Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

SentinelOneSentinelOne
VS
Palo Alto NetworksPalo Alto Networks
SentinelOne

SentinelOne

444 Castro St, Suite 400, Mountain View, California, US, 94041

Last Update: 15/09/2026

View Profile
Between 600 and 649
http://www.sentinelone.com
642/1000Poor

SentinelOne is the world's leading AI-powered cybersecurity platform. The SentinelOne Singularity platform, built on the first unified Data Lake, is revolutionizing security operations, with AI, solving use cases across Endpoint Protection, SIEM, Cloud Security, Identit...

NAICS:541514
NAICS Definition:Others
Employees:3,164
Subsidiaries:3
12-month incidents
2
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
2
Palo Alto Networks

Palo Alto Networks

3000 Tannery Way, SANTA CLARA, 95054, US

Last Update: 16/10/2026

View Profile
579/1000Very Poor

Palo Alto Networks, the global cybersecurity leader, is shaping the cloud-centric future with technology that is transforming the way people and organizations operate. Our mission is to be the cybersecurity partner of choice, protecting our digital way of life. We help ...

NAICS:541514
NAICS Definition:Others
Employees:22,839
Subsidiaries:8
12-month incidents
15
Known data breaches
6
Attack type number
4

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
SentinelOne

SentinelOne

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Palo Alto Networks

Palo Alto Networks

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Computer and Network Security Industry Avg (This Year)

SentinelOne has 98.02% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incidents vs Computer and Network Security Industry Avg (This Year)

Palo Alto Networks has 1370.59% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - SentinelOne (X = Date, Y = Severity)

SentinelOne cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Palo Alto Networks (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Palo Alto Networks cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
SentinelOne

SentinelOne

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
MICSENKASESECRO1782073479
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
CROMICBITSOPSENPROESEMCA1783117511
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
SEN1770818217
Palo Alto Networks

Palo Alto Networks

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
PAL1792139505
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
FORCHEMIKPALMICODIADOITR1789359970
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
NUCPALZYXWESSEC1790066961

FAQ

Between SentinelOne company and Palo Alto Networks company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between SentinelOne company and Palo Alto Networks company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between SentinelOne company and Palo Alto Networks company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between SentinelOne company and Palo Alto Networks company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between SentinelOne company and Palo Alto Networks company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between SentinelOne company and Palo Alto Networks company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between SentinelOne company and Palo Alto Networks company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between SentinelOne company and Palo Alto Networks company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between SentinelOne company and Palo Alto Networks company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between SentinelOne company and Palo Alto Networks company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between SentinelOne company and Palo Alto Networks company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between SentinelOne and Palo Alto Networks, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between SentinelOne and Palo Alto Networks, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - SentinelOne or Palo Alto Networks ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - SentinelOne or Palo Alto Networks ?
Between SentinelOne and Palo Alto Networks, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between SentinelOne and Palo Alto Networks, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-89096
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in nfs-utils. An unauthenticated remote attacker can trigger a Denial of Service (DoS) by sending repeated state notification requests to an exposed rpc.statd service. The service fails to properly release memory allocated during callback processing, leading to continuous memory growth. Sustained requests can exhaust system resources, eventually causing the service to degrade or crash.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-89088
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in parted. A heap-based buffer overflow exists in libparted's file system resizing logic when handling FAT16 volumes. By convincing a user or administrator to resize a specially crafted FAT16 file system image with malformed directory metadata, an attacker can trigger an oversized read into a fixed-size memory buffer. This issue causes memory corruption, resulting in an application crash and a denial of service (DoS).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-89085
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in parted. A heap-based buffer overflow can occur when processing a specially crafted FAT32 filesystem due to an integer calculation error during buffer allocation. A local attacker could exploit this by enticing a user or automated service to open a malicious filesystem image, resulting in an application crash leading to a Denial of Service (DoS) or potential memory corruption.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
4.7
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-17591
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in libarchive. An attacker can cause a Denial of Service (DoS) or potential information disclosure due to a use-after-free vulnerability, which occurs when a program reads memory that has already been released. This issue arises when the archive_entry_copy_mac_metadata() function deallocates an internal buffer before completing a data copy. An attacker who can supply input to an application utilizing this function can trigger the flaw to crash the application or read uninitialized memory data.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.6
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
1
CVE-2026-111802
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Nautilus. When a removable drive or disk image is unmounted or ejected, Nautilus prompts the user to empty the trash without verifying whether the trash directory paths are symbolic links. An attacker can exploit this flaw by tricking a user into mounting a crafted storage volume and confirming the prompt to empty the trash, leading to the arbitrary deletion of files accessible to that user.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
1.3