Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

SEB PensionSEB Pension
VS
TATA AIG General Insurance Company LimitedTATA AIG General Insurance Company Limited
SEB Pension

SEB Pension

Bernstorffsgade 50, København C, 1577, DK

Last Update: 30/01/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.seb.dk/pension
753/1000Fair

SEB er en førende nordisk finanskoncern. Vi tror på, at nyskabende individer og innovative virksomheder er afgørende for at skabe en bedre verden. Vi er her for at hjælpe dem med at opnå deres mål og få succes i både gode og dårlige tider. We care for ambition. I Sveri...

NAICS:524
NAICS Definition:Insurance Carriers and Related Activities
Employees:259
Subsidiaries:7
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
TATA AIG General Insurance Company Limited

TATA AIG General Insurance Company Limited

15th floor , Tower A , Peninsula Business Park, Lower Parel, Mumbai , 400013, IN

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.tataaig.com
782/1000Fair

At TATA AIG General Insurance, we wear our achievements like a badge of honour – proudly and with gratitude! We have been recognized as one of India’s Top 100 Best Companies to Work For and among the Top 25 Best Workplaces in BFSI in 2024. As a joint venture between th...

NAICS:524
NAICS Definition:Insurance Carriers and Related Activities
Employees:13,728
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
SEB Pension

SEB Pension

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
TATA AIG General Insurance Company Limited

TATA AIG General Insurance Company Limited

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Insurance Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for SEB Pension in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Insurance Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for TATA AIG General Insurance Company Limited in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - SEB Pension (X = Date, Y = Severity)

SEB Pension cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - TATA AIG General Insurance Company Limited (X = Date, Y = Severity)

TATA AIG General Insurance Company Limited cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
SEB Pension

SEB Pension

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
TATA AIG General Insurance Company Limited

TATA AIG General Insurance Company Limited

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between SEB Pension company and TATA AIG General Insurance Company Limited company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between SEB Pension company and TATA AIG General Insurance Company Limited company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between SEB Pension company and TATA AIG General Insurance Company Limited company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between SEB Pension company and TATA AIG General Insurance Company Limited company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between SEB Pension company and TATA AIG General Insurance Company Limited company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between SEB Pension company and TATA AIG General Insurance Company Limited company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between SEB Pension company and TATA AIG General Insurance Company Limited company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between SEB Pension company and TATA AIG General Insurance Company Limited company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between SEB Pension company and TATA AIG General Insurance Company Limited company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between SEB Pension company and TATA AIG General Insurance Company Limited company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between SEB Pension company and TATA AIG General Insurance Company Limited company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between SEB Pension and TATA AIG General Insurance Company Limited, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between SEB Pension and TATA AIG General Insurance Company Limited, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - SEB Pension or TATA AIG General Insurance Company Limited ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - SEB Pension or TATA AIG General Insurance Company Limited ?
Between SEB Pension and TATA AIG General Insurance Company Limited, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between SEB Pension and TATA AIG General Insurance Company Limited, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-66064
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/handler.go sendFile handler opened files using a cleaned path but derived the authorization filename from raw req.URL.Path, so a trailing slash could bypass .goshs ACL-file protection and block-list checks. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-66063
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/updown.go multipart upload handler split part.FileName() on / but did not reject .., allowing an unauthenticated upload with filename .. to create a file outside the served tree. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-64863
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.4, the httpserver/server.go wdGuard handled WebDAV MOVE as a write-only method and did not enforce --no-delete, allowing WebDAV clients to delete or overwrite files via MOVE with Overwrite: T. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-62325
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. From 2.1.3 until 2.1.4, the sftpserver/sftpserver.go password handler used Username != "" && Password != "", so running goshs with -b 'admin:' -sftp and no -fkf left both SFTP authentication handlers unset and allowed unauthenticated file access. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-59921
SUMMARY

Netty is an asynchronous, event-driven network application framework. Prior to versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final, HttpPostRequestEncoder constructs multipart HTTP request bodies by directly concatenating user-supplied filenames and field names into Content-Disposition MIME headers without validating or sanitizing CRLF characters (\r\n). Since MIME headers are delimited by CRLF, an attacker who controls the filename can inject arbitrary MIME headers into the multipart body part. The root cause is that neither the encoder nor the FileUpload implementations' setFilename() methods, which only check for null, neutralize CRLF characters before the filename is embedded into the header. This issue has been fixed in versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1