Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

SERVIER Deutschland GmbHSERVIER Deutschland GmbH
VS
SUN PHARMASUN PHARMA
SERVIER Deutschland GmbH

SERVIER Deutschland GmbH

Elsenheimerstr. 53, None, München, Bayern, DE, 80687

Last Update: 12/02/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.servier.de
753/1000Fair

Servier ist ein privates, global agierendes und forschendes Pharmaunternehmen, das als private Stiftung geführt wird. Gegründet, um uns der Gesundheit und dem Wohl von Patient:innen zu verpflichten, leisten wir einen bedeutenden sozialen und gesellschaftlichen Beitrag s...

NAICS:3254
NAICS Definition:Pharmaceutical and Medicine Manufacturing
Employees:104
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
SUN PHARMA

SUN PHARMA

Sun House, CTS No. 201 B/1,, Mumbai, 400063, IN

Last Update: 12/09/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.sunpharma.com
811/1000Good

Sun Pharma is the world's fourth-largest speciality generic pharmaceutical company and No. 1 in India. We provide high-quality, affordable medicines trusted by customers and patients in over 100 countries. Sun Pharma's global presence is supported by more than 40 manufa...

NAICS:3254
NAICS Definition:Pharmaceutical and Medicine Manufacturing
Employees:44,544
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
SERVIER Deutschland GmbH

SERVIER Deutschland GmbH

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
SUN PHARMA

SUN PHARMA

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Pharmaceutical Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for SERVIER Deutschland GmbH in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Pharmaceutical Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for SUN PHARMA in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - SERVIER Deutschland GmbH (X = Date, Y = Severity)

SERVIER Deutschland GmbH cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - SUN PHARMA (X = Date, Y = Severity)

SUN PHARMA cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
SERVIER Deutschland GmbH

SERVIER Deutschland GmbH

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
SUN PHARMA

SUN PHARMA

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between SERVIER Deutschland GmbH company and SUN PHARMA company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between SERVIER Deutschland GmbH company and SUN PHARMA company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between SERVIER Deutschland GmbH company and SUN PHARMA company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between SERVIER Deutschland GmbH company and SUN PHARMA company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between SERVIER Deutschland GmbH company and SUN PHARMA company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between SERVIER Deutschland GmbH company and SUN PHARMA company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between SERVIER Deutschland GmbH company and SUN PHARMA company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between SERVIER Deutschland GmbH company and SUN PHARMA company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between SERVIER Deutschland GmbH company and SUN PHARMA company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between SERVIER Deutschland GmbH company and SUN PHARMA company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between SERVIER Deutschland GmbH company and SUN PHARMA company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between SERVIER Deutschland GmbH and SUN PHARMA, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between SERVIER Deutschland GmbH and SUN PHARMA, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - SERVIER Deutschland GmbH or SUN PHARMA ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - SERVIER Deutschland GmbH or SUN PHARMA ?
Between SERVIER Deutschland GmbH and SUN PHARMA, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between SERVIER Deutschland GmbH and SUN PHARMA, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-93740
SUMMARY

A vulnerability was identified in Totolink A3002MU Hh-B20211125.1046. Affected is the function formWlEncrypt of the file /boafrm/formWlEncrypt. The manipulation of the argument submit-url leads to buffer overflow. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit is publicly available and might be used.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-18
UPDATED
Date2026-09-18
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS2
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 9.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-93739
SUMMARY

A vulnerability was determined in Totolink A3002MU Hh-B20211125.1046. This impacts the function formWlAc of the file /boafrm/formWlAc. Executing a manipulation of the argument submit-url can lead to buffer overflow. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit has been publicly disclosed and may be utilized.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-18
UPDATED
Date2026-09-18
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.9)
CVSS2
Base Score: 9.0
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:C/I:C/A:C
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.1
CVE-2026-75885
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in the OpenShift console. Unauthenticated access to the `/api/devfile/` and `/api/devfile/samples/` endpoints allows a remote attacker to send crafted devfile payloads. This can lead to Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF), where the console pod makes requests to internal services and reflects partial responses to the attacker. Additionally, by sending repeated large requests without a specified content length, an attacker can cause unbounded memory growth, leading to a Denial of Service (DoS).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-18
UPDATED
Date2026-09-18
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
4.7
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-93894
SUMMARY

In Vinyl Cache before 9.0,2, workspace buffer overflow vulnerability was found in the .upper() and .lower() string type methods of VCL. This can be used as a remote denial of service (DoS) vector to make the child process segfault or assert, and then restart. Effectively exploiting this vulnerability requires prior knowledge about the VCL in use and the ability to craft a request that contains a string that is long enough to fill the remaining workspace at the call site while staying under the different request size limits (http_req_size, http_req_hdr_len, etc.).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-18
UPDATED
Date2026-09-18
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 2.3
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:N/R:A/V:D/RE:L/U:Clear
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-93738
SUMMARY

A vulnerability was found in Totolink A3002MU Hh-B20211125.1046. This affects the function formSchedule of the file /boafrm/formSchedule. Performing a manipulation of the argument webpage results in buffer overflow. The attack is possible to be carried out remotely. The exploit has been made public and could be used.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-18
UPDATED
Date2026-09-18
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.9)
CVSS2
Base Score: 9.0
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:C/I:C/A:C
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.1