Pak for Security integration suite, which left a password in a configuration file. The vulnerability was scored 9.6 on the Common Vulnerability Scoring System, and IBM's security bulletin also advised of four other QRadar flaws.
IBM SevOne Company Scoring based on AI Models
Cyber Incidents Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months
A.I Risk Score Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months
Underwriter Stats for IBM SevOne
Incidents vs Computer Networking Products Industry Average (This Year)
No incidents recorded for IBM SevOne in 2025.
Incidents vs All-Companies Average (This Year)
No incidents recorded for IBM SevOne in 2025.
Incident Types IBM SevOne vs Computer Networking Products Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for IBM SevOne in 2025.
Incident History — IBM SevOne (X = Date, Y = Severity)
IBM SevOne cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries
IBM SevOne Company Subsidiaries
Struggling to address the soaring complexities of modern network management? Network infrastructures built for digital transformation require monitoring solutions that can be just as dynamic, flexible, and scalable as the new environments. Designed for modern networks, IBM® SevOne helps you spot, address, and prevent network performance issues early with machine learning-powered analytics. With real-time, actionable insights; it helps proactively monitor multivendor networks across enterprise, communication, and managed service providers. Going beyond detection, IBM SevOne combines industry-leading expertise and advanced technologies to help your IT team act on what matters: improving network performance to provide an exceptional user experience.
Loading...
IBM SevOne Similar Companies
A leading applied technology services company, we innovate to deliver service excellence and successful outcomes across sales, delivery and development. With our strategy to be agile, nimble and customer-centric, we anticipate the future of applied technology and predict tomorrow’s trends to keep ou
Capgemini
Capgemini is a global business and technology transformation partner, helping organizations to accelerate their dual transition to a digital and sustainable world, while creating tangible impact for enterprises and society. It is a responsible and diverse group of 340,000 team members in more than 5
Hitachi
Since its founding in 1910, Hitachi has responded to the expectations of society and its customers through technology and innovation. Our mission is to “Contribute to society through the development of superior, original technology and products.” Over the past 100+ years this commitment has led us t
Tech Mahindra
Tech Mahindra offers technology consulting and digital solutions to global enterprises across industries, enabling transformative scale at unparalleled speed. With 150,000+ professionals across 90+ countries helping 1100+ clients, TechM provides a full spectrum of services including consulting, info
Sogeti
Part of the Capgemini Group, Sogeti makes business value through technology for organizations that need to implement innovation at speed and want a local partner with global scale. With a hands-on culture and close proximity to its clients, Sogeti implements solutions that will help organizations wo
Canon EMEA
We are Canon Europe. We are the world's best imaging company. This page represents our offices in Europe, the Middle East and Africa. Founded in 1937, the desire to continuously innovate has kept Canon at the forefront of imaging excellence throughout its 85-year history and has commitments to inve
.png)
IBM SevOne CyberSecurity News
October 10, 2025 11:18 AM
From complexity to clarity: AIOps across cloud deployments using IBM products
Artificial intelligence for IT operations (AIOps) enables better, more informed decision-making capabilities through contextualizing and consolidating large...
July 24, 2025 07:00 AM
Network Observability with IBM SevOne 8.0: A strategic imperative in the age of complexity
IBM SevOne 8.0 is built to help NetOps teams reclaim control in a chaotic landscape, providing the clarity, speed and insight needed to...
April 01, 2025 07:55 PM
Router reality check: 86% of default passwords have never been changed
According to recent survey data, 86% of respondents have never changed their router admin password, and 52% have never adjusted any factory settings.
Frequently Asked Questions
Explore insights on cybersecurity incidents, risk posture, and Rankiteo's assessments.
IBM SevOne CyberSecurity History Information
Official Website of IBM SevOne
The official website of IBM SevOne is https://www.ibm.com/products/sevone-network-performance-management.
IBM SevOne’s AI-Generated Cybersecurity Score
According to Rankiteo, IBM SevOne’s AI-generated cybersecurity score is 752, reflecting their Fair security posture.
How many security badges does IBM SevOne’ have ?
According to Rankiteo, IBM SevOne currently holds 0 security badges, indicating that no recognized compliance certifications are currently verified for the organization.
Does IBM SevOne have SOC 2 Type 1 certification ?
According to Rankiteo, IBM SevOne is not certified under SOC 2 Type 1.
Does IBM SevOne have SOC 2 Type 2 certification ?
According to Rankiteo, IBM SevOne does not hold a SOC 2 Type 2 certification.
Does IBM SevOne comply with GDPR ?
According to Rankiteo, IBM SevOne is not listed as GDPR compliant.
Does IBM SevOne have PCI DSS certification ?
According to Rankiteo, IBM SevOne does not currently maintain PCI DSS compliance.
Does IBM SevOne comply with HIPAA ?
According to Rankiteo, IBM SevOne is not compliant with HIPAA regulations.
Does IBM SevOne have ISO 27001 certification ?
According to Rankiteo,IBM SevOne is not certified under ISO 27001, indicating the absence of a formally recognized information security management framework.
Industry Classification of IBM SevOne
IBM SevOne operates primarily in the Computer Networking Products industry.
Number of Employees at IBM SevOne
IBM SevOne employs approximately 117 people worldwide.
Subsidiaries Owned by IBM SevOne
IBM SevOne presently has no subsidiaries across any sectors.
IBM SevOne’s LinkedIn Followers
IBM SevOne’s official LinkedIn profile has approximately 10,381 followers.
NAICS Classification of IBM SevOne
IBM SevOne is classified under the NAICS code 51125, which corresponds to Software Publishers.
IBM SevOne’s Presence on Crunchbase
Yes, IBM SevOne has an official profile on Crunchbase, which can be accessed here: https://www.crunchbase.com/organization/sevone.
IBM SevOne’s Presence on LinkedIn
Yes, IBM SevOne maintains an official LinkedIn profile, which is actively utilized for branding and talent engagement, which can be accessed here: https://www.linkedin.com/company/sevone-inc.
Cybersecurity Incidents Involving IBM SevOne
As of November 28, 2025, Rankiteo reports that IBM SevOne has experienced 14 cybersecurity incidents.
Number of Peer and Competitor Companies
IBM SevOne has an estimated 949 peer or competitor companies worldwide.
What types of cybersecurity incidents have occurred at IBM SevOne ?
Incident Types: The types of cybersecurity incidents that have occurred include Cyber Attack, Breach and Vulnerability.
What was the total financial impact of these incidents on IBM SevOne ?
Total Financial Loss: The total financial loss from these incidents is estimated to be $2.02 thousand.
How does IBM SevOne detect and respond to cybersecurity incidents ?
Detection and Response: The company detects and responds to cybersecurity incidents through an remediation measures with health checks of resources and contacting ibm cloud support, and communication strategy with messages sent to customers and apology issued by ibm japan, and remediation measures with replatforming (consolidating security tools), remediation measures with api-centric tool integration, remediation measures with adaptive capabilities (ml/behavioral analysis), remediation measures with automation for shared threat intelligence, and communication strategy with expert insights (techradar pro article), communication strategy with awareness of tool sprawl risks, and enhanced monitoring with continuous roi measurement (time-to-detect/respond), and remediation measures with verify url correctness, remediation measures with check access permissions, remediation measures with review waf/acl rules, remediation measures with clear cache/cookies, and recovery measures with restore access via correct credentials/permissions, recovery measures with update security policies if misconfigured, and communication strategy with reported to california office of the attorney general, and adaptive behavioral waf with possible (if the 403 is triggered by a waf rule)., and remediation measures with users advised to verify url spelling, check case sensitivity, or navigate from the ibm homepage., and remediation measures with verify url correctness, remediation measures with check case sensitivity, remediation measures with review access permissions, remediation measures with inspect waf/acl rules if internal, and recovery measures with redirect users to ibm homepage, recovery measures with provide alternative contact methods for support, and containment measures with sso with mfa, containment measures with ip allow/deny lists, containment measures with session timeouts, containment measures with device checks, containment measures with granular role-based permissions, containment measures with document watermarking, containment measures with print/download controls, containment measures with copy-paste suppression, containment measures with browser-only viewers, containment measures with built-in redaction, containment measures with drm for files, containment measures with ai boundaries, and remediation measures with tamper-evident audit logs, remediation measures with anomaly detection alerts, remediation measures with region-pinned data storage, remediation measures with third-party security certifications, and recovery measures with backup restoration protocols, recovery measures with self-contained audit archives, and enhanced monitoring with user activity analytics, enhanced monitoring with behavioral anomaly flags (e.g., rapid page views, mass downloads), and remediation measures with verify_page_permissions, remediation measures with check_waf_or_security_rules, remediation measures with review_access_logs_for_unauthorized_attempts, and recovery measures with restore_access_if_misconfigured, recovery measures with update_security_policies_if_needed, and remediation measures with suggested actions provided to users: verify url spelling, check case sensitivity, or navigate from the ibm homepage., and remediation measures with verify url correctness, remediation measures with check access permissions, remediation measures with review waf/acl rules, remediation measures with clear cache/cookies, and recovery measures with restore access via it support, recovery measures with update security policies if misconfigured, and remediation measures with verify url correctness, remediation measures with check case sensitivity, remediation measures with review access permissions, remediation measures with investigate waf/acl rules, remediation measures with test from alternate networks, and recovery measures with restore access via permission adjustments, recovery measures with update waf rules if misconfigured, recovery measures with communicate resolution to affected users, and communication strategy with suggested actions provided to end-users (e.g., verify url, visit ibm homepage)..
Incident Details
Can you provide details on each incident ?
Title: IBM Data Risk Manager Zero-Day Vulnerabilities
Description: Four zero-day vulnerabilities impacted the IBM Data Risk Manager (IDRM) after the company refused to patch bugs following a private bug disclosure attempt. The compromise of the product led to a full-scale company compromise, as the tool had credentials to access other security tools.
Type: Zero-Day Exploit
Attack Vector: Unpatched Vulnerability
Vulnerability Exploited: Four zero-day vulnerabilities in IBM Data Risk Manager
Title: IBM Cloud Outage and Critical Vulnerability
Description: IBM experienced a cloud outage and a critical-rated vulnerability in its QRadar threat detection and response tools and Cloud Pak for Security integration suite.
Date Detected: 2023-05-21
Date Resolved: 2023-05-21
Type: Outage and Vulnerability
Vulnerability Exploited: CVE-2025-2502
Title: Security Architecture Bloat and Fragmentation Leading to Increased Cybersecurity Risks
Description: The average organization now manages 83 security tools from 29 vendors, leading to rising complexity, tool sprawl, and mounting pressure on security teams. This fragmentation creates blind spots, slower threat detection (72 days longer), and weaker response times (84 days longer to contain threats), making it easier for attackers to exploit gaps. Traditional tools like Secure Email Gateways (SEGs) fail to block modern phishing attacks, with an average of 67.5 phishing emails evading SEGs per 100 mailboxes monthly. Smaller organizations are disproportionately affected, facing 7.5× more missed attacks than larger counterparts due to understaffing and misconfigured tools. Attack vectors include phishing (1/3 of breaches per Verizon DBIR), vendor scams, credential theft, and image-based phishing, which bypass static filtering and signature-based detection.
Date Publicly Disclosed: 2023-10-04T00:00:00Z
Type: Operational Risk
Attack Vector: Phishing (Email)Vendor ScamsCredential TheftImage-Based PhishingSocial Engineering
Vulnerability Exploited: Fragmented Security Tool IntegrationDefault Configurations in Security ToolsLack of API-Centric Threat Intelligence SharingStatic Filtering in SEGsSignature-Based Detection Gaps
Title: None
Description: IBM's report on the average cost of a data breach worldwide from May 2020 to February 2025, segmented by industry. The data highlights financial impacts across various sectors, emphasizing the escalating costs associated with cyber incidents over time.
Date Publicly Disclosed: 2025-08-12
Type: Data Breach Cost Analysis
Title: None
Description: A 403 Forbidden error was encountered when attempting to access an IBM page. Incident Number: 18.ceb0f748.1757485191.4eafbe3. The page could not be displayed, possibly due to access restrictions, misconfigured permissions, or a security measure (e.g., WAF blocking, IP restriction, or authentication failure).
Type: access_denial
Title: Unauthorized Access to Personal Information on IBM's Janssen CarePath Platform
Description: The California Office of the Attorney General reported that International Business Machines Corporation (IBM) experienced unauthorized access to personal information in their database used on the Janssen CarePath platform.
Date Publicly Disclosed: 2023-09-22
Type: Data Breach / Unauthorized Access
Title: None
Description: A 403 Forbidden error was encountered when attempting to access an IBM page. Incident Number: 18.85e41602.1758759830.50779d9f. The error suggests unauthorized or restricted access to the requested resource, which may indicate a misconfiguration, access control issue, or potential security incident (e.g., unauthorized probing, DDoS mitigation, or web application firewall (WAF) blocking).
Type: access_control_issue
Title: None
Description: A 403 Forbidden error was encountered when attempting to access an IBM page. Incident Number: 18.5c1e1202.1759343245.17fb734f. The page could not be displayed, possibly due to incorrect URL spelling, case sensitivity, or access restrictions.
Type: Access Denial / Unauthorized Access Attempt (403 Forbidden Error)
Title: None
Description: A 403 Forbidden error was encountered when attempting to access an IBM page. Incident Number: 18.561e1202.1761373223.528ac1d8. The page could not be displayed, possibly due to access restrictions, misconfigured permissions, or a security measure (e.g., WAF blocking).
Type: access_denial
Title: None
Description: The article discusses the rising importance of secure virtual data room (VDR) software in 2025 due to increasing data breach costs, regulatory scrutiny, and sophisticated cyber threats like ransomware and data theft. It highlights the need for robust security features in VDRs, including identity management, granular permissions, document controls, Q&A safeguards, anomaly detection, tamper-evident audit trails, data residency compliance, and secure AI integration. The context implies heightened risks in high-stakes dealmaking (M&A, financings, audits) where unsecured data rooms could expose sensitive information to breaches, leaks, or unauthorized AI processing. IBM’s 2024 *Cost of a Data Breach* and ENISA’s 2024 threat reports are cited as evidence of escalating cyber risks, emphasizing the financial and operational impacts of inadequate data protection.
Type: Data Breach Risk
Vulnerability Exploited: Loose Sharing PermissionsUncontrolled AI Tool IntegrationInadequate Access ControlsLack of Anomaly DetectionPoor Data Residency Enforcement
Title: None
Description: A 403 Forbidden error was encountered when attempting to access an IBM page. Incident Number: 18.c51e1202.1762367164.50da3b68. The page request was denied, possibly due to access restrictions, misconfigured permissions, or a security measure (e.g., WAF blocking, IP restrictions, or authentication failure).
Type: access_denial
Title: None
Description: A 403 Forbidden error was encountered when attempting to access an IBM page. Incident Number: 18.ceb0f748.1762453764.1d2b5fb7. The page could not be displayed, possibly due to incorrect URL spelling, case sensitivity, or access restrictions.
Type: Access Denial / Unauthorized Access Attempt (403 Forbidden Error)
Title: None
Description: A 403 Forbidden error was encountered when attempting to access an IBM page. Incident Number: 18.561e1202.1762842001.646fd49b. The page could not be displayed, possibly due to access restrictions, misconfigured permissions, or a security measure (e.g., WAF blocking, IP restriction, or authentication failure).
Type: access_denial
Title: None
Description: A 403 Forbidden error was encountered when attempting to access an IBM page. Incident Number: 18.6e3f655f.1762993875.3f8d8f64. The page could not be displayed, possibly due to access restrictions, misconfigured permissions, or a security measure (e.g., WAF blocking, IP restriction, or authentication failure).
Type: access_denial
What are the most common types of attacks the company has faced ?
Common Attack Types: The most common types of attacks the company has faced is Vulnerability.
How does the company identify the attack vectors used in incidents ?
Identification of Attack Vectors: The company identifies the attack vectors used in incidents through Phishing emails (1/3 of breaches)Vendor impersonationCredential theft.
Impact of the Incidents
What was the impact of each incident ?
Incident : Zero-Day Exploit IBM162291222
Data Compromised: Critical vulnerability information
Systems Affected: IBM Data Risk ManagerOther security tools
Operational Impact: Full-scale company compromise
Incident : Outage and Vulnerability IBM347060525
Systems Affected: IBM Cloud ConsoleSupport Cases
Downtime: ['2023-05-21 09:03 AM UTC', '2023-05-21 01:20 PM UTC']
Operational Impact: Users unable to access cloud resources and support cases
Brand Reputation Impact: Apologies issued by IBM Japan
Incident : Operational Risk IBM500090325
Systems Affected: Email Systems (SEGs)Endpoint SecurityIdentity Management
Operational Impact: 72-day longer threat detection84-day longer threat containmentIncreased operational risk due to tool sprawlStretched security teamsHigher response costs
Brand Reputation Impact: Reputational damage due to delayed breach detection/responsePerceived insecurity by customers/partners
Identity Theft Risk: ['Credential theft via phishing']
Incident : Data Breach Cost Analysis IBM1362513090425
Incident : access_denial IBM4262042091025
Systems Affected: unspecified_IBM_web_page
Downtime: temporary (until access is restored or issue is resolved)
Operational Impact: minor (limited to inability to access a specific page)
Brand Reputation Impact: low (unless part of a larger outage or targeted attack)
Incident : Data Breach / Unauthorized Access IBM040091825
Data Compromised: Personal information
Systems Affected: Janssen CarePath platform database
Identity Theft Risk: Potential (personal information exposed)
Incident : access_control_issue IBM2902429092525
Systems Affected: IBM webpage (unspecified)
Operational Impact: Potential disruption for users attempting to access the page; possible reputational risk if the error persists or is tied to a broader security issue.
Brand Reputation Impact: Minor to moderate (if perceived as a security lapse or poor user experience).
Incident : Access Denial / Unauthorized Access Attempt (403 Forbidden Error) IBM5092750100125
Systems Affected: Potential IBM web page or service associated with Incident Number: 18.5c1e1202.1759343245.17fb734f
Operational Impact: Possible disruption for users attempting to access the specific IBM page or resource.
Brand Reputation Impact: Minimal to none (likely an isolated access issue unless part of a broader pattern).
Incident : access_denial IBM4862048102525
Systems Affected: unspecified_IBM_web_page
Downtime: temporary (until access is restored or permissions corrected)
Operational Impact: minor (limited to inability to access a specific page)
Brand Reputation Impact: low (unless part of a broader outage or misconfiguration trend)
Incident : Data Breach Risk IBM5434154110425
Financial Loss: Potential high costs due to prolonged breach investigations, regulatory fines, and cleanup (cited from IBM’s 2024 *Cost of a Data Breach*).
Systems Affected: Virtual Data Rooms (VDRs)Sensitive Deal DocumentsAI Processing Tools
Operational Impact: Slowed dealmaking processes due to heightened scrutiny, manual reviews, and distrust in insecure VDRs.
Brand Reputation Impact: Risk of reputational damage if breaches occur due to inadequate VDR security, leading to loss of trust in dealmaking partners.
Legal Liabilities: Potential violations of data protection regulations (e.g., GDPR) due to uncontrolled data transfers or leaks.
Incident : access_denial IBM3792637110525
Systems Affected: unspecified_IBM_web_page
Operational Impact: potential_disruption_to_users_attempting_to_access_the_page
Brand Reputation Impact: minor (if users perceive instability or poor UX)
Incident : Access Denial / Unauthorized Access Attempt (403 Forbidden Error) IBM4593045110625
Systems Affected: Potential IBM web page or service (unconfirmed)
Operational Impact: Possible minor disruption for users attempting to access the specific IBM page.
Brand Reputation Impact: Minimal (if any), as this appears to be an isolated access error rather than a breach.
Incident : access_denial IBM3762037111125
Systems Affected: IBM webpage (unspecified)
Downtime: temporary (until access is restored or issue is resolved)
Operational Impact: minor (limited to inability to access a specific page)
Brand Reputation Impact: low (unless recurrent or part of a larger pattern)
Incident : access_denial IBM4803148111325
Systems Affected: unspecified_IBM_web_page
Downtime: temporary (until access is restored or issue is resolved)
Operational Impact: minor (limited to inability to access a specific page)
Brand Reputation Impact: low (unless part of a larger pattern or outage)
What is the average financial loss per incident ?
Average Financial Loss: The average financial loss per incident is $144.57.
What types of data are most commonly compromised in incidents ?
Commonly Compromised Data Types: The types of data most commonly compromised in incidents are Credentials (Via Phishing), Potential Pii (If Phishing Successful), , Personal Information, , Sensitive Deal Documents, Pii (Potential), Financial Records, Legal Contracts and .
Which entities were affected by each incident ?
Incident : Outage and Vulnerability IBM347060525
Entity Name: IBM
Entity Type: Corporation
Industry: Technology
Location: Global
Size: Large
Incident : Operational Risk IBM500090325
Entity Name: Average Organization (Generalized)
Entity Type: Enterprise, SME
Industry: Cross-Industry
Location: Global
Size: ['Small (higher risk)', 'Medium', 'Large']
Incident : Data Breach Cost Analysis IBM1362513090425
Entity Name: IBM (Report Publisher)
Entity Type: Organization
Industry: Technology/IT Services
Location: Global
Size: Large (350,000+ employees)
Incident : access_denial IBM4262042091025
Entity Name: IBM
Entity Type: corporation
Industry: technology
Location: global (HQ: Armonk, New York, USA)
Size: large
Incident : Data Breach / Unauthorized Access IBM040091825
Entity Name: International Business Machines Corporation (IBM)
Entity Type: Corporation
Industry: Technology / IT Services
Location: Armonk, New York, USA
Incident : Data Breach / Unauthorized Access IBM040091825
Entity Name: Janssen CarePath (platform under Johnson & Johnson)
Entity Type: Healthcare Platform
Industry: Pharmaceuticals / Healthcare
Incident : access_control_issue IBM2902429092525
Entity Name: IBM
Entity Type: corporation
Industry: technology
Location: global (headquartered in Armonk, New York, USA)
Size: large (350,000+ employees)
Incident : Access Denial / Unauthorized Access Attempt (403 Forbidden Error) IBM5092750100125
Entity Name: IBM
Entity Type: Corporation
Industry: Technology / IT Services
Location: Global (HQ: Armonk, New York, USA)
Size: Large (300,000+ employees)
Incident : access_denial IBM4862048102525
Entity Name: IBM
Entity Type: corporation
Industry: technology
Location: global (HQ: Armonk, New York, USA)
Size: large (350,000+ employees)
Incident : access_denial IBM3792637110525
Entity Name: IBM
Entity Type: corporation
Industry: technology
Location: global
Size: large
Incident : Access Denial / Unauthorized Access Attempt (403 Forbidden Error) IBM4593045110625
Entity Name: IBM
Entity Type: Corporation
Industry: Technology / IT Services
Location: Global (HQ: Armonk, New York, USA)
Size: Large (350,000+ employees as of latest reports)
Incident : access_denial IBM3762037111125
Entity Name: IBM
Entity Type: corporation
Industry: technology
Location: global (HQ: Armonk, New York, USA)
Size: large
Incident : access_denial IBM4803148111325
Entity Name: IBM
Entity Type: corporation
Industry: technology
Location: global (HQ: Armonk, New York, USA)
Size: large
Response to the Incidents
What measures were taken in response to each incident ?
Incident : Outage and Vulnerability IBM347060525
Remediation Measures: Health checks of resources and contacting IBM Cloud Support
Communication Strategy: Messages sent to customers and apology issued by IBM Japan
Incident : Operational Risk IBM500090325
Remediation Measures: Replatforming (consolidating security tools)API-centric tool integrationAdaptive capabilities (ML/behavioral analysis)Automation for shared threat intelligence
Communication Strategy: Expert Insights (TechRadar Pro article)Awareness of tool sprawl risks
Enhanced Monitoring: Continuous ROI measurement (time-to-detect/respond)
Incident : access_denial IBM4262042091025
Remediation Measures: verify URL correctnesscheck access permissionsreview WAF/ACL rulesclear cache/cookies
Recovery Measures: restore access via correct credentials/permissionsupdate security policies if misconfigured
Incident : Data Breach / Unauthorized Access IBM040091825
Communication Strategy: Reported to California Office of the Attorney General
Incident : access_control_issue IBM2902429092525
Adaptive Behavioral WAF: Possible (if the 403 is triggered by a WAF rule).
Incident : Access Denial / Unauthorized Access Attempt (403 Forbidden Error) IBM5092750100125
Remediation Measures: Users advised to verify URL spelling, check case sensitivity, or navigate from the IBM homepage.
Incident : access_denial IBM4862048102525
Remediation Measures: verify URL correctnesscheck case sensitivityreview access permissionsinspect WAF/ACL rules if internal
Recovery Measures: redirect users to IBM homepageprovide alternative contact methods for support
Incident : Data Breach Risk IBM5434154110425
Containment Measures: SSO with MFAIP Allow/Deny ListsSession TimeoutsDevice ChecksGranular Role-Based PermissionsDocument WatermarkingPrint/Download ControlsCopy-Paste SuppressionBrowser-Only ViewersBuilt-In RedactionDRM for FilesAI Boundaries
Remediation Measures: Tamper-Evident Audit LogsAnomaly Detection AlertsRegion-Pinned Data StorageThird-Party Security Certifications
Recovery Measures: Backup Restoration ProtocolsSelf-Contained Audit Archives
Enhanced Monitoring: User Activity AnalyticsBehavioral Anomaly Flags (e.g., rapid page views, mass downloads)
Incident : access_denial IBM3792637110525
Remediation Measures: verify_page_permissionscheck_WAF_or_security_rulesreview_access_logs_for_unauthorized_attempts
Recovery Measures: restore_access_if_misconfiguredupdate_security_policies_if_needed
Incident : Access Denial / Unauthorized Access Attempt (403 Forbidden Error) IBM4593045110625
Remediation Measures: Suggested actions provided to users: verify URL spelling, check case sensitivity, or navigate from the IBM homepage.
Incident : access_denial IBM3762037111125
Remediation Measures: verify URL correctnesscheck access permissionsreview WAF/ACL rulesclear cache/cookies
Recovery Measures: restore access via IT supportupdate security policies if misconfigured
Incident : access_denial IBM4803148111325
Remediation Measures: verify URL correctnesscheck case sensitivityreview access permissionsinvestigate WAF/ACL rulestest from alternate networks
Recovery Measures: restore access via permission adjustmentsupdate WAF rules if misconfiguredcommunicate resolution to affected users
Communication Strategy: suggested actions provided to end-users (e.g., verify URL, visit IBM homepage)
Data Breach Information
What type of data was compromised in each breach ?
Incident : Operational Risk IBM500090325
Type of Data Compromised: Credentials (via phishing), Potential pii (if phishing successful)
Sensitivity of Data: High (credentials)Medium (corporate email access)
Personally Identifiable Information: Potential (if phishing leads to account takeover)
Incident : Data Breach / Unauthorized Access IBM040091825
Type of Data Compromised: Personal information
Sensitivity of Data: High (personal information)
Incident : Data Breach Risk IBM5434154110425
Type of Data Compromised: Sensitive deal documents, Pii (potential), Financial records, Legal contracts
Sensitivity of Data: High (M&A, financings, audits, board matters)
Data Exfiltration: Risk highlighted due to loose permissions and unapproved AI tool usage.
File Types Exposed: PDFOffice DocumentsMedia Files
Personally Identifiable Information: Potential (if PII is stored in VDRs without proper controls).
What measures does the company take to prevent data exfiltration ?
Prevention of Data Exfiltration: The company takes the following measures to prevent data exfiltration: Health checks of resources and contacting IBM Cloud Support, Replatforming (consolidating security tools), API-centric tool integration, Adaptive capabilities (ML/behavioral analysis), Automation for shared threat intelligence, , verify URL correctness, check access permissions, review WAF/ACL rules, clear cache/cookies, , Users advised to verify URL spelling, check case sensitivity, or navigate from the IBM homepage., verify URL correctness, check case sensitivity, review access permissions, inspect WAF/ACL rules if internal, , Tamper-Evident Audit Logs, Anomaly Detection Alerts, Region-Pinned Data Storage, Third-Party Security Certifications, , verify_page_permissions, check_WAF_or_security_rules, review_access_logs_for_unauthorized_attempts, , Suggested actions provided to users: verify URL spelling, check case sensitivity, or navigate from the IBM homepage., verify URL correctness, check access permissions, review WAF/ACL rules, clear cache/cookies, , verify URL correctness, check case sensitivity, review access permissions, investigate WAF/ACL rules, test from alternate networks, .
How does the company handle incidents involving personally identifiable information (PII) ?
Handling of PII Incidents: The company handles incidents involving personally identifiable information (PII) through by sso with mfa, ip allow/deny lists, session timeouts, device checks, granular role-based permissions, document watermarking, print/download controls, copy-paste suppression, browser-only viewers, built-in redaction, drm for files, ai boundaries and .
Ransomware Information
How does the company recover data encrypted by ransomware ?
Data Recovery from Ransomware: The company recovers data encrypted by ransomware through restore access via correct credentials/permissions, update security policies if misconfigured, , redirect users to IBM homepage, provide alternative contact methods for support, , Backup Restoration Protocols, Self-Contained Audit Archives, , restore_access_if_misconfigured, update_security_policies_if_needed, , restore access via IT support, update security policies if misconfigured, , restore access via permission adjustments, update WAF rules if misconfigured, communicate resolution to affected users, .
Regulatory Compliance
Were there any regulatory violations and fines imposed for each incident ?
Incident : Data Breach / Unauthorized Access IBM040091825
Regulatory Notifications: California Office of the Attorney General
Incident : Data Breach Risk IBM5434154110425
Regulations Violated: Potential GDPR (Europe), Data Protection Laws (Cross-Border Transfers),
Lessons Learned and Recommendations
What lessons were learned from each incident ?
Incident : Operational Risk IBM500090325
Lessons Learned: Tool sprawl (83 tools from 29 vendors) increases complexity and risk, with 95% of leaders reporting redundant, unintegrated tools., Fragmentation leads to 72-day longer detection and 84-day longer containment, inflating costs and reputational damage., SEGs fail to block modern phishing (67.5 emails/month evade detection per 100 mailboxes), especially in understaffed SMEs., Default configurations and unintegrated tools create exploitable blind spots., AI/automation widens gaps when layered on disjointed architectures.
Incident : Data Breach Cost Analysis IBM1362513090425
Lessons Learned: The report underscores the critical need for robust cybersecurity measures across industries, with costs rising annually. Proactive investments in prevention, detection, and response capabilities are essential to mitigate financial and operational risks.
Incident : Data Breach Risk IBM5434154110425
Lessons Learned: Insecure VDRs expose organizations to financial, operational, and reputational risks during high-stakes dealmaking. Proactive security measures (e.g., granular permissions, audit trails, AI governance) are critical to mitigating breaches and ensuring regulatory compliance.
What recommendations were made to prevent future incidents ?
Incident : Outage and Vulnerability IBM347060525
Recommendations: Perform health checks of resources and contact IBM Cloud Support if issues persist
Incident : Operational Risk IBM500090325
Recommendations: Replatform: Consolidate tools into a unified, API-centric architecture with shared intelligence and automation., Start small: Focus on high-risk domains (e.g., email, endpoint, identity) before expanding., Prioritize adaptive tools: Use ML, behavioral analysis, and human feedback to counter evolving threats., Assess current stack: Inventory tools for overlap, integration gaps, and misconfigurations., Measure ROI: Track time-to-detect/respond to justify consolidation (101% ROI for platformized vs. 28% for fragmented)., Avoid 'more tools' mindset: Simplify to reduce operational burden and improve resilience.Replatform: Consolidate tools into a unified, API-centric architecture with shared intelligence and automation., Start small: Focus on high-risk domains (e.g., email, endpoint, identity) before expanding., Prioritize adaptive tools: Use ML, behavioral analysis, and human feedback to counter evolving threats., Assess current stack: Inventory tools for overlap, integration gaps, and misconfigurations., Measure ROI: Track time-to-detect/respond to justify consolidation (101% ROI for platformized vs. 28% for fragmented)., Avoid 'more tools' mindset: Simplify to reduce operational burden and improve resilience.Replatform: Consolidate tools into a unified, API-centric architecture with shared intelligence and automation., Start small: Focus on high-risk domains (e.g., email, endpoint, identity) before expanding., Prioritize adaptive tools: Use ML, behavioral analysis, and human feedback to counter evolving threats., Assess current stack: Inventory tools for overlap, integration gaps, and misconfigurations., Measure ROI: Track time-to-detect/respond to justify consolidation (101% ROI for platformized vs. 28% for fragmented)., Avoid 'more tools' mindset: Simplify to reduce operational burden and improve resilience.Replatform: Consolidate tools into a unified, API-centric architecture with shared intelligence and automation., Start small: Focus on high-risk domains (e.g., email, endpoint, identity) before expanding., Prioritize adaptive tools: Use ML, behavioral analysis, and human feedback to counter evolving threats., Assess current stack: Inventory tools for overlap, integration gaps, and misconfigurations., Measure ROI: Track time-to-detect/respond to justify consolidation (101% ROI for platformized vs. 28% for fragmented)., Avoid 'more tools' mindset: Simplify to reduce operational burden and improve resilience.Replatform: Consolidate tools into a unified, API-centric architecture with shared intelligence and automation., Start small: Focus on high-risk domains (e.g., email, endpoint, identity) before expanding., Prioritize adaptive tools: Use ML, behavioral analysis, and human feedback to counter evolving threats., Assess current stack: Inventory tools for overlap, integration gaps, and misconfigurations., Measure ROI: Track time-to-detect/respond to justify consolidation (101% ROI for platformized vs. 28% for fragmented)., Avoid 'more tools' mindset: Simplify to reduce operational burden and improve resilience.Replatform: Consolidate tools into a unified, API-centric architecture with shared intelligence and automation., Start small: Focus on high-risk domains (e.g., email, endpoint, identity) before expanding., Prioritize adaptive tools: Use ML, behavioral analysis, and human feedback to counter evolving threats., Assess current stack: Inventory tools for overlap, integration gaps, and misconfigurations., Measure ROI: Track time-to-detect/respond to justify consolidation (101% ROI for platformized vs. 28% for fragmented)., Avoid 'more tools' mindset: Simplify to reduce operational burden and improve resilience.
Incident : Data Breach Cost Analysis IBM1362513090425
Recommendations: Implement industry-specific cybersecurity frameworks tailored to high-risk sectors (e.g., healthcare, financial services)., Conduct regular cost-benefit analyses of security investments versus potential breach costs., Enhance employee training and incident response preparedness to reduce breach lifecycle durations., Leverage AI and automation for threat detection and response to lower average breach costs.Implement industry-specific cybersecurity frameworks tailored to high-risk sectors (e.g., healthcare, financial services)., Conduct regular cost-benefit analyses of security investments versus potential breach costs., Enhance employee training and incident response preparedness to reduce breach lifecycle durations., Leverage AI and automation for threat detection and response to lower average breach costs.Implement industry-specific cybersecurity frameworks tailored to high-risk sectors (e.g., healthcare, financial services)., Conduct regular cost-benefit analyses of security investments versus potential breach costs., Enhance employee training and incident response preparedness to reduce breach lifecycle durations., Leverage AI and automation for threat detection and response to lower average breach costs.Implement industry-specific cybersecurity frameworks tailored to high-risk sectors (e.g., healthcare, financial services)., Conduct regular cost-benefit analyses of security investments versus potential breach costs., Enhance employee training and incident response preparedness to reduce breach lifecycle durations., Leverage AI and automation for threat detection and response to lower average breach costs.
Incident : access_denial IBM4262042091025
Recommendations: Investigate whether the 403 error is due to a misconfiguration or a deliberate security block (e.g., DDoS protection, IP blacklisting)., Ensure web application firewalls (WAFs) and access control lists (ACLs) are properly tuned to avoid false positives., Monitor for patterns of unauthorized access attempts that may trigger such errors., Provide clear user guidance for troubleshooting 403 errors (e.g., checking URL typos, permissions, or VPN requirements).Investigate whether the 403 error is due to a misconfiguration or a deliberate security block (e.g., DDoS protection, IP blacklisting)., Ensure web application firewalls (WAFs) and access control lists (ACLs) are properly tuned to avoid false positives., Monitor for patterns of unauthorized access attempts that may trigger such errors., Provide clear user guidance for troubleshooting 403 errors (e.g., checking URL typos, permissions, or VPN requirements).Investigate whether the 403 error is due to a misconfiguration or a deliberate security block (e.g., DDoS protection, IP blacklisting)., Ensure web application firewalls (WAFs) and access control lists (ACLs) are properly tuned to avoid false positives., Monitor for patterns of unauthorized access attempts that may trigger such errors., Provide clear user guidance for troubleshooting 403 errors (e.g., checking URL typos, permissions, or VPN requirements).Investigate whether the 403 error is due to a misconfiguration or a deliberate security block (e.g., DDoS protection, IP blacklisting)., Ensure web application firewalls (WAFs) and access control lists (ACLs) are properly tuned to avoid false positives., Monitor for patterns of unauthorized access attempts that may trigger such errors., Provide clear user guidance for troubleshooting 403 errors (e.g., checking URL typos, permissions, or VPN requirements).
Incident : access_control_issue IBM2902429092525
Recommendations: Investigate whether the 403 error is due to a misconfiguration, overzealous security rule (e.g., WAF), or a targeted attack., Review access logs to determine if the error correlates with malicious activity (e.g., brute force, scanning)., Ensure proper error handling to avoid exposing incident IDs or internal details to end-users., Communicate transparently with users if the issue is widespread or tied to a security event.Investigate whether the 403 error is due to a misconfiguration, overzealous security rule (e.g., WAF), or a targeted attack., Review access logs to determine if the error correlates with malicious activity (e.g., brute force, scanning)., Ensure proper error handling to avoid exposing incident IDs or internal details to end-users., Communicate transparently with users if the issue is widespread or tied to a security event.Investigate whether the 403 error is due to a misconfiguration, overzealous security rule (e.g., WAF), or a targeted attack., Review access logs to determine if the error correlates with malicious activity (e.g., brute force, scanning)., Ensure proper error handling to avoid exposing incident IDs or internal details to end-users., Communicate transparently with users if the issue is widespread or tied to a security event.Investigate whether the 403 error is due to a misconfiguration, overzealous security rule (e.g., WAF), or a targeted attack., Review access logs to determine if the error correlates with malicious activity (e.g., brute force, scanning)., Ensure proper error handling to avoid exposing incident IDs or internal details to end-users., Communicate transparently with users if the issue is widespread or tied to a security event.
Incident : Access Denial / Unauthorized Access Attempt (403 Forbidden Error) IBM5092750100125
Recommendations: Verify URL accuracy and case sensitivity for IBM resources., Use the IBM homepage or search function to locate desired content., Monitor for patterns of 403 errors that may indicate broader access control issues.Verify URL accuracy and case sensitivity for IBM resources., Use the IBM homepage or search function to locate desired content., Monitor for patterns of 403 errors that may indicate broader access control issues.Verify URL accuracy and case sensitivity for IBM resources., Use the IBM homepage or search function to locate desired content., Monitor for patterns of 403 errors that may indicate broader access control issues.
Incident : access_denial IBM4862048102525
Recommendations: Audit web server access controls and WAF rules to prevent false positives., Implement user-friendly error pages with troubleshooting guidance., Monitor for patterns of 403 errors that may indicate targeted scanning or misconfigurations.Audit web server access controls and WAF rules to prevent false positives., Implement user-friendly error pages with troubleshooting guidance., Monitor for patterns of 403 errors that may indicate targeted scanning or misconfigurations.Audit web server access controls and WAF rules to prevent false positives., Implement user-friendly error pages with troubleshooting guidance., Monitor for patterns of 403 errors that may indicate targeted scanning or misconfigurations.
Incident : Data Breach Risk IBM5434154110425
Recommendations: Implement SSO with MFA and just-in-time user provisioning., Enforce role-based permissions with inheritance and reversible exceptions., Use document controls (watermarks, DRM, redaction, screenshot deterrents)., Route Q&A through approval workflows for sensitive disclosures., Deploy anomaly detection for unusual access patterns (e.g., off-hour activity)., Maintain tamper-evident, exportable audit logs with comprehensive metadata., Pin data storage to specific regions and document sub-processors., Restrict AI tool usage to governed environments with disable options., Test security controls regularly (e.g., simulated breach attempts)., Select VDR vendors with third-party security certifications.Implement SSO with MFA and just-in-time user provisioning., Enforce role-based permissions with inheritance and reversible exceptions., Use document controls (watermarks, DRM, redaction, screenshot deterrents)., Route Q&A through approval workflows for sensitive disclosures., Deploy anomaly detection for unusual access patterns (e.g., off-hour activity)., Maintain tamper-evident, exportable audit logs with comprehensive metadata., Pin data storage to specific regions and document sub-processors., Restrict AI tool usage to governed environments with disable options., Test security controls regularly (e.g., simulated breach attempts)., Select VDR vendors with third-party security certifications.Implement SSO with MFA and just-in-time user provisioning., Enforce role-based permissions with inheritance and reversible exceptions., Use document controls (watermarks, DRM, redaction, screenshot deterrents)., Route Q&A through approval workflows for sensitive disclosures., Deploy anomaly detection for unusual access patterns (e.g., off-hour activity)., Maintain tamper-evident, exportable audit logs with comprehensive metadata., Pin data storage to specific regions and document sub-processors., Restrict AI tool usage to governed environments with disable options., Test security controls regularly (e.g., simulated breach attempts)., Select VDR vendors with third-party security certifications.Implement SSO with MFA and just-in-time user provisioning., Enforce role-based permissions with inheritance and reversible exceptions., Use document controls (watermarks, DRM, redaction, screenshot deterrents)., Route Q&A through approval workflows for sensitive disclosures., Deploy anomaly detection for unusual access patterns (e.g., off-hour activity)., Maintain tamper-evident, exportable audit logs with comprehensive metadata., Pin data storage to specific regions and document sub-processors., Restrict AI tool usage to governed environments with disable options., Test security controls regularly (e.g., simulated breach attempts)., Select VDR vendors with third-party security certifications.Implement SSO with MFA and just-in-time user provisioning., Enforce role-based permissions with inheritance and reversible exceptions., Use document controls (watermarks, DRM, redaction, screenshot deterrents)., Route Q&A through approval workflows for sensitive disclosures., Deploy anomaly detection for unusual access patterns (e.g., off-hour activity)., Maintain tamper-evident, exportable audit logs with comprehensive metadata., Pin data storage to specific regions and document sub-processors., Restrict AI tool usage to governed environments with disable options., Test security controls regularly (e.g., simulated breach attempts)., Select VDR vendors with third-party security certifications.Implement SSO with MFA and just-in-time user provisioning., Enforce role-based permissions with inheritance and reversible exceptions., Use document controls (watermarks, DRM, redaction, screenshot deterrents)., Route Q&A through approval workflows for sensitive disclosures., Deploy anomaly detection for unusual access patterns (e.g., off-hour activity)., Maintain tamper-evident, exportable audit logs with comprehensive metadata., Pin data storage to specific regions and document sub-processors., Restrict AI tool usage to governed environments with disable options., Test security controls regularly (e.g., simulated breach attempts)., Select VDR vendors with third-party security certifications.Implement SSO with MFA and just-in-time user provisioning., Enforce role-based permissions with inheritance and reversible exceptions., Use document controls (watermarks, DRM, redaction, screenshot deterrents)., Route Q&A through approval workflows for sensitive disclosures., Deploy anomaly detection for unusual access patterns (e.g., off-hour activity)., Maintain tamper-evident, exportable audit logs with comprehensive metadata., Pin data storage to specific regions and document sub-processors., Restrict AI tool usage to governed environments with disable options., Test security controls regularly (e.g., simulated breach attempts)., Select VDR vendors with third-party security certifications.Implement SSO with MFA and just-in-time user provisioning., Enforce role-based permissions with inheritance and reversible exceptions., Use document controls (watermarks, DRM, redaction, screenshot deterrents)., Route Q&A through approval workflows for sensitive disclosures., Deploy anomaly detection for unusual access patterns (e.g., off-hour activity)., Maintain tamper-evident, exportable audit logs with comprehensive metadata., Pin data storage to specific regions and document sub-processors., Restrict AI tool usage to governed environments with disable options., Test security controls regularly (e.g., simulated breach attempts)., Select VDR vendors with third-party security certifications.Implement SSO with MFA and just-in-time user provisioning., Enforce role-based permissions with inheritance and reversible exceptions., Use document controls (watermarks, DRM, redaction, screenshot deterrents)., Route Q&A through approval workflows for sensitive disclosures., Deploy anomaly detection for unusual access patterns (e.g., off-hour activity)., Maintain tamper-evident, exportable audit logs with comprehensive metadata., Pin data storage to specific regions and document sub-processors., Restrict AI tool usage to governed environments with disable options., Test security controls regularly (e.g., simulated breach attempts)., Select VDR vendors with third-party security certifications.Implement SSO with MFA and just-in-time user provisioning., Enforce role-based permissions with inheritance and reversible exceptions., Use document controls (watermarks, DRM, redaction, screenshot deterrents)., Route Q&A through approval workflows for sensitive disclosures., Deploy anomaly detection for unusual access patterns (e.g., off-hour activity)., Maintain tamper-evident, exportable audit logs with comprehensive metadata., Pin data storage to specific regions and document sub-processors., Restrict AI tool usage to governed environments with disable options., Test security controls regularly (e.g., simulated breach attempts)., Select VDR vendors with third-party security certifications.
Incident : access_denial IBM3792637110525
Recommendations: Investigate whether the 403 error was intentional (e.g., security measure) or a misconfiguration., Review Web Application Firewall (WAF) or access control lists (ACLs) for overly restrictive rules., Monitor for patterns of unauthorized access attempts that may have triggered the block., Ensure clear error pages or redirects for users encountering access issues.Investigate whether the 403 error was intentional (e.g., security measure) or a misconfiguration., Review Web Application Firewall (WAF) or access control lists (ACLs) for overly restrictive rules., Monitor for patterns of unauthorized access attempts that may have triggered the block., Ensure clear error pages or redirects for users encountering access issues.Investigate whether the 403 error was intentional (e.g., security measure) or a misconfiguration., Review Web Application Firewall (WAF) or access control lists (ACLs) for overly restrictive rules., Monitor for patterns of unauthorized access attempts that may have triggered the block., Ensure clear error pages or redirects for users encountering access issues.Investigate whether the 403 error was intentional (e.g., security measure) or a misconfiguration., Review Web Application Firewall (WAF) or access control lists (ACLs) for overly restrictive rules., Monitor for patterns of unauthorized access attempts that may have triggered the block., Ensure clear error pages or redirects for users encountering access issues.
Incident : Access Denial / Unauthorized Access Attempt (403 Forbidden Error) IBM4593045110625
Recommendations: Verify URL accuracy and case sensitivity when accessing IBM pages., Use the IBM homepage as a starting point for navigation if access issues persist., Monitor for patterns of unauthorized access attempts (if this is part of a broader issue).Verify URL accuracy and case sensitivity when accessing IBM pages., Use the IBM homepage as a starting point for navigation if access issues persist., Monitor for patterns of unauthorized access attempts (if this is part of a broader issue).Verify URL accuracy and case sensitivity when accessing IBM pages., Use the IBM homepage as a starting point for navigation if access issues persist., Monitor for patterns of unauthorized access attempts (if this is part of a broader issue).
Incident : access_denial IBM3762037111125
Recommendations: Implement proper error handling for 403 pages to avoid confusion with security incidents., Review access control lists (ACLs) and web application firewall (WAF) rules to prevent false positives., Ensure clear communication channels for users encountering access issues.Implement proper error handling for 403 pages to avoid confusion with security incidents., Review access control lists (ACLs) and web application firewall (WAF) rules to prevent false positives., Ensure clear communication channels for users encountering access issues.Implement proper error handling for 403 pages to avoid confusion with security incidents., Review access control lists (ACLs) and web application firewall (WAF) rules to prevent false positives., Ensure clear communication channels for users encountering access issues.
Incident : access_denial IBM4803148111325
Recommendations: Implement user-friendly error pages with clear guidance for 403/404 errors., Review WAF/access control rules to minimize false positives., Monitor for patterns of unauthorized access attempts., Ensure URL case-sensitivity is documented for users.Implement user-friendly error pages with clear guidance for 403/404 errors., Review WAF/access control rules to minimize false positives., Monitor for patterns of unauthorized access attempts., Ensure URL case-sensitivity is documented for users.Implement user-friendly error pages with clear guidance for 403/404 errors., Review WAF/access control rules to minimize false positives., Monitor for patterns of unauthorized access attempts., Ensure URL case-sensitivity is documented for users.Implement user-friendly error pages with clear guidance for 403/404 errors., Review WAF/access control rules to minimize false positives., Monitor for patterns of unauthorized access attempts., Ensure URL case-sensitivity is documented for users.
What are the key lessons learned from past incidents ?
Key Lessons Learned: The key lessons learned from past incidents are Tool sprawl (83 tools from 29 vendors) increases complexity and risk, with 95% of leaders reporting redundant, unintegrated tools.,Fragmentation leads to 72-day longer detection and 84-day longer containment, inflating costs and reputational damage.,SEGs fail to block modern phishing (67.5 emails/month evade detection per 100 mailboxes), especially in understaffed SMEs.,Default configurations and unintegrated tools create exploitable blind spots.,AI/automation widens gaps when layered on disjointed architectures.The report underscores the critical need for robust cybersecurity measures across industries, with costs rising annually. Proactive investments in prevention, detection, and response capabilities are essential to mitigate financial and operational risks.Insecure VDRs expose organizations to financial, operational, and reputational risks during high-stakes dealmaking. Proactive security measures (e.g., granular permissions, audit trails, AI governance) are critical to mitigating breaches and ensuring regulatory compliance.
What recommendations has the company implemented to improve cybersecurity ?
Implemented Recommendations: The company has implemented the following recommendations to improve cybersecurity: Perform health checks of resources and contact IBM Cloud Support if issues persist.
References
Where can I find more information about each incident ?
Incident : Outage and Vulnerability IBM347060525
Source: IBM Security Bulletin
Incident : Operational Risk IBM500090325
Source: IBM and Palo Alto Networks Study
Incident : Operational Risk IBM500090325
Source: Verizon Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR)
Incident : Operational Risk IBM500090325
Source: TechRadar Pro Expert Insights (Eyal Benishti, IRONSCALES)
URL: https://www.techradar.com/news/submit-your-story-to-techradar-pro
Date Accessed: 2023-10-04
Incident : Data Breach Cost Analysis IBM1362513090425
Source: Statista
URL: https://www.statista.com/statistics/387861/cost-data-breach-by-industry/
Date Accessed: 2025-09-04
Incident : access_denial IBM4262042091025
Source: IBM Error Page
Incident : Data Breach / Unauthorized Access IBM040091825
Source: California Office of the Attorney General
Date Accessed: 2023-09-22
Incident : access_control_issue IBM2902429092525
Source: IBM Error Page
Incident : Access Denial / Unauthorized Access Attempt (403 Forbidden Error) IBM5092750100125
Source: IBM Error Page
Incident : access_denial IBM4862048102525
Source: IBM Error Page
Incident : Data Breach Risk IBM5434154110425
Source: IBM’s 2024 Cost of a Data Breach Report
Incident : Data Breach Risk IBM5434154110425
Source: ENISA’s 2024 Threat Landscape Report
Incident : access_denial IBM3792637110525
Source: IBM Error Page
Incident : Access Denial / Unauthorized Access Attempt (403 Forbidden Error) IBM4593045110625
Source: IBM Error Page
Incident : access_denial IBM3762037111125
Source: IBM Error Page
Incident : access_denial IBM4803148111325
Source: IBM Error Page
Where can stakeholders find additional resources on cybersecurity best practices ?
Additional Resources: Stakeholders can find additional resources on cybersecurity best practices at and Source: IBM Security Bulletin, and Source: IBM and Palo Alto Networks Study, and Source: Verizon Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR), and Source: TechRadar Pro Expert Insights (Eyal Benishti, IRONSCALES)Url: https://www.techradar.com/news/submit-your-story-to-techradar-proDate Accessed: 2023-10-04, and Source: StatistaUrl: https://www.statista.com/statistics/387861/cost-data-breach-by-industry/Date Accessed: 2025-09-04, and Source: IBM Error Page, and Source: California Office of the Attorney GeneralDate Accessed: 2023-09-22, and Source: IBM Error Page, and Source: IBM Error Page, and Source: IBM Error Page, and Source: IBM’s 2024 Cost of a Data Breach Report, and Source: ENISA’s 2024 Threat Landscape Report, and Source: IBM Error Page, and Source: IBM Error Page, and Source: IBM Error Page, and Source: IBM Error Page.
Investigation Status
What is the current status of the investigation for each incident ?
Incident : Operational Risk IBM500090325
Investigation Status: Ongoing (Industry-Wide Analysis)
Incident : Data Breach Cost Analysis IBM1362513090425
Investigation Status: Completed (Report Published)
Incident : access_denial IBM4262042091025
Investigation Status: unconfirmed (could be benign or indicative of a security event)
Incident : Data Breach / Unauthorized Access IBM040091825
Investigation Status: Reported; details pending
Incident : Access Denial / Unauthorized Access Attempt (403 Forbidden Error) IBM5092750100125
Investigation Status: Unclear (likely a routine access issue, not a confirmed cyber incident).
Incident : access_denial IBM4862048102525
Investigation Status: unconfirmed (could be benign access issue or security-related)
Incident : access_denial IBM3792637110525
Investigation Status: unconfirmed (error message only; no further details)
Incident : Access Denial / Unauthorized Access Attempt (403 Forbidden Error) IBM4593045110625
Investigation Status: Unconfirmed (likely a routine access error rather than a security incident).
Incident : access_denial IBM3762037111125
Investigation Status: unconfirmed (could be a false positive or legitimate access restriction)
Incident : access_denial IBM4803148111325
Investigation Status: unconfirmed (could be benign access issue or security-related)
How does the company communicate the status of incident investigations to stakeholders ?
Communication of Investigation Status: The company communicates the status of incident investigations to stakeholders through Messages sent to customers and apology issued by IBM Japan, Expert Insights (Techradar Pro Article), Awareness Of Tool Sprawl Risks, Reported to California Office of the Attorney General, Suggested Actions Provided To End-Users (E.G., Verify Url and Visit Ibm Homepage).
Stakeholder and Customer Advisories
Were there any advisories issued to stakeholders or customers for each incident ?
Incident : Outage and Vulnerability IBM347060525
Customer Advisories: Perform health checks of their resources and contact IBM Cloud Support if they continue to experience failures.
Incident : Operational Risk IBM500090325
Stakeholder Advisories: Security Leaders Urged To Replatform And Consolidate Tools To Reduce Risk..
Customer Advisories: Organizations advised to assess email security gaps (SEGs) and adopt adaptive defenses.
Incident : Access Denial / Unauthorized Access Attempt (403 Forbidden Error) IBM5092750100125
Customer Advisories: Suggested actions provided on the error page: verify URL spelling, use IBM homepage for navigation.
Incident : Data Breach Risk IBM5434154110425
Customer Advisories: Organizations are advised to evaluate VDR software based on security features that align with high-stakes dealmaking requirements, prioritizing governance, auditability, and risk mitigation.
Incident : Access Denial / Unauthorized Access Attempt (403 Forbidden Error) IBM4593045110625
Customer Advisories: Users were advised to check URL spelling or start from the IBM homepage.
Incident : access_denial IBM4803148111325
Customer Advisories: Users were advised to verify URL spelling, check case sensitivity, or visit the IBM homepage.
What advisories does the company provide to stakeholders and customers following an incident ?
Advisories Provided: The company provides the following advisories to stakeholders and customers following an incident: were Perform health checks of their resources and contact IBM Cloud Support if they continue to experience failures., Security Leaders Urged To Replatform And Consolidate Tools To Reduce Risk., Organizations Advised To Assess Email Security Gaps (Segs) And Adopt Adaptive Defenses., , Suggested actions provided on the error page: verify URL spelling, use IBM homepage for navigation., Organizations are advised to evaluate VDR software based on security features that align with high-stakes dealmaking requirements, prioritizing governance, auditability, and risk mitigation., Users were advised to check URL spelling or start from the IBM homepage., Users were advised to verify URL spelling, check case sensitivity and or visit the IBM homepage..
Initial Access Broker
How did the initial access broker gain entry for each incident ?
Incident : Operational Risk IBM500090325
Entry Point: Phishing Emails (1/3 Of Breaches), Vendor Impersonation, Credential Theft,
High Value Targets: Email Accounts, Corporate Credentials, Financial Systems,
Data Sold on Dark Web: Email Accounts, Corporate Credentials, Financial Systems,
Incident : Data Breach Risk IBM5434154110425
High Value Targets: M&A Documents, Financial Records, Board Materials,
Data Sold on Dark Web: M&A Documents, Financial Records, Board Materials,
Post-Incident Analysis
What were the root causes and corrective actions taken for each incident ?
Incident : Operational Risk IBM500090325
Root Causes: Over-Reliance On Bolt-On Security Tools Without Integration., Lack Of Api-Centric Threat Intelligence Sharing., Static Detection Methods (Segs) Unable To Counter Social Engineering., Understaffed Teams Unable To Maintain Tool Configurations., Default Settings And Unintegrated Tools Creating Blind Spots.,
Corrective Actions: Transition To Unified Cybersecurity Platforms (101% Roi)., Replace Segs With Api-Based, Adaptive Email Security., Automate Threat Intelligence Sharing Across Tools., Continuous Tuning Of Security Tools To Address Evolving Tactics., Prioritize Domains With Highest Threat Volume (E.G., Email).,
Incident : Data Breach Cost Analysis IBM1362513090425
Root Causes: Increasing Sophistication Of Cyber Threats., Expanding Attack Surfaces (E.G., Cloud Migration, Remote Work)., Regulatory Complexities And Compliance Costs., Shortage Of Skilled Cybersecurity Professionals.,
Incident : Access Denial / Unauthorized Access Attempt (403 Forbidden Error) IBM5092750100125
Root Causes: Possible Misconfigured Access Controls, Incorrect Url Input By User, Case-Sensitive Path Requirements,
Incident : Data Breach Risk IBM5434154110425
Root Causes: Inadequate Access Controls, Lack Of Activity Monitoring, Unsecured Data Sharing, Poor Data Residency Management, Unrestricted Ai Tool Integration,
Corrective Actions: Adopt Vdrs With Governed Workspaces And Predictive Security Controls., Enforce Least-Privilege Access And Just-In-Time Permissions., Implement Real-Time Anomaly Detection And Automated Containment., Ensure Tamper-Proof Audit Trails For Compliance And Dispute Resolution., Restrict Cross-Border Data Transfers To Compliant Storage Regions.,
Incident : Access Denial / Unauthorized Access Attempt (403 Forbidden Error) IBM4593045110625
Root Causes: Possible Misconfigured Access Permissions For The Specific Page., User Error (E.G., Incorrect Url Or Case Sensitivity)., Temporary Access Restriction (E.G., Maintenance Or Ip Blocking).,
Incident : access_denial IBM3762037111125
Root Causes: Potential Waf/Acl Misconfiguration, Incorrect Url Input, Session/Cookie Expiration, Ip-Based Restriction,
Corrective Actions: Audit Security Rules, Improve User Guidance For Errors, Log And Monitor 403 Events For Anomalies,
Incident : access_denial IBM4803148111325
Root Causes: Potential Causes: Misconfigured Permissions, Waf Rule Trigger, Ip/Geoblocking, Authentication Failure, Url Case Sensitivity,
What is the company's process for conducting post-incident analysis ?
Post-Incident Analysis Process: The company's process for conducting post-incident analysis is described as Continuous Roi Measurement (Time-To-Detect/Respond), , User Activity Analytics, Behavioral Anomaly Flags (E.G., Rapid Page Views, Mass Downloads), .
What corrective actions has the company taken based on post-incident analysis ?
Corrective Actions Taken: The company has taken the following corrective actions based on post-incident analysis: Transition To Unified Cybersecurity Platforms (101% Roi)., Replace Segs With Api-Based, Adaptive Email Security., Automate Threat Intelligence Sharing Across Tools., Continuous Tuning Of Security Tools To Address Evolving Tactics., Prioritize Domains With Highest Threat Volume (E.G., Email)., , Adopt Vdrs With Governed Workspaces And Predictive Security Controls., Enforce Least-Privilege Access And Just-In-Time Permissions., Implement Real-Time Anomaly Detection And Automated Containment., Ensure Tamper-Proof Audit Trails For Compliance And Dispute Resolution., Restrict Cross-Border Data Transfers To Compliant Storage Regions., , Audit Security Rules, Improve User Guidance For Errors, Log And Monitor 403 Events For Anomalies, .
Additional Questions
Incident Details
What was the most recent incident detected ?
Most Recent Incident Detected: The most recent incident detected was on 2023-05-21.
What was the most recent incident publicly disclosed ?
Most Recent Incident Publicly Disclosed: The most recent incident publicly disclosed was on 2023-09-22.
What was the most recent incident resolved ?
Most Recent Incident Resolved: The most recent incident resolved was on 2023-05-21.
Impact of the Incidents
What was the most significant data compromised in an incident ?
Most Significant Data Compromised: The most significant data compromised in an incident were Critical vulnerability information, , Personal Information and .
What was the most significant system affected in an incident ?
Most Significant System Affected: The most significant system affected in an incident was IBM Data Risk ManagerOther security tools and IBM Cloud ConsoleSupport Cases and Email Systems (SEGs)Endpoint SecurityIdentity Management and unspecified_IBM_web_page and Janssen CarePath platform database and IBM webpage (unspecified) and Potential IBM web page or service associated with Incident Number: 18.5c1e1202.1759343245.17fb734f and unspecified_IBM_web_page and Virtual Data Rooms (VDRs)Sensitive Deal DocumentsAI Processing Tools and unspecified_IBM_web_page and Potential IBM web page or service (unconfirmed) and IBM webpage (unspecified) and unspecified_IBM_web_page.
Response to the Incidents
What containment measures were taken in the most recent incident ?
Containment Measures in Most Recent Incident: The containment measures taken in the most recent incident was SSO with MFAIP Allow/Deny ListsSession TimeoutsDevice ChecksGranular Role-Based PermissionsDocument WatermarkingPrint/Download ControlsCopy-Paste SuppressionBrowser-Only ViewersBuilt-In RedactionDRM for FilesAI Boundaries.
Data Breach Information
What was the most sensitive data compromised in a breach ?
Most Sensitive Data Compromised: The most sensitive data compromised in a breach were Personal Information and Critical vulnerability information.
Lessons Learned and Recommendations
What was the most significant lesson learned from past incidents ?
Most Significant Lesson Learned: The most significant lesson learned from past incidents was AI/automation widens gaps when layered on disjointed architectures., The report underscores the critical need for robust cybersecurity measures across industries, with costs rising annually. Proactive investments in prevention, detection, and response capabilities are essential to mitigate financial and operational risks., Insecure VDRs expose organizations to financial, operational, and reputational risks during high-stakes dealmaking. Proactive security measures (e.g., granular permissions, audit trails, AI governance) are critical to mitigating breaches and ensuring regulatory compliance.
What was the most significant recommendation implemented to improve cybersecurity ?
Most Significant Recommendation Implemented: The most significant recommendation implemented to improve cybersecurity was Monitor for patterns of 403 errors that may indicate broader access control issues., Audit web server access controls and WAF rules to prevent false positives., Pin data storage to specific regions and document sub-processors., Enforce role-based permissions with inheritance and reversible exceptions., Restrict AI tool usage to governed environments with disable options., Verify URL accuracy and case sensitivity when accessing IBM pages., Implement user-friendly error pages with troubleshooting guidance., Measure ROI: Track time-to-detect/respond to justify consolidation (101% ROI for platformized vs. 28% for fragmented)., Leverage AI and automation for threat detection and response to lower average breach costs., Implement user-friendly error pages with clear guidance for 403/404 errors., Ensure web application firewalls (WAFs) and access control lists (ACLs) are properly tuned to avoid false positives., Investigate whether the 403 error was intentional (e.g., security measure) or a misconfiguration., Route Q&A through approval workflows for sensitive disclosures., Ensure clear error pages or redirects for users encountering access issues., Avoid 'more tools' mindset: Simplify to reduce operational burden and improve resilience., Maintain tamper-evident, exportable audit logs with comprehensive metadata., Communicate transparently with users if the issue is widespread or tied to a security event., Review access control lists (ACLs) and web application firewall (WAF) rules to prevent false positives., Monitor for patterns of 403 errors that may indicate targeted scanning or misconfigurations., Conduct regular cost-benefit analyses of security investments versus potential breach costs., Review WAF/access control rules to minimize false positives., Select VDR vendors with third-party security certifications., Monitor for patterns of unauthorized access attempts that may trigger such errors., Monitor for patterns of unauthorized access attempts., Use the IBM homepage or search function to locate desired content., Monitor for patterns of unauthorized access attempts that may have triggered the block., Investigate whether the 403 error is due to a misconfiguration or a deliberate security block (e.g., DDoS protection, IP blacklisting)., Test security controls regularly (e.g., simulated breach attempts)., Replatform: Consolidate tools into a unified, API-centric architecture with shared intelligence and automation., Review access logs to determine if the error correlates with malicious activity (e.g., brute force, scanning)., Review Web Application Firewall (WAF) or access control lists (ACLs) for overly restrictive rules., Deploy anomaly detection for unusual access patterns (e.g., off-hour activity)., Investigate whether the 403 error is due to a misconfiguration, overzealous security rule (e.g., WAF), or a targeted attack., Verify URL accuracy and case sensitivity for IBM resources., Perform health checks of resources and contact IBM Cloud Support if issues persist, Use document controls (watermarks, DRM, redaction, screenshot deterrents)., Use the IBM homepage as a starting point for navigation if access issues persist., Ensure URL case-sensitivity is documented for users., Assess current stack: Inventory tools for overlap, integration gaps, and misconfigurations., Ensure proper error handling to avoid exposing incident IDs or internal details to end-users., Implement proper error handling for 403 pages to avoid confusion with security incidents., Ensure clear communication channels for users encountering access issues., Start small: Focus on high-risk domains (e.g., email, endpoint, identity) before expanding., Enhance employee training and incident response preparedness to reduce breach lifecycle durations., Implement industry-specific cybersecurity frameworks tailored to high-risk sectors (e.g., healthcare, financial services)., Provide clear user guidance for troubleshooting 403 errors (e.g., checking URL typos, permissions, or VPN requirements)., Implement SSO with MFA and just-in-time user provisioning., Monitor for patterns of unauthorized access attempts (if this is part of a broader issue)., Prioritize adaptive tools: Use ML, behavioral analysis and and human feedback to counter evolving threats..
References
What is the most recent source of information about an incident ?
Most Recent Source: The most recent source of information about an incident are IBM Security Bulletin, IBM Error Page, IBM’s 2024 Cost of a Data Breach Report, Statista, TechRadar Pro Expert Insights (Eyal Benishti, IRONSCALES), IBM and Palo Alto Networks Study, California Office of the Attorney General, Verizon Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR) and ENISA’s 2024 Threat Landscape Report.
What is the most recent URL for additional resources on cybersecurity best practices ?
Most Recent URL for Additional Resources: The most recent URL for additional resources on cybersecurity best practices is https://www.techradar.com/news/submit-your-story-to-techradar-pro, https://www.statista.com/statistics/387861/cost-data-breach-by-industry/ .
Investigation Status
What is the current status of the most recent investigation ?
Current Status of Most Recent Investigation: The current status of the most recent investigation is Ongoing (Industry-Wide Analysis).
Stakeholder and Customer Advisories
What was the most recent stakeholder advisory issued ?
Most Recent Stakeholder Advisory: The most recent stakeholder advisory issued was Security leaders urged to replatform and consolidate tools to reduce risk., .
What was the most recent customer advisory issued ?
Most Recent Customer Advisory: The most recent customer advisory issued were an Perform health checks of their resources and contact IBM Cloud Support if they continue to experience failures., Organizations advised to assess email security gaps (SEGs) and adopt adaptive defenses., Suggested actions provided on the error page: verify URL spelling, use IBM homepage for navigation., Organizations are advised to evaluate VDR software based on security features that align with high-stakes dealmaking requirements, prioritizing governance, auditability, and risk mitigation., Users were advised to check URL spelling or start from the IBM homepage., Users were advised to verify URL spelling, check case sensitivity and or visit the IBM homepage.
Initial Access Broker
Post-Incident Analysis
What was the most significant root cause identified in post-incident analysis ?
Most Significant Root Cause: The most significant root cause identified in post-incident analysis was Over-reliance on bolt-on security tools without integration.Lack of API-centric threat intelligence sharing.Static detection methods (SEGs) unable to counter social engineering.Understaffed teams unable to maintain tool configurations.Default settings and unintegrated tools creating blind spots., Increasing sophistication of cyber threats.Expanding attack surfaces (e.g., cloud migration, remote work).Regulatory complexities and compliance costs.Shortage of skilled cybersecurity professionals., Possible misconfigured access controlsIncorrect URL input by userCase-sensitive path requirements, Inadequate Access ControlsLack of Activity MonitoringUnsecured Data SharingPoor Data Residency ManagementUnrestricted AI Tool Integration, Possible misconfigured access permissions for the specific page.User error (e.g., incorrect URL or case sensitivity).Temporary access restriction (e.g., maintenance or IP blocking)., potential WAF/ACL misconfigurationincorrect URL inputsession/cookie expirationIP-based restriction, potential causes: misconfigured permissions, WAF rule trigger, IP/geoblocking, authentication failure, URL case sensitivity.
What was the most significant corrective action taken based on post-incident analysis ?
Most Significant Corrective Action: The most significant corrective action taken based on post-incident analysis was Transition to unified cybersecurity platforms (101% ROI).Replace SEGs with API-based, adaptive email security.Automate threat intelligence sharing across tools.Continuous tuning of security tools to address evolving tactics.Prioritize domains with highest threat volume (e.g., email)., Adopt VDRs with governed workspaces and predictive security controls.Enforce least-privilege access and just-in-time permissions.Implement real-time anomaly detection and automated containment.Ensure tamper-proof audit trails for compliance and dispute resolution.Restrict cross-border data transfers to compliant storage regions., audit security rulesimprove user guidance for errorslog and monitor 403 events for anomalies.
.png)
Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)
Description
ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description
Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description
Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
References
Description
Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.
Description
Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.
Access Data Using Our API
Get company history
curl -i -X GET 'https://api.rankiteo.com/underwriter-getcompany-history?linkedin_id=sevone-inc' -H 'apikey: YOUR_API_KEY_HERE'
RapidWhat Do We Measure ?
Incident
Finding
Grade
Digital Assets
Every week, Rankiteo analyzes billions of signals to give organizations a sharper, faster view of emerging risks. With deeper, more actionable intelligence at their fingertips, security teams can outpace threat actors, respond instantly to Zero-Day attacks, and dramatically shrink their risk exposure window.
These are some of the factors we use to calculate the overall score:
Network Security
Identify exposed access points, detect misconfigured SSL certificates, and uncover vulnerabilities across the network infrastructure.
SBOM (Software Bill of Materials)
Gain visibility into the software components used within an organization to detect vulnerabilities, manage risk, and ensure supply chain security.
CMDB (Configuration Management Database)
Monitor and manage all IT assets and their configurations to ensure accurate, real-time visibility across the company's technology environment.
Threat Intelligence
Leverage real-time insights on active threats, malware campaigns, and emerging vulnerabilities to proactively defend against evolving cyberattacks.
Rankiteo is a unified scoring and risk platform that analyzes billions of signals weekly to help organizations gain faster, more actionable insights into emerging threats. Empowering teams to outpace adversaries and reduce exposure.
