Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Sequoia Employee Benefits & Insurance SolutionsSequoia Employee Benefits & Insurance Solutions
VS
MapfreMapfre
Sequoia Employee Benefits & Insurance Solutions

Sequoia Employee Benefits & Insurance Solutions

N/A

Last Update: 02/06/2026

View Profile
648/1000Poor

Our company is family owned and operated. We work as a team to proactively provide companies with unique and customized benefits programs to offer their employees. We work with companies of all sizes and have preferred access to many resources to bring the best product...

NAICS:524
NAICS Definition:Insurance Carriers and Related Activities
Employees:2
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
1
Mapfre

Mapfre

Carretera de Pozuelo, 52, Majadahonda, Community of Madrid, ES, 28220

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.mapfre.com
785/1000Fair

At Mapfre, we’ve spent more than 90 years supporting people and businesses around the world, taking care of what matters most to them. We offer insurance, financial, and service solutions that evolve with you. Our experience and commitment, combined with a constant focu...

NAICS:524
NAICS Definition:Insurance Carriers and Related Activities
Employees:37,331
Subsidiaries:4
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Sequoia Employee Benefits & Insurance Solutions

Sequoia Employee Benefits & Insurance Solutions

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Mapfre

Mapfre

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Insurance Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Sequoia Employee Benefits & Insurance Solutions in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Insurance Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Mapfre in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Sequoia Employee Benefits & Insurance Solutions (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Sequoia Employee Benefits & Insurance Solutions cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Mapfre (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Mapfre cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Sequoia Employee Benefits & Insurance Solutions

Sequoia Employee Benefits & Insurance Solutions

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
SEQ852072825
🔒 Incident : Breach
SEQ1780440141
Mapfre

Mapfre

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Sequoia Employee Benefits & Insurance Solutions company and Mapfre company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Sequoia Employee Benefits & Insurance Solutions company and Mapfre company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Sequoia Employee Benefits & Insurance Solutions company and Mapfre company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Sequoia Employee Benefits & Insurance Solutions company and Mapfre company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Sequoia Employee Benefits & Insurance Solutions company and Mapfre company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Sequoia Employee Benefits & Insurance Solutions company and Mapfre company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Sequoia Employee Benefits & Insurance Solutions company and Mapfre company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Sequoia Employee Benefits & Insurance Solutions company and Mapfre company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Sequoia Employee Benefits & Insurance Solutions company and Mapfre company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Sequoia Employee Benefits & Insurance Solutions company and Mapfre company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Sequoia Employee Benefits & Insurance Solutions company and Mapfre company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Sequoia Employee Benefits & Insurance Solutions and Mapfre, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Sequoia Employee Benefits & Insurance Solutions and Mapfre, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Sequoia Employee Benefits & Insurance Solutions or Mapfre ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Sequoia Employee Benefits & Insurance Solutions or Mapfre ?
Between Sequoia Employee Benefits & Insurance Solutions and Mapfre, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Sequoia Employee Benefits & Insurance Solutions and Mapfre, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-57980
SUMMARY

Authentication bypass using an alternate path or channel in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to perform tampering over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-56741
SUMMARY

JLine is a Java library for handling console input. Prior to 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1, the JLine3 Telnet server remote-telnet module does not apply an upper bound to terminal dimensions received via the Telnet NAWS option, and TelnetIO.handleNAWS() in TelnetIO.java:856-879 reads client-supplied width and height as 16-bit unsigned integers and passes values such as 65535x65535 to setTerminalGeometry(), allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to repeatedly alternate values and trigger continuous expensive rendering work that causes CPU exhaustion and denial of service. This issue is fixed in versions 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-56740
SUMMARY

JLine is a Java library for handling console input. Prior to 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1, the JLine3 Telnet server remote-telnet module does not limit the number of environment variables a client may inject via the Telnet NEW-ENVIRON option, and TelnetIO.readNEVariables() in TelnetIO.java:1127-1180 stores each variable pair in a HashMap held by ConnectionData, allowing an unauthenticated attacker to flood unique variable pairs before the terminating IAC SE byte and exhaust JVM heap memory with an OutOfMemoryError. This issue is fixed in versions 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-56171
SUMMARY

Exposure of private personal information to an unauthorized actor in Windows RDP allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-54335
SUMMARY

Feathersjs is a framework for creating web APIs and real-time applications with TypeScript or JavaScript. In 5.0.44 and earlier, the _.merge(target, source) utility exported by @feathersjs/commons recursively merges source into target by iterating Object.keys(source). When source was produced by JSON.parse and contains a __proto__, constructor, or prototype key, that key is returned as an own-enumerable property; the recursive merge then resolves target['__proto__'] to Object.prototype and writes attacker-supplied properties onto it, polluting the prototype for all plain objects in the process for the lifetime of the Node process. This issue is fixed in version 5.0.45.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.7
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2