Comparison Overview

SECURENET LTD

VS

GardaWorld

SECURENET LTD

None
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 750 and 799

None

NAICS: 5616
NAICS Definition: Investigation and Security Services
Employees: None
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

GardaWorld

2300 Émile-Bélanger, Saint-Laurent , Quebec, CA, H4R 3J4
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 700 and 749

GardaWorld is the world’s largest privately-owned security services company, offering cash services, physical and specialized security solutions, and with our Crisis24 portal, the dissemination of verified information related to international security. GardaWorld est la plus importante entreprise privée de sécurité au monde, offrant des services de transport de valeurs, des solutions de sécurité physique et spécialisée, et avec le portail Crisis24, la diffusion d’informations vérifiées en lien avec la sécurité internationale.

NAICS: 5616
NAICS Definition: Investigation and Security Services
Employees: 23,109
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
SECURENET LTD
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/gardaworld.jpeg
GardaWorld
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
SECURENET LTD
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
GardaWorld
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Security and Investigations Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for SECURENET LTD in 2025.

Incidents vs Security and Investigations Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for GardaWorld in 2025.

Incident History — SECURENET LTD (X = Date, Y = Severity)

SECURENET LTD cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — GardaWorld (X = Date, Y = Severity)

GardaWorld cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
SECURENET LTD
Incidents

Date Detected: 4/2023
Type:Vulnerability
Attack Vector: Unidentified Vulnerability
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/gardaworld.jpeg
GardaWorld
Incidents

Date Detected: 10/2023
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Unauthorized Access
Blog: Blog

FAQ

SECURENET LTD company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to GardaWorld company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

SECURENET LTD and GardaWorld have experienced a similar number of publicly disclosed cyber incidents.

In the current year, GardaWorld company and SECURENET LTD company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither GardaWorld company nor SECURENET LTD company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

GardaWorld company has disclosed at least one data breach, while SECURENET LTD company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither GardaWorld company nor SECURENET LTD company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

SECURENET LTD company has disclosed at least one vulnerability, while GardaWorld company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither SECURENET LTD nor GardaWorld holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither SECURENET LTD company nor GardaWorld company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Neither SECURENET LTD nor GardaWorld holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither SECURENET LTD nor GardaWorld holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither SECURENET LTD nor GardaWorld holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither SECURENET LTD nor GardaWorld holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither SECURENET LTD nor GardaWorld holds HIPAA certification.

Neither SECURENET LTD nor GardaWorld holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ImageMagick is free and open-source software used for editing and manipulating digital images. Prior to 7.1.2-9 and 6.9.13-34, there is a vulnerability in ImageMagick’s Magick++ layer that manifests when Options::fontFamily is invoked with an empty string. Clearing a font family calls RelinquishMagickMemory on _drawInfo->font, freeing the font string but leaving _drawInfo->font pointing to freed memory while _drawInfo->family is set to that (now-invalid) pointer. Any later cleanup or reuse of _drawInfo->font re-frees or dereferences dangling memory. DestroyDrawInfo and other setters (Options::font, Image::font) assume _drawInfo->font remains valid, so destruction or subsequent updates trigger crashes or heap corruption. This vulnerability is fixed in 7.1.2-9 and 6.9.13-34.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
Description

FeehiCMS version 2.1.1 has a Remote Code Execution via Unrestricted File Upload in Ad Management. FeehiCMS version 2.1.1 allows authenticated remote attackers to upload files that the server later executes (or stores in an executable location) without sufficient validation, sanitization, or execution restrictions. An authenticated remote attacker can upload a crafted PHP file and cause the application or web server to execute it, resulting in remote code execution (RCE).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

PHPGurukul Billing System 1.0 is vulnerable to SQL Injection in the admin/index.php endpoint. Specifically, the username parameter accepts unvalidated user input, which is then concatenated directly into a backend SQL query.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

NMIS/BioDose software V22.02 and previous versions contain executable binaries with plain text hard-coded passwords. These hard-coded passwords could allow unauthorized access to both the application and database.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:L
cvss4
Base: 8.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

NMIS/BioDose V22.02 and previous versions' installation directory paths by default have insecure file permissions, which in certain deployment scenarios can enable users on client workstations to modify the program executables and libraries.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 7.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X