Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Seasons 52 RestaurantSeasons 52 Restaurant
VS
Brinker InternationalBrinker International
Seasons 52 Restaurant

Seasons 52 Restaurant

undefined, undefined, undefined, undefined, US

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.seasons52.com
767/1000Fair

The Best of Each Season. Straight to Your Table. Seasons 52 is a celebration of what’s good now. Seasonally inspired menus featuring ingredients at their peak of freshness. Rustic cooking techniques like brick oven roasting and open-fire grilling that bring out natura...

NAICS:7225
NAICS Definition:Restaurants and Other Eating Places
Employees:1,169
Subsidiaries:9
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Brinker International

Brinker International

3000 Olympus Blvd, Dallas, 75019, US

Last Update: 03/09/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.brinkerjobs.com
783/1000Fair

Dallas-based Brinker International, Inc. is one of the world’s leading casual dining restaurant companies. Founded in 1975, Brinker owns, operates or franchises more than 1,600 restaurants across 29 countries and two territories under the names Chili’s® Grill & Bar and ...

NAICS:7225
NAICS Definition:Restaurants and Other Eating Places
Employees:40,532
Subsidiaries:2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Seasons 52 Restaurant

Seasons 52 Restaurant

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Brinker International

Brinker International

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Restaurants Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Seasons 52 Restaurant in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Restaurants Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Brinker International in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Seasons 52 Restaurant (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Seasons 52 Restaurant cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Brinker International (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Brinker International cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Seasons 52 Restaurant

Seasons 52 Restaurant

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Brinker International

Brinker International

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
BRI138072825

FAQ

Between Seasons 52 Restaurant company and Brinker International company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Seasons 52 Restaurant company and Brinker International company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Seasons 52 Restaurant company and Brinker International company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Seasons 52 Restaurant company and Brinker International company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Seasons 52 Restaurant company and Brinker International company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Seasons 52 Restaurant company and Brinker International company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Seasons 52 Restaurant company and Brinker International company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Seasons 52 Restaurant company and Brinker International company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Seasons 52 Restaurant company and Brinker International company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Seasons 52 Restaurant company and Brinker International company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Seasons 52 Restaurant company and Brinker International company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Seasons 52 Restaurant and Brinker International, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Seasons 52 Restaurant and Brinker International, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Seasons 52 Restaurant or Brinker International ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Seasons 52 Restaurant or Brinker International ?
Between Seasons 52 Restaurant and Brinker International, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Seasons 52 Restaurant and Brinker International, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-16174
SUMMARY

Netskope was notified about a potential gap in Netskope Endpoint DLP (EPDLP) running on Windows systems. Successful exploitation of the gap could potentially allow a privileged user to send a crafted message to the EPDLP process port to trigger an integer overflow, leading to memory corruption. Successful exploitation would require the EPDLP module to be enabled in the client configuration, and that Memory Integrity is disabled. A successful exploit could potentially result in a denial-of-service, arbitrary code execution, or privilege escalation on the local machine.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:P/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-16172
SUMMARY

Netskope was notified of an out-of-bounds heap read affecting the Endpoint DLP (EPDLP) service of the Netskope Client. A local standard user could potentially send a specially crafted message that is not properly validated with a bounds check, likely crashing the kernel driver handler. Successful exploitation could potentially crash the EPDLP service, temporarily interrupting DLP enforcement. A successful exploit could potentially also reveal per-boot memory layout information to unauthorized users.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-87958
SUMMARY

IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 is vulnerable to a denial of service where a specific functionality on a Db2 server can be disabled by a privileged user under certain conditions.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-86093
SUMMARY

IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 could allow an attacker with the ability to control or impersonate a DRDA server endpoint to execute arbitrary commands on Db2 clients due to a stack-based buffer overflow that improperly copies user-controlled data into a fixed-size stack buffer without bounds checking.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
1.6
CVE-2026-86087
SUMMARY

IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 could allow an authenticated user to send a specially crafted request to write arbitrary files on the system.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8