Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

SecurentSecurent
VS
SM SupermallsSM Supermalls
Securent

Securent

New York, NY, US

Last Update: 31/01/2026

View Profile
798/1000Fair

Securent is re-writing the risk-model by powering more efficient and profitable mortgage transactions through comprehensive insurance programs that protects mortgage sellers, investors, and RMBS issuers against liability and losses introduced in the manufacturing proces...

NAICS:N/A
NAICS Definition:Others
Employees:5
Subsidiaries:2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
SM Supermalls

SM Supermalls

Mall of Asia Complex, Pasay City, 1300, PH

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
784/1000Fair

The SM Group of companies stands today as an institution, a store, a mall, a bank, a home, a resort, a hotel, and a place to see and experience with the family. One of the core business areas of the SM Group is the Shopping Center Management Corporation, generally ref...

NAICS:N/A
NAICS Definition:Others
Employees:13,749
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Securent

Securent

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
SM Supermalls

SM Supermalls

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Real Estate Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Securent in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Real Estate Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for SM Supermalls in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Securent (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Securent cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - SM Supermalls (X = Date, Y = Severity)

SM Supermalls cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Securent

Securent

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
SM Supermalls

SM Supermalls

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Securent company and SM Supermalls company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Securent company and SM Supermalls company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Securent company and SM Supermalls company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Securent company and SM Supermalls company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Securent company and SM Supermalls company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Securent company and SM Supermalls company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Securent company and SM Supermalls company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Securent company and SM Supermalls company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Securent company and SM Supermalls company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Securent company and SM Supermalls company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Securent company and SM Supermalls company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Securent and SM Supermalls, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Securent and SM Supermalls, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Securent or SM Supermalls ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Securent or SM Supermalls ?
Between Securent and SM Supermalls, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Securent and SM Supermalls, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-67978
SUMMARY

An issue in the SBN UDP interface of NASA cFS v7.0.1 allows attackers to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) via transmitting a crafted SBN frame.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-03
UPDATED
Date2026-08-03
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-67673
SUMMARY

A stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability exists in the cmd_edl function of OreSat Firmware v1.0. The vulnerability is triggered when processing the edl fw_flash command, where the <filename> argument is copied to a 64-byte stack buffer via memcpy without proper length validation. An attacker with physical access to the UART3 serial interface can exploit this vulnerability by sending a maliciously crafted command with an oversized filename parameter,

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-03
UPDATED
Date2026-08-03
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-48399
SUMMARY

Adobe Campaign Classic (ACC) is affected by a Violation of Secure Design Principles vulnerability that could result in a Security feature bypass. An attacker could leverage this vulnerability to bypass security measures and gain unauthorized read access. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-03
UPDATED
Date2026-08-03
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-48333
SUMMARY

Adobe Campaign Classic (ACC) is affected by an Incorrect Authorization vulnerability that could result in privilege escalation. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability to gain elevated privileges. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-03
UPDATED
Date2026-08-03
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-48331
SUMMARY

Adobe Campaign Classic (ACC) is affected by a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could result in privilege escalation. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. Scope is changed.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-03
UPDATED
Date2026-08-03
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9