Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Senatsverwaltung für Bildung, Jugend und FamilieSenatsverwaltung für Bildung, Jugend und Familie
VS
Larsen & ToubroLarsen & Toubro
Senatsverwaltung für Bildung, Jugend und Familie

Senatsverwaltung für Bildung, Jugend und Familie

Bernhard-Weiß Straße 6, Berlin, 10178, DE

Last Update: 30/11/2025

View Profile
751/1000Fair

Die Senatsverwaltung für Bildung, Jugend und Familie (SenBJF) ist die oberste Landesbehörde für Bildungs,- Jugend- und Familienpolitik in Berlin. Die SenBJF ist dafür verantwortlich, dass alle Berlinerinnen und Berliner gute Bildungsmöglichkeiten haben – von der frühkin...

NAICS:92111
NAICS Definition:Executive Offices
Employees:1,675
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Larsen & Toubro

Larsen & Toubro

N.M.Marg, Ballard Estate, Mumbai, Maharashtra, IN, 400001

Last Update: 11/09/2026

View Profile
806/1000Good

Larsen & Toubro is an Indian multinational engaged in EPC Projects, Hi-Tech Manufacturing and Services. It operates in over 50 countries worldwide. A strong, customer-focused approach and the constant quest for top-class quality have enabled L&T to attain and sustain ...

NAICS:92111
NAICS Definition:Executive Offices
Employees:135,733
Subsidiaries:7
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Senatsverwaltung für Bildung, Jugend und Familie

Senatsverwaltung für Bildung, Jugend und Familie

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Larsen & Toubro

Larsen & Toubro

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Executive Offices Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Senatsverwaltung für Bildung, Jugend und Familie in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Executive Offices Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Larsen & Toubro in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Senatsverwaltung für Bildung, Jugend und Familie (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Senatsverwaltung für Bildung, Jugend und Familie cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Larsen & Toubro (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Larsen & Toubro cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Senatsverwaltung für Bildung, Jugend und Familie

Senatsverwaltung für Bildung, Jugend und Familie

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Larsen & Toubro

Larsen & Toubro

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Senatsverwaltung für Bildung, Jugend und Familie company and Larsen & Toubro company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Senatsverwaltung für Bildung, Jugend und Familie company and Larsen & Toubro company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Senatsverwaltung für Bildung, Jugend und Familie company and Larsen & Toubro company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Senatsverwaltung für Bildung, Jugend und Familie company and Larsen & Toubro company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Senatsverwaltung für Bildung, Jugend und Familie company and Larsen & Toubro company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Senatsverwaltung für Bildung, Jugend und Familie company and Larsen & Toubro company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Senatsverwaltung für Bildung, Jugend und Familie company and Larsen & Toubro company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Senatsverwaltung für Bildung, Jugend und Familie company and Larsen & Toubro company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Senatsverwaltung für Bildung, Jugend und Familie company and Larsen & Toubro company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Senatsverwaltung für Bildung, Jugend und Familie company and Larsen & Toubro company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Senatsverwaltung für Bildung, Jugend und Familie company and Larsen & Toubro company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Senatsverwaltung für Bildung, Jugend und Familie and Larsen & Toubro, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Senatsverwaltung für Bildung, Jugend und Familie and Larsen & Toubro, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Senatsverwaltung für Bildung, Jugend und Familie or Larsen & Toubro ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Senatsverwaltung für Bildung, Jugend und Familie or Larsen & Toubro ?
Between Senatsverwaltung für Bildung, Jugend und Familie and Larsen & Toubro, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Senatsverwaltung für Bildung, Jugend und Familie and Larsen & Toubro, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-16174
SUMMARY

Netskope was notified about a potential gap in Netskope Endpoint DLP (EPDLP) running on Windows systems. Successful exploitation of the gap could potentially allow a privileged user to send a crafted message to the EPDLP process port to trigger an integer overflow, leading to memory corruption. Successful exploitation would require the EPDLP module to be enabled in the client configuration, and that Memory Integrity is disabled. A successful exploit could potentially result in a denial-of-service, arbitrary code execution, or privilege escalation on the local machine.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:P/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-16172
SUMMARY

Netskope was notified of an out-of-bounds heap read affecting the Endpoint DLP (EPDLP) service of the Netskope Client. A local standard user could potentially send a specially crafted message that is not properly validated with a bounds check, likely crashing the kernel driver handler. Successful exploitation could potentially crash the EPDLP service, temporarily interrupting DLP enforcement. A successful exploit could potentially also reveal per-boot memory layout information to unauthorized users.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-87958
SUMMARY

IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 is vulnerable to a denial of service where a specific functionality on a Db2 server can be disabled by a privileged user under certain conditions.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-86093
SUMMARY

IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 could allow an attacker with the ability to control or impersonate a DRDA server endpoint to execute arbitrary commands on Db2 clients due to a stack-based buffer overflow that improperly copies user-controlled data into a fixed-size stack buffer without bounds checking.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
1.6
CVE-2026-86087
SUMMARY

IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 could allow an authenticated user to send a specially crafted request to write arbitrary files on the system.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8