Comparison Overview
Service Canada

Service Canada
Canada, Canada, undefined, undefined, CA
Last Update: 03/04/2026
Nous sommes fiers d’être l’endroit où vont les Canadiens – que ce soit en ligne, par téléphone ou en personne – pour accéder aux programmes, aux services et aux prestations dont ils ont besoin du gouvernement du Canada et de ses nombreux partenaires. En 2022, nous av...

I WORK FOR SA
200, Victoria Square / Tarndanyangga, Adelaide, 5000, AU
Last Update: 01/04/2026
The OFFICIAL careers page for the South Australian Government. The South Australian Public Sector is the State's largest workforce. We are an employer of choice that reflects the diverse community we serve. Our people are from a range of backgrounds and vocations, fro...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Service Canada







I WORK FOR SA






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Service Canada in 2026.
Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for I WORK FOR SA in 2026.
Incident History - Service Canada (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Service Canada cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - I WORK FOR SA (X = Date, Y = Severity)
I WORK FOR SA cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Service Canada

I WORK FOR SA
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains a path traversal vulnerability in MultiAgentMonitor that fails to sanitize agent IDs when building file paths. Attackers can include traversal sequences like ../ in agent IDs to read, write, or overwrite arbitrary files, enabling sensitive disclosure, denial of service, or code execution.
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains an information disclosure vulnerability in the MultiAgentLedger component that allows attackers to access sensitive data by registering agents with duplicate IDs. Attackers can exploit the lack of agent ID uniqueness enforcement to share ledger instances and expose system prompts and conversation history between agents.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 contains a cross-origin agent execution vulnerability in the AGUI endpoint that allows remote attackers to trigger arbitrary agent execution. The POST /agui endpoint lacks authentication and hardcodes Access-Control-Allow-Origin: * headers, combined with Starlette's Content-Type-agnostic JSON parsing, enabling attackers to bypass CORS preflight checks via simple requests and exfiltrate sensitive agent responses including tool execution results and environment data.
PraisonAI before 4.5.128 contains an arbitrary shell command execution vulnerability where the UI modules hardcode approval_mode to auto, overriding administrator configuration from PRAISON_APPROVAL_MODE environment variable. Authenticated attackers can instruct the LLM agent to execute arbitrary shell commands via subprocess.run with shell=True, bypassing the manual approval gate and insufficient command sanitization blocklists.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 caches tool approval decisions by tool name only, not by invocation arguments, allowing subsequent execute_command calls to bypass approval prompts. Attackers can exploit this by obtaining initial approval for a benign command, then silently exfiltrate API keys and credentials via subsequent shell commands without user consent.