Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

SeqwaterSeqwater
VS
Hitachi EnergyHitachi Energy
Seqwater

Seqwater

117 Brisbane Street, Ipswich, 4305, AU

Last Update: 30/03/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.seqwater.com.au
742/1000Moderate

Seqwater – Supplying safe, secure and cost-effective bulk drinking water to South East Queenslanders Seqwater is the Queensland Government statutory authority responsible for delivering safe, secure and cost-effective bulk drinking water for more than 3 million people ...

NAICS:22
NAICS Definition:Utilities
Employees:995
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1
Hitachi Energy

Hitachi Energy

Brown-Boveri Strasse 5, Zurich, CH

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.hitachienergy.com
762/1000Fair

Hitachi Energy is a global technology leader in electrification, powering a sustainable energy future with innovative power grid technologies with digital at the core. Over three billion people depend on our technologies to power their daily lives. With over a century i...

NAICS:22
NAICS Definition:Utilities
Employees:35,103
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Seqwater

Seqwater

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Hitachi Energy

Hitachi Energy

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Utilities Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Seqwater in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Utilities Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Hitachi Energy in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Seqwater (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Seqwater cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Hitachi Energy (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Hitachi Energy cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Seqwater

Seqwater

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
SEQ125101122
Hitachi Energy

Hitachi Energy

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Data Leak
HIT15831023

FAQ

Between Seqwater company and Hitachi Energy company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Seqwater company and Hitachi Energy company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Seqwater company and Hitachi Energy company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Seqwater company and Hitachi Energy company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Seqwater company and Hitachi Energy company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Seqwater company and Hitachi Energy company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Seqwater company and Hitachi Energy company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Seqwater company and Hitachi Energy company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Seqwater company and Hitachi Energy company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Seqwater company and Hitachi Energy company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Seqwater company and Hitachi Energy company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Seqwater and Hitachi Energy, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Seqwater and Hitachi Energy, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Seqwater or Hitachi Energy ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Seqwater or Hitachi Energy ?
Between Seqwater and Hitachi Energy, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Seqwater and Hitachi Energy, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-74250
SUMMARY

In OpenStack Ironic before 38.0.1, the autodetect deploy interface may fail to run cleaning immediately after enrollment with, or changing to, the autodetect deploy interface.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.3
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-74247
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay. A user with FEATURE_BUILD_SUPPORT enabled and repository write access can exploit a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability within the build API. This allows the user to provide a malicious URL, causing the Quay builder to make requests to internal network addresses. Such an action could lead to the disclosure of sensitive internal information.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.2)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.2
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
1.6
CVE-2026-74245
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay's exported logs feature. An unauthenticated attacker with a valid file ID could download exported action logs without proper authorization. While file IDs are complex, they can be intercepted from plaintext email or webhook callbacks. This vulnerability leads to information disclosure, potentially exposing sensitive data such as usernames, email addresses, IP addresses, and action-specific metadata.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-74244
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay's Stripe billing webhook handler. This vulnerability allows an unauthenticated attacker to forge billing events by sending crafted JSON requests to the `/webhooks/stripe` endpoint without validating the Stripe-Signature header. Successful exploitation can lead to the unauthorized resetting of a namespace's build quota to its maximum and trigger unsolicited billing emails to namespace administrators.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-74243
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay. When the SECURITY_SCANNER_V4_PSK (pre-shared key) is not set, a remote unauthenticated attacker can send POST requests to the security scanner notification endpoint. This allows the attacker to flood the notification queue and inject path traversal characters into Clair API URL paths. The primary consequence is worker resource exhaustion and blind path manipulation on the configured Clair host, potentially leading to a denial of service.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9