Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Service Autopilot by XplorService Autopilot by Xplor
VS
Booking.comBooking.com
Service Autopilot by Xplor

Service Autopilot by Xplor

950 East Paces Ferry Rd NE, Atlanta, Georgia, 30326, US

Last Update: 25/04/2026

View Profile
752/1000Fair

Put Your Service Business On Autopilot. Get Control of your time, scheduling, expenses, employees, marketing, profits and your life with software built for your business! Part of Xplor 🚀

NAICS:5112
NAICS Definition:Software Publishers
Employees:53
Subsidiaries:24
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Booking.com

Booking.com

Oosterdokskade 163, Amsterdam, 1011 DL, NL

Last Update: 13/09/2026

View Profile
464/1000Critical

A career at Booking.com is all about the journey, helping you explore new challenges in a place where you can be your best self. With plenty of exciting twists, turns and opportunities along the way. We’ve always been pioneers, on a mission to shape the future of trav...

NAICS:5112
NAICS Definition:Software Publishers
Employees:16,202
Subsidiaries:11
12-month incidents
4
Known data breaches
7
Attack type number
2

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Service Autopilot by Xplor

Service Autopilot by Xplor

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Booking.com

Booking.com

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Service Autopilot by Xplor in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)

Booking.com has 296.04% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - Service Autopilot by Xplor (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Service Autopilot by Xplor cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Booking.com (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Booking.com cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Service Autopilot by Xplor

Service Autopilot by Xplor

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Booking.com

Booking.com

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
AGOBOO1776904233
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
BOO1776206403
🔒 Incident : Breach
BOO1776112063

FAQ

Between Service Autopilot by Xplor company and Booking.com company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Service Autopilot by Xplor company and Booking.com company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Service Autopilot by Xplor company and Booking.com company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Service Autopilot by Xplor company and Booking.com company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Service Autopilot by Xplor company and Booking.com company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Service Autopilot by Xplor company and Booking.com company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Service Autopilot by Xplor company and Booking.com company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Service Autopilot by Xplor company and Booking.com company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Service Autopilot by Xplor company and Booking.com company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Service Autopilot by Xplor company and Booking.com company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Service Autopilot by Xplor company and Booking.com company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Service Autopilot by Xplor and Booking.com, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Service Autopilot by Xplor and Booking.com, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Service Autopilot by Xplor or Booking.com ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Service Autopilot by Xplor or Booking.com ?
Between Service Autopilot by Xplor and Booking.com, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Service Autopilot by Xplor and Booking.com, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-84411
SUMMARY

The web management service in affected RouterOS versions contains an integer underflow in its HTTP request body handling that is reachable before authentication. This can be leveraged by an unauthenticated network attacker to achieve arbitrary code execution as root, or to cause a denial of service, using a single crafted request.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-02
UPDATED
Date2026-10-02
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 9.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-105051
SUMMARY

Denuvo Anti-Tamper through 2026-03-04 allows bypass of a hypervisor presence check via CPUID interception (SimpleSvm.sys on AMD; hyperkd.sys and hyperhv.dll on Intel).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-02
UPDATED
Date2026-10-02
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 1.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 1.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
0.5
CVE-2026-105050
SUMMARY

PeaZip before 11.3.0, in a non-default configuration, is vulnerable to OS command injection via a filename in an archive because "quotation character already used in the string" is mishandled.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-02
UPDATED
Date2026-10-02
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 7.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-105049
SUMMARY

Zilliz Attu before 3.0.0 has a Playground feature that does not require authentication for proxying arbitrary HTTP and HTTPS requests to URLs on the public internet.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-02
UPDATED
Date2026-10-02
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-105048
SUMMARY

The Playground feature of Zilliz Attu before 3.0.0 allows SSRF (proxying of requests to private IP addresses).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-02
UPDATED
Date2026-10-02
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.0
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2