Comparison Overview

Sears

VS

Publix Super Markets

Sears

33 W Monroe Street, Chicago, IL, US, 60603
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

Sears is a leading integrated retailer and provider focused on seamlessly connecting the digital and physical shopping experiences to serve our members - wherever, whenever and however they want to shop. We are part of the Transformco family of brands which operates through its subsidiaries, including Sears Home Services and Kmart, with full-line and specialty retail stores across the United States. We are also home to Shop Your Way®, a social shopping platform offering members rewards for shopping at Sears and Kmart as well as with other retail partners. The company is the nation's largest provider of home services, with more than 14 million service and installation calls made annually. For more information, visit https://jobs.sears.com/.

NAICS: 43
NAICS Definition: Retail Trade
Employees: 26,637
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Publix Super Markets

3300 Publix Corporate Parkway, Lakeland, 33811, US
Last Update: 2025-11-26

Founded in 1930, Publix Super Markets is the largest and fastest-growing employee-owned supermarket chain in the United States. Publix employs over 200,000 associates. We are privately-owned, hold no long-term debt, have avoided layoffs, and continue to grow year after year. Publix and our associates excel in community involvement, volunteerism and environmental sustainability. Having an inclusive working environment makes our company—and our community—better. We value the fresh ideas and unique perspectives that each associate provides. We make it a priority to employ and work with qualified and talented people, which includes associates from many backgrounds, cultures, abilities, and ethnicities.

NAICS: 43
NAICS Definition: Retail Trade
Employees: 84,093
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sears.jpeg
Sears
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/publix-super-markets.jpeg
Publix Super Markets
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Sears
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Publix Super Markets
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Retail Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Sears in 2025.

Incidents vs Retail Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Publix Super Markets in 2025.

Incident History — Sears (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Sears cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Publix Super Markets (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Publix Super Markets cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sears.jpeg
Sears
Incidents

Date Detected: 9/2017
Type:Cyber Attack
Attack Vector: Malicious Script
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/publix-super-markets.jpeg
Publix Super Markets
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Publix Super Markets company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Sears company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Sears company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Publix Super Markets company has not reported any.

In the current year, Publix Super Markets company and Sears company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Publix Super Markets company nor Sears company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Publix Super Markets company nor Sears company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Sears company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while Publix Super Markets company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Sears company nor Publix Super Markets company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Sears nor Publix Super Markets holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Sears company nor Publix Super Markets company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Publix Super Markets company employs more people globally than Sears company, reflecting its scale as a Retail.

Neither Sears nor Publix Super Markets holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Sears nor Publix Super Markets holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Sears nor Publix Super Markets holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Sears nor Publix Super Markets holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Sears nor Publix Super Markets holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Sears nor Publix Super Markets holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H