Comparison Overview

SECURENET-TECH

VS

EPAM Systems

SECURENET-TECH

London, London, London, GB, SE1
Last Update: 2025-12-10

Provide on-demand IT engineering, technical services, professional services, consultancy, IT support, managed services and cloud solutions. Service sand solutions to help our clients fill IT skills and knowledge gaps, manage existing IT infrastructure, help plan/design/implement and support new on-premise (hardware/software) solutions for migrations to cloud/manaed services.

NAICS: 5415
NAICS Definition: Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees: 0
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

EPAM Systems

41 University Drive Suite 202, Newtown, PA, US, 18940
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 750 and 799

Since 1993, EPAM Systems, Inc. (NYSE: EPAM) has used its software engineering expertise to become a leading global provider of digital engineering, cloud and AI-enabled transformation services, and a leading business and experience consulting partner for global enterprises and ambitious startups. We address our clients’ transformation challenges by fusing EPAM Continuum’s integrated strategy, experience and technology consulting with our 30+ years of engineering execution to speed our clients’ time to market and drive greater value from their innovations and digital investments. We leverage AI and GenAI to deliver transformative solutions that accelerate our clients’ digital innovation and enhance their competitive edge. Through platforms like EPAM AI/RUN™ and initiatives like DIALX Lab, we integrate advanced AI technologies into tailored business strategies, driving significant industry impact and fostering continuous innovation. We deliver globally, but engage locally with our expert teams of consultants, architects, designers and engineers, making the future real for our clients, our partners and our people around the world. We believe the right solutions are the ones that improve people’s lives and fuel competitive advantage for our clients across diverse industries. Our thinking comes to life in the experiences, products and platforms we design and bring to market. Added to the S&P 500 and the Forbes Global 2000 in 2021 and recognized by Glassdoor and Newsweek as Most Loved Workplace, our multidisciplinary teams serve customers across six continents. We are proud to be among the top 15 companies in Information Technology Services in the Fortune 1000 and to be recognized as a leader in the IDC MarketScapes for Worldwide Experience Build Services, Worldwide Experience Design Services and Worldwide Software Engineering Services. Learn more at www.epam.com.

NAICS: 5415
NAICS Definition: Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees: 58,003
Subsidiaries: 4
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/securenet-tech.jpeg
SECURENET-TECH
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/epam-systems.jpeg
EPAM Systems
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
SECURENET-TECH
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
EPAM Systems
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for SECURENET-TECH in 2025.

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for EPAM Systems in 2025.

Incident History — SECURENET-TECH (X = Date, Y = Severity)

SECURENET-TECH cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — EPAM Systems (X = Date, Y = Severity)

EPAM Systems cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/securenet-tech.jpeg
SECURENET-TECH
Incidents

Date Detected: 3/2023
Type:Ransomware
Attack Vector: Unknown vulnerability in software
Motivation: Financial gain
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/epam-systems.jpeg
EPAM Systems
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

EPAM Systems company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to SECURENET-TECH company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

SECURENET-TECH company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas EPAM Systems company has not reported any.

In the current year, EPAM Systems company and SECURENET-TECH company have not reported any cyber incidents.

SECURENET-TECH company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while EPAM Systems company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither EPAM Systems company nor SECURENET-TECH company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither EPAM Systems company nor SECURENET-TECH company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither SECURENET-TECH company nor EPAM Systems company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither SECURENET-TECH nor EPAM Systems holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

EPAM Systems company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to SECURENET-TECH company.

EPAM Systems company employs more people globally than SECURENET-TECH company, reflecting its scale as a IT Services and IT Consulting.

Neither SECURENET-TECH nor EPAM Systems holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither SECURENET-TECH nor EPAM Systems holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither SECURENET-TECH nor EPAM Systems holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither SECURENET-TECH nor EPAM Systems holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither SECURENET-TECH nor EPAM Systems holds HIPAA certification.

Neither SECURENET-TECH nor EPAM Systems holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N