Comparison Overview
Semiconductor Manufacturing Cybersecurity Consortium (SMCC)
Semiconductor Manufacturing Cybersecurity Consortium (SMCC)
673 S Milpitas Blvd, Milpitas, 95035, US
Last Update: 02/04/2026
SEMI SMCC's global reach extends all over the world and enables our members to connect and collaborate on specific issues and challenges affecting different regions. We focus on important key topics and seek to find solutions that will benefit the entire industry.
Samsung Semiconductor
N/A
Last Update: 01/04/2026
Established in 1974 as a subsidiary of Samsung Electronics, we’re proud to be recognized as one of the leading chip manufacturers in the world. Using our knowledge in semiconductor technology, our ambition is to spark the imagination of device manufacturers with top-of-...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Semiconductor Manufacturing Cybersecurity Consortium (SMCC)






Samsung Semiconductor






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Semiconductor Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Semiconductor Manufacturing Cybersecurity Consortium (SMCC) in 2026.
Incidents vs Semiconductor Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)
Samsung Semiconductor has 5.66% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incident History - Semiconductor Manufacturing Cybersecurity Consortium (SMCC) (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Semiconductor Manufacturing Cybersecurity Consortium (SMCC) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Samsung Semiconductor (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Samsung Semiconductor cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Semiconductor Manufacturing Cybersecurity Consortium (SMCC)
Samsung Semiconductor
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
A vulnerability exists in H.View IP cameras certificate-related upload interfaces allow authenticated users to store arbitrary file content to fixed, persistent filesystem locations without validating file type, structure, or size. This design omission enables the placement of unexpected or malformed data in locations intended for trusted certificate material, which could affect system integrity or behavior even after reboot.
A vulnerability exists in H.View IP cameras that could allow an authenticated user to supply unsanitized XML fields to the device's certificate generation interface, which are incorporated into a backend certificate creation command without proper input validation. This may allow for command execution with elevated privileges during certificate generation.
The DMP-5000 file service exposes authenticated arbitrary file upload functionality. There are exposed endpoints which allows authenticated users to upload files of any type without validation. No file extension filtering or content inspection is enforced which allows executable binaries and scripts to be accepted and written directly to the server.
The DMP-5000 devices are shipped with a default administrative web account with weak authentication controls, which are not required to be changed during initial configuration or operation. Using these accounts provides full system access.
Various versions of Daktronics Controller Firmware could allow authenticated and unauthenticated remote users to escape the intended directory and enumerate arbitrary file system paths.