Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

SERNAC ChileSERNAC Chile
VS
Centers for Disease Control and PreventionCenters for Disease Control and Prevention
SERNAC Chile

SERNAC Chile

Santiago, CL

Last Update: 29/03/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
https://www.sernac.cl
703/1000Moderate

El Servicio Nacional del Consumidor (SERNAC) es la agencia del Estado de Chile, encargada de velar por la protección de los derechos de los consumidores, establecidos en la Ley N° 19.496. El SERNAC intercede o media en los conflictos de consumo entre las empresas y los...

NAICS:92
NAICS Definition:Public Administration
Employees:253
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

1600 Clifton Rd., Atlanta, 30333, US

Last Update: 04/04/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.cdc.gov
801/1000Good

CDC works 24/7 keeping America safe from health, safety and security threats, both foreign and domestic. Whether diseases start at home or abroad, are chronic or acute, curable or preventable, human error or deliberate attack, CDC fights it and supports communities and ...

NAICS:92
NAICS Definition:Public Administration
Employees:20,185
Subsidiaries:4
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
SERNAC Chile

SERNAC Chile

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for SERNAC Chile in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - SERNAC Chile (X = Date, Y = Severity)

SERNAC Chile cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
SERNAC Chile

SERNAC Chile

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
SER2154181122
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
CEN05319622

FAQ

Between SERNAC Chile company and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between SERNAC Chile company and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between SERNAC Chile company and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between SERNAC Chile company and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between SERNAC Chile company and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between SERNAC Chile company and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between SERNAC Chile company and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between SERNAC Chile company and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between SERNAC Chile company and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between SERNAC Chile company and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between SERNAC Chile company and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between SERNAC Chile and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between SERNAC Chile and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - SERNAC Chile or Centers for Disease Control and Prevention ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - SERNAC Chile or Centers for Disease Control and Prevention ?
Between SERNAC Chile and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between SERNAC Chile and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-59723
SUMMARY

Cline is an autonomous coding agent as an SDK, IDE extension, or CLI assistant. Prior to 3.0.30, the Cline Hub dashboard server launched by the cline dashboard command accepts WebSocket connections on the /browser endpoint without validating the Origin header, and when ROOM_SECRET is unset for local 127.0.0.1 binds, isAuthorizedBrowserRequest() allows attacker-controlled websites to send desktopCommand frames that read workspace state, mutate MCP and provider settings, and trigger command execution when a provider or model is configured. This issue is fixed in version 3.0.30.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
CVE-2026-54784
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. In version 1.9.0, CoreWCF SPNEGO SecurityContextToken negotiation can expose the proof key recovered from the RSTR when TransportWithMessageCredential with Windows client credentials and session establishment are used, allowing an observer to impersonate the authenticated Windows principal and decrypt or forge WS-SecureConversation traffic. This issue is fixed in version 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54783
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF WS-Security endorsing and supporting signature verification does not ensure the selected ds:Signature covers the expected Security header target, allowing an attacker with one captured signed SOAP envelope to replay arbitrary service operations as the victim principal. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54782
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML 1.1 and SAML 2.0 token validation does not correctly resolve the issuer signing key or require signed tokens when IdentityConfiguration is used with federated bindings, allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to impersonate any principal the trusted STS could issue. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-54781
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML token validation does not enforce SubjectConfirmation method URIs or holder-of-key proof keys in SamlSecurityTokenHandler, allowing holder-of-key downgrade or custom confirmation method assertions to authenticate a subject without proving authority over the assertion. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2