Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Service management och tjänstevetenskap, Lunds universitetService management och tjänstevetenskap, Lunds universitet
VS
Technical University of MunichTechnical University of Munich
Service management och tjänstevetenskap, Lunds universitet

Service management och tjänstevetenskap, Lunds universitet

Universitetsplatsen 2, Helsingborg, Skåne, 252 25, SE

Last Update: 22/02/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
https://www.ses.lu.se/
749/1000Moderate

Institutionen för tjänstevetenskap vid Lunds universitet är en framgångsrik enhet för utbildning och forskning inom kundnära serviceorganisationer. Vi erbjuder utbildningar inom service management med spetskompetens inom detaljhandel, hållbarhet, hälsa, kreativa näringa...

NAICS:5417
NAICS Definition:Scientific Research and Development Services
Employees:12
Subsidiaries:20
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Technical University of Munich

Technical University of Munich

Arcisstraße 21, München, Munich, Bavaria, DE, 80333

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.tum.de/
781/1000Fair

Our university combines top-class facilities for cutting-edge research with unique learning opportunities for 52,000 students. Whether our researchers are investigating the origins of life, matter and the universe or looking for solutions to the major challenges for our...

NAICS:5417
NAICS Definition:Scientific Research and Development Services
Employees:11,505
Subsidiaries:5
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Service management och tjänstevetenskap, Lunds universitet

Service management och tjänstevetenskap, Lunds universitet

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Technical University of Munich

Technical University of Munich

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Research Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Service management och tjänstevetenskap, Lunds universitet in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Research Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Technical University of Munich in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Service management och tjänstevetenskap, Lunds universitet (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Service management och tjänstevetenskap, Lunds universitet cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Technical University of Munich (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Technical University of Munich cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Service management och tjänstevetenskap, Lunds universitet

Service management och tjänstevetenskap, Lunds universitet

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Technical University of Munich

Technical University of Munich

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Service management och tjänstevetenskap, Lunds universitet company and Technical University of Munich company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Service management och tjänstevetenskap, Lunds universitet company and Technical University of Munich company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Service management och tjänstevetenskap, Lunds universitet company and Technical University of Munich company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Service management och tjänstevetenskap, Lunds universitet company and Technical University of Munich company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Service management och tjänstevetenskap, Lunds universitet company and Technical University of Munich company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Service management och tjänstevetenskap, Lunds universitet company and Technical University of Munich company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Service management och tjänstevetenskap, Lunds universitet company and Technical University of Munich company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Service management och tjänstevetenskap, Lunds universitet company and Technical University of Munich company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Service management och tjänstevetenskap, Lunds universitet company and Technical University of Munich company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Service management och tjänstevetenskap, Lunds universitet company and Technical University of Munich company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Service management och tjänstevetenskap, Lunds universitet company and Technical University of Munich company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Service management och tjänstevetenskap, Lunds universitet and Technical University of Munich, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Service management och tjänstevetenskap, Lunds universitet and Technical University of Munich, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Service management och tjänstevetenskap, Lunds universitet or Technical University of Munich ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Service management och tjänstevetenskap, Lunds universitet or Technical University of Munich ?
Between Service management och tjänstevetenskap, Lunds universitet and Technical University of Munich, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Service management och tjänstevetenskap, Lunds universitet and Technical University of Munich, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-80138
SUMMARY

ClipBucket V5's web installer fails to properly validate or escape the php_cli_filepath parameter before passing it to shell execution. Unauthenticated attackers can submit a crafted POST request to the installer with a malicious php_cli_filepath value to execute arbitrary commands as the web server user.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-25
UPDATED
Date2026-08-25
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 9.2
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-79912
SUMMARY

A vulnerability was detected in TOTOLINK N600R 4.3.0cu.7647_B20210106. The impacted element is the function getCurrentTime of the file /cgi-bin/cstecgi.cgi. Performing a manipulation of the argument ntp_server results in command injection. The attack can be initiated remotely. The exploit is now public and may be used.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-25
UPDATED
Date2026-08-25
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.3)
CVSS2
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:L/SI:L/SA:L/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.7
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-79911
SUMMARY

A security vulnerability has been detected in TOTOLINK N600R 4.3.0cu.7647_B20210106. The affected element is the function setSystemConfig of the file /cgi-bin/cstecgi.cgi of the component CGI Handler. Such manipulation of the argument Hostname leads to stack-based buffer overflow. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed publicly and may be used.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-25
UPDATED
Date2026-08-25
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS2
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 9.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-70665
SUMMARY

Doorkeeper OpenID Connect implements an OpenID Connect authentication provider for Rails applications on top of Doorkeeper. Prior to 1.10.4, the Dynamic Client Registration (DCR) endpoint persists client-supplied scopes without validating them against the server's configured scope set. Under certain conditions, this allows a self-registered client to obtain scopes beyond what the server intended to grant. In DynamicClientRegistrationController#application_params, the scopes attribute is assigned directly from params[:scope] with no validation against Doorkeeper.configuration.scopes or optional_scopes. Combined with enforce_configured_scopes being off by default and Doorkeeper's ScopeChecker prioritizing application-level scopes over server-level scopes, this creates a privilege escalation path. This issue is fixed in version 1.10.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-25
UPDATED
Date2026-08-25
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.2)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.2
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
1.6
CVE-2026-55805
SUMMARY

Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ("Cross-site Scripting") vulnerability in Drupal Drupal core allows Stored XSS. This issue affects Drupal core versions: from 0.0.0 to 10.6.13, from 11.3.0 to 11.3.14, from 11.4.0 to 11.4.4, from 0.0.0 to 11.0.*, from 0.0.0 to 11.1.*, from 0.0.0 to 11.2.*.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-25
UPDATED
Date2026-08-25
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA