Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

SETAOSETAO
VS
Bouygues ConstructionBouygues Construction
SETAO

SETAO

01 BP 925 Abidjan, Abidjan, 22 rue des foreurs Zone 3 , 00225, CI

Last Update: 29/11/2025

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.setao.ci/
765/1000Fair

𝐁𝐨𝐮𝐲𝐠𝐮𝐞𝐬 𝐂𝐨𝐧𝐬𝐭𝐫𝐮𝐜𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧 : 𝐁𝐚̂𝐭𝐢𝐫 𝐩𝐨𝐮𝐫 𝐥𝐚 𝐯𝐢𝐞 Chez Bouygues Construction, nous sommes 32 500 collaborateurs à travers le monde, tous animés par la plus grande et la plus enthousiasmante des responsabilités : bâtir pour la vie. Pour nos cli...

NAICS:23
NAICS Definition:Construction
Employees:86
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Bouygues Construction

Bouygues Construction

Challenger, Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines, 78 280, FR

Last Update: 15/09/2026

View Profile
791/1000Fair

Bouygues Construction employs 35,600 people around the world, all driven by the greatest and most exciting responsibility of all – building for life. For our customers in more than 50 countries, we deliver much more than projects. We build to create spaces, connectio...

NAICS:23
NAICS Definition:Construction
Employees:24,731
Subsidiaries:119
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
SETAO

SETAO

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Bouygues Construction

Bouygues Construction

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Construction Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for SETAO in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Construction Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Bouygues Construction in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - SETAO (X = Date, Y = Severity)

SETAO cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Bouygues Construction (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Bouygues Construction cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
SETAO

SETAO

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Bouygues Construction

Bouygues Construction

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between SETAO company and Bouygues Construction company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between SETAO company and Bouygues Construction company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between SETAO company and Bouygues Construction company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between SETAO company and Bouygues Construction company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between SETAO company and Bouygues Construction company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between SETAO company and Bouygues Construction company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between SETAO company and Bouygues Construction company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between SETAO company and Bouygues Construction company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between SETAO company and Bouygues Construction company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between SETAO company and Bouygues Construction company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between SETAO company and Bouygues Construction company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between SETAO and Bouygues Construction, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between SETAO and Bouygues Construction, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - SETAO or Bouygues Construction ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - SETAO or Bouygues Construction ?
Between SETAO and Bouygues Construction, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between SETAO and Bouygues Construction, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-85893
SUMMARY

Use after free in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-15
UPDATED
Date2026-09-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-69486
SUMMARY

Heap-based buffer overflow in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-15
UPDATED
Date2026-09-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2025-11395
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Podman. If an attacker can pass a crafted tar archive to the `podman load` command, they can create files on the host machine with the privileges of the user running Podman.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-15
UPDATED
Date2026-09-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
3.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
CVE-2026-92259
SUMMARY

Integer overflow or wraparound vulnerability in Samsung Opensource Escargot allows attackers with write access to the bytecode-cache directory to cause a heap-based buffer overflow and denial of service via a crafted cache file. This issue affects Escargot: ac94df78493ee6fede286620d94f724e46b4d238.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-15
UPDATED
Date2026-09-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-92257
SUMMARY

Netcore NR255-V version 1.5.130703 contains a stored cross-site scripting vulnerability in L7 content management pages that use eval() sinks, affecting the call board text and policy group handling components. Attackers can inject persistent script payloads through these pages to have malicious code executed in the context of other users viewing the affected content.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-15
UPDATED
Date2026-09-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
2.7
EXPLOITABILITY
2.3