Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

SERVIER Deutschland GmbHSERVIER Deutschland GmbH
VS
Dr. Reddy's LaboratoriesDr. Reddy's Laboratories
SERVIER Deutschland GmbH

SERVIER Deutschland GmbH

Elsenheimerstr. 53, None, München, Bayern, DE, 80687

Last Update: 12/02/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.servier.de
753/1000Fair

Servier ist ein privates, global agierendes und forschendes Pharmaunternehmen, das als private Stiftung geführt wird. Gegründet, um uns der Gesundheit und dem Wohl von Patient:innen zu verpflichten, leisten wir einen bedeutenden sozialen und gesellschaftlichen Beitrag s...

NAICS:3254
NAICS Definition:Pharmaceutical and Medicine Manufacturing
Employees:104
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Dr. Reddy's Laboratories

Dr. Reddy's Laboratories

Dr. Reddy's Laboratories Ltd. 8-2-337, Road No. 3, Banjara Hills, Hyderabad, TS, IN, 500034

Last Update: 03/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.drreddys.com
783/1000Fair

Established in 1984, we are a global pharmaceutical company headquartered in Hyderabad, India. Driven by our purpose of ‘Good Health Can’t Wait’, we work to provide access to affordable and innovative medicines. We offer a portfolio of products and services including AP...

NAICS:3254
NAICS Definition:Pharmaceutical and Medicine Manufacturing
Employees:31,653
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
SERVIER Deutschland GmbH

SERVIER Deutschland GmbH

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Dr. Reddy's Laboratories

Dr. Reddy's Laboratories

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Pharmaceutical Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for SERVIER Deutschland GmbH in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Pharmaceutical Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Dr. Reddy's Laboratories in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - SERVIER Deutschland GmbH (X = Date, Y = Severity)

SERVIER Deutschland GmbH cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Dr. Reddy's Laboratories (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Dr. Reddy's Laboratories cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
SERVIER Deutschland GmbH

SERVIER Deutschland GmbH

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Dr. Reddy's Laboratories

Dr. Reddy's Laboratories

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between SERVIER Deutschland GmbH company and Dr. Reddy's Laboratories company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between SERVIER Deutschland GmbH company and Dr. Reddy's Laboratories company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between SERVIER Deutschland GmbH company and Dr. Reddy's Laboratories company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between SERVIER Deutschland GmbH company and Dr. Reddy's Laboratories company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between SERVIER Deutschland GmbH company and Dr. Reddy's Laboratories company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between SERVIER Deutschland GmbH company and Dr. Reddy's Laboratories company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between SERVIER Deutschland GmbH company and Dr. Reddy's Laboratories company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between SERVIER Deutschland GmbH company and Dr. Reddy's Laboratories company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between SERVIER Deutschland GmbH company and Dr. Reddy's Laboratories company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between SERVIER Deutschland GmbH company and Dr. Reddy's Laboratories company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between SERVIER Deutschland GmbH company and Dr. Reddy's Laboratories company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between SERVIER Deutschland GmbH and Dr. Reddy's Laboratories, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between SERVIER Deutschland GmbH and Dr. Reddy's Laboratories, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - SERVIER Deutschland GmbH or Dr. Reddy's Laboratories ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - SERVIER Deutschland GmbH or Dr. Reddy's Laboratories ?
Between SERVIER Deutschland GmbH and Dr. Reddy's Laboratories, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between SERVIER Deutschland GmbH and Dr. Reddy's Laboratories, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-66064
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/handler.go sendFile handler opened files using a cleaned path but derived the authorization filename from raw req.URL.Path, so a trailing slash could bypass .goshs ACL-file protection and block-list checks. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-66063
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/updown.go multipart upload handler split part.FileName() on / but did not reject .., allowing an unauthenticated upload with filename .. to create a file outside the served tree. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-64863
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.4, the httpserver/server.go wdGuard handled WebDAV MOVE as a write-only method and did not enforce --no-delete, allowing WebDAV clients to delete or overwrite files via MOVE with Overwrite: T. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-62325
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. From 2.1.3 until 2.1.4, the sftpserver/sftpserver.go password handler used Username != "" && Password != "", so running goshs with -b 'admin:' -sftp and no -fkf left both SFTP authentication handlers unset and allowed unauthenticated file access. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-59921
SUMMARY

Netty is an asynchronous, event-driven network application framework. Prior to versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final, HttpPostRequestEncoder constructs multipart HTTP request bodies by directly concatenating user-supplied filenames and field names into Content-Disposition MIME headers without validating or sanitizing CRLF characters (\r\n). Since MIME headers are delimited by CRLF, an attacker who controls the filename can inject arbitrary MIME headers into the multipart body part. The root cause is that neither the encoder nor the FileUpload implementations' setFilename() methods, which only check for null, neutralize CRLF characters before the filename is embedded into the header. This issue has been fixed in versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1