Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

SegurCaixa AdeslasSegurCaixa Adeslas
VS
Progressive InsuranceProgressive Insurance
SegurCaixa Adeslas

SegurCaixa Adeslas

Paseo de la Castellana 259C, Madrid, 28046, ES

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
732/1000Moderate

SegurCaixa Adeslas es la compañía de No Vida líder en España en seguros de salud. Integrada en el Grupo Mutua Madrileña y participada por Caixabank, la compañía también opera en otros ramos como Hogar, Auto o Accidentes, entre otros. Controla el 10% del mercado españo...

NAICS:524
NAICS Definition:Insurance Carriers and Related Activities
Employees:2,179
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
Progressive Insurance

Progressive Insurance

300 North Commons Blvd, Mayfield Village, 44143, US

Last Update: 04/04/2026

View Profile
653/1000Weak

Every journey has a beginning, and wherever you are on your career path, we want to help you along the way. At Progressive, we exist to help people move forward and live fully. We strive to create a welcoming and flexible work environment for everyone, where employees ...

NAICS:524
NAICS Definition:Insurance Carriers and Related Activities
Employees:44,203
Subsidiaries:3
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
SegurCaixa Adeslas

SegurCaixa Adeslas

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Progressive Insurance

Progressive Insurance

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Insurance Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for SegurCaixa Adeslas in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Insurance Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Progressive Insurance in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - SegurCaixa Adeslas (X = Date, Y = Severity)

SegurCaixa Adeslas cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Progressive Insurance (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Progressive Insurance cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
SegurCaixa Adeslas

SegurCaixa Adeslas

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
SEG45819623
Progressive Insurance

Progressive Insurance

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
PRO3292632101525
🔒 Incident : Breach
PRO1014090725

FAQ

Between SegurCaixa Adeslas company and Progressive Insurance company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between SegurCaixa Adeslas company and Progressive Insurance company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between SegurCaixa Adeslas company and Progressive Insurance company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between SegurCaixa Adeslas company and Progressive Insurance company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between SegurCaixa Adeslas company and Progressive Insurance company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between SegurCaixa Adeslas company and Progressive Insurance company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between SegurCaixa Adeslas company and Progressive Insurance company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between SegurCaixa Adeslas company and Progressive Insurance company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between SegurCaixa Adeslas company and Progressive Insurance company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between SegurCaixa Adeslas company and Progressive Insurance company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between SegurCaixa Adeslas company and Progressive Insurance company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between SegurCaixa Adeslas and Progressive Insurance, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between SegurCaixa Adeslas and Progressive Insurance, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - SegurCaixa Adeslas or Progressive Insurance ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - SegurCaixa Adeslas or Progressive Insurance ?
Between SegurCaixa Adeslas and Progressive Insurance, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between SegurCaixa Adeslas and Progressive Insurance, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-66591
SUMMARY

Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') vulnerability in David Lingren Media LIbrary Assistant allows Stored XSS. This issue affects Media LIbrary Assistant: from n/a through 3.39.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-18
UPDATED
Date2026-08-18
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
3.7
EXPLOITABILITY
2.3
CVE-2026-66589
SUMMARY

Missing Authorization vulnerability in Kings Plugins B2BKing allows Exploiting Incorrectly Configured Access Control Security Levels. This issue affects B2BKing: from n/a through 5.2.30.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-18
UPDATED
Date2026-08-18
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-27365
SUMMARY

Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') vulnerability in PublishPress PublishPress Series allows Stored XSS. This issue affects PublishPress Series: from n/a through 2.17.0.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-18
UPDATED
Date2026-08-18
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
3.7
EXPLOITABILITY
1.7
CVE-2026-73974
SUMMARY

linuxfabrik-lib provides Python modules for database access, caching, shell execution, and API integrations, and Linuxfabrik Monitoring Plugins uses its shared testing helper across check plugins. Prior to linuxfabrik-lib 6.1.0 and Linuxfabrik Monitoring Plugins 7.0.0, lib.lftest.test() treated the first or second element of a --test CSV argument as a filesystem path and returned the file contents as simulated standard output or standard error without path confinement. The hidden but production-accessible --test argument was accepted by sudo-authorized plugins, so an attacker controlling the nagios or icinga account could use check-plugins/deb-updates/deb-updates with its default QUERY=1 to disclose every line of a root-readable file. Approximately 22 other plugins exposed filtered content or a root file existence and readability oracle through the same helper, while check-plugins/network-bonding/network-bonding and check-plugins/openstack-swift-stat/openstack-swift-stat had direct read paths that bypassed the helper. The library fix confines fixture reads to the invoking plugin's unit-test directory and refuses unsafe anchors, and the plugin fix routes the two bypasses through that helper. These issues are fixed in linuxfabrik-lib 6.1.0 and Linuxfabrik Monitoring Plugins 7.0.0.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-18
UPDATED
Date2026-08-18
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-73973
SUMMARY

Linuxfabrik Monitoring Plugins provides monitoring plugins for Icinga, Nagios, and related systems. Prior to version 7.0.0, check-plugins/logfile/logfile accepted a free-form --filename path and opened it as root when invoked through the shipped nagios or icinga sudoers allowlist, without confining the resolved path to /var/log. An attacker who controls the monitoring account can select a root-readable file such as /etc/shadow and use --warning-regex . while leaving SUPPRESS_OUTPUT false, causing each nonempty line to be collected in warn_matches and returned through lib.base.oao(). The vulnerable flow passes the expanded scan_path directly to open(), and neither real-path containment nor an allowlist protects the sink. The same fix also confines mysql-logfile and openvpn-client-list paths, allows only documented log roots, and resolves symlinks and parent-directory traversal before checking containment. This issue is fixed in version 7.0.0.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-18
UPDATED
Date2026-08-18
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8