Comparison Overview
SentryOne

SentryOne
4001 Yancey Rd, Charlotte, North Carolina, 28217, US
Last Update: 06/03/2026
SentryOne is a privately held technology company whose award-winning solutions empower Microsoft data professionals to achieve breakthrough performance across physical, virtual and cloud environments. Over the years, SentryOne has developed cutting-edge capabilities t...

SS&C Technologies
80 Lamberton Road, Windsor, CT, US, 06095
Last Update: 03/04/2026
SS&C is a leading global provider of mission-critical, cloud-based software and solutions for the financial and healthcare industries. Named to the Fortune 1000 list as a top U.S. company based on revenue, SS&C (NASDAQ: SSNC) is a trusted provider to more than 22,000 fi...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

SentryOne







SS&C Technologies






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for SentryOne in 2026.
Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for SS&C Technologies in 2026.
Incident History - SentryOne (X = Date, Y = Severity)
SentryOne cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - SS&C Technologies (X = Date, Y = Severity)
SS&C Technologies cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

SentryOne

SS&C Technologies
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
An issue in the SBN UDP interface of NASA cFS v7.0.1 allows attackers to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) via transmitting a crafted SBN frame.
A stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability exists in the cmd_edl function of OreSat Firmware v1.0. The vulnerability is triggered when processing the edl fw_flash command, where the <filename> argument is copied to a 64-byte stack buffer via memcpy without proper length validation. An attacker with physical access to the UART3 serial interface can exploit this vulnerability by sending a maliciously crafted command with an oversized filename parameter,
Adobe Campaign Classic (ACC) is affected by a Violation of Secure Design Principles vulnerability that could result in a Security feature bypass. An attacker could leverage this vulnerability to bypass security measures and gain unauthorized read access. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction.
Adobe Campaign Classic (ACC) is affected by an Incorrect Authorization vulnerability that could result in privilege escalation. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability to gain elevated privileges. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction.
Adobe Campaign Classic (ACC) is affected by a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could result in privilege escalation. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. Scope is changed.