Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Seagrass Boutique Hospitality GroupSeagrass Boutique Hospitality Group
VS
Minor HotelsMinor Hotels
Seagrass Boutique Hospitality Group

Seagrass Boutique Hospitality Group

Suite102, Level 1, 3 Rider Boulevard, Rhodes, 2138, AU

Last Update: 26/03/2026

View Profile
Between 650 and 699
http://seagrassbhg.com/
654/1000Weak

Seagrass Boutique Hospitality Group specialises in creating superior and innovative Hospitality and Restaurant Concepts for discerning diners. Why Seagrass? In nature, Seagrass is synonymous with sustainability and strength and nurtures all the life surrounding it. Sim...

NAICS:7211
NAICS Definition:Traveler Accommodation
Employees:204
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
Minor Hotels

Minor Hotels

88 The PARQ Building, 12th Fl. Ratchadaphisek Road, Bangkok, Klongtoey, TH, 10110

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.minorhotels.com
807/1000Good

Minor Hotels is a global hospitality leader with over 560 hotels and resorts across six continents, a diverse portfolio of F&B businesses and a selection of luxury transportation services. With over four decades of experience, we build stronger brands, foster lasting pa...

NAICS:7211
NAICS Definition:Traveler Accommodation
Employees:23,861
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Seagrass Boutique Hospitality Group

Seagrass Boutique Hospitality Group

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Minor Hotels

Minor Hotels

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitality Industry Avg (This Year)

Seagrass Boutique Hospitality Group has 34.21% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incidents vs Hospitality Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Minor Hotels in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Seagrass Boutique Hospitality Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Seagrass Boutique Hospitality Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Minor Hotels (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Minor Hotels cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Seagrass Boutique Hospitality Group

Seagrass Boutique Hospitality Group

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
SEA1771302217
Minor Hotels

Minor Hotels

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Seagrass Boutique Hospitality Group company and Minor Hotels company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Seagrass Boutique Hospitality Group company and Minor Hotels company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Seagrass Boutique Hospitality Group company and Minor Hotels company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Seagrass Boutique Hospitality Group company and Minor Hotels company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Seagrass Boutique Hospitality Group company and Minor Hotels company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Seagrass Boutique Hospitality Group company and Minor Hotels company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Seagrass Boutique Hospitality Group company and Minor Hotels company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Seagrass Boutique Hospitality Group company and Minor Hotels company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Seagrass Boutique Hospitality Group company and Minor Hotels company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Seagrass Boutique Hospitality Group company and Minor Hotels company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Seagrass Boutique Hospitality Group company and Minor Hotels company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Seagrass Boutique Hospitality Group and Minor Hotels, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Seagrass Boutique Hospitality Group and Minor Hotels, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Seagrass Boutique Hospitality Group or Minor Hotels ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Seagrass Boutique Hospitality Group or Minor Hotels ?
Between Seagrass Boutique Hospitality Group and Minor Hotels, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Seagrass Boutique Hospitality Group and Minor Hotels, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-66064
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/handler.go sendFile handler opened files using a cleaned path but derived the authorization filename from raw req.URL.Path, so a trailing slash could bypass .goshs ACL-file protection and block-list checks. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-66063
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/updown.go multipart upload handler split part.FileName() on / but did not reject .., allowing an unauthenticated upload with filename .. to create a file outside the served tree. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-64863
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.4, the httpserver/server.go wdGuard handled WebDAV MOVE as a write-only method and did not enforce --no-delete, allowing WebDAV clients to delete or overwrite files via MOVE with Overwrite: T. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-62325
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. From 2.1.3 until 2.1.4, the sftpserver/sftpserver.go password handler used Username != "" && Password != "", so running goshs with -b 'admin:' -sftp and no -fkf left both SFTP authentication handlers unset and allowed unauthenticated file access. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-59921
SUMMARY

Netty is an asynchronous, event-driven network application framework. Prior to versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final, HttpPostRequestEncoder constructs multipart HTTP request bodies by directly concatenating user-supplied filenames and field names into Content-Disposition MIME headers without validating or sanitizing CRLF characters (\r\n). Since MIME headers are delimited by CRLF, an attacker who controls the filename can inject arbitrary MIME headers into the multipart body part. The root cause is that neither the encoder nor the FileUpload implementations' setFilename() methods, which only check for null, neutralize CRLF characters before the filename is embedded into the header. This issue has been fixed in versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1