Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

SECURENET-TECHSECURENET-TECH
VS
LexisNexisLexisNexis
SECURENET-TECH

SECURENET-TECH

London, London, SE1, GB

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
https://www.securenet-tech.net/
713/1000Moderate

Provide on-demand IT engineering, technical services, professional services, consultancy, IT support, managed services and cloud solutions. Service sand solutions to help our clients fill IT skills and knowledge gaps, manage existing IT infrastructure, help plan/design/...

NAICS:5415
NAICS Definition:Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
LexisNexis

LexisNexis

230 Park Avenue, Suite 7, New York City, NY, US, 10017

Last Update: 11/08/2026

View Profile
Between 0 and 549
https://www.lexisnexis.com/en-us/about-us/about-us.page
467/1000Critical

LexisNexis is a leading innovator of private, secure, and authoritative Legal AI solutions that help legal and business professionals draft full documents with ease, make informed decisions faster, and deliver outstanding work and improved outcomes, all powered by trust...

NAICS:5415
NAICS Definition:Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees:9,798
Subsidiaries:34
12-month incidents
4
Known data breaches
6
Attack type number
2

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
SECURENET-TECH

SECURENET-TECH

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
LexisNexis

LexisNexis

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for SECURENET-TECH in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

LexisNexis has 288.35% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - SECURENET-TECH (X = Date, Y = Severity)

SECURENET-TECH cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - LexisNexis (X = Date, Y = Severity)

LexisNexis cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
SECURENET-TECH

SECURENET-TECH

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
SEC431051124
LexisNexis

LexisNexis

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
VENLEX1786448387
🔒 Incident : Breach
RELLEX1772562253
🔒 Incident : Breach
LEX1772555037

FAQ

Between SECURENET-TECH company and LexisNexis company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between SECURENET-TECH company and LexisNexis company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between SECURENET-TECH company and LexisNexis company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between SECURENET-TECH company and LexisNexis company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between SECURENET-TECH company and LexisNexis company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between SECURENET-TECH company and LexisNexis company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between SECURENET-TECH company and LexisNexis company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between SECURENET-TECH company and LexisNexis company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between SECURENET-TECH company and LexisNexis company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between SECURENET-TECH company and LexisNexis company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between SECURENET-TECH company and LexisNexis company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between SECURENET-TECH and LexisNexis, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between SECURENET-TECH and LexisNexis, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - SECURENET-TECH or LexisNexis ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - SECURENET-TECH or LexisNexis ?
Between SECURENET-TECH and LexisNexis, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between SECURENET-TECH and LexisNexis, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-9693
SUMMARY

Mattermost versions 10.11.x <= 10.11.20, 11.7.x <= 11.7.5 Mattermost fails to remove thread membership records when a user is removed from or leaves a team, which allows a previously removed user who is later re-invited to the team to view private channel thread root post content and metadata via the team threads API.. Mattermost Advisory ID: MMSA-2026-00682

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-17
UPDATED
Date2026-08-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
REFERENCES
CVE-2026-75587
SUMMARY

Mattermost Desktop App versions <=6.2 6.2.2.0 fail to redact the pre-auth secret when generating a diagnostics report, which allows a local attacker with access to a user's diagnostics report or log files to obtain the plaintext pre-auth secret configured for a connected server via inspecting the Server Connectivity (Step-3) diagnostics output. Mattermost Advisory ID: MMSA-2026-00716

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-17
UPDATED
Date2026-08-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
REFERENCES
CVE-2026-75078
SUMMARY

A security flaw has been discovered in SourceCodester Class and Exam Timetabling System 1.0. This affects an unknown part of the file /BSHRM1.php. Performing a manipulation of the argument course results in cross site scripting. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. The exploit has been released to the public and may be used for attacks.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-17
UPDATED
Date2026-08-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS2
Base Score: 5.0
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 2.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
REFERENCES
CVE-2026-67961
SUMMARY

An issue in O2OA v.10.0.2 allows a local attacker to execute arbitrary code via the the sandbox mechanism of the Invoke script execution.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-17
UPDATED
Date2026-08-17
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
REFERENCES
CVE-2026-67919
SUMMARY

An issue in Halo 2.25.4 allows a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code via the PluginEndpoint.java, installFromUri method, and DefaultPluginApplicationContextFactory components

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-17
UPDATED
Date2026-08-17
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
REFERENCES