Comparison Overview
Federal Office for Customs and Border Security FOCBS
Federal Office for Customs and Border Security FOCBS
Taubenstrasse 16, Bern, undefined, 3003, CH
Last Update: 20/01/2026
Around the clock security for Switzerland, 365 days a year. That is what we do each and every day – on the road, in the air and on the water. We combat crime at the border, help protect the environment and the population by checking foodstuffs, medicines, animals and ...
National Park Service
1849 C Street N.W., Washington, D.C., US, 20240
Last Update: 02/04/2026
Most people know that the National Park Service cares for national parks, a network of over 420 natural, cultural and recreational sites across the nation. The treasures in this system – the first of its kind in the world – have been set aside by the American people to ...
Compliance Ranges Comparison
Federal Office for Customs and Border Security FOCBS
National Park Service
Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Federal Office for Customs and Border Security FOCBS in 2026.
Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for National Park Service in 2026.
Incident History - Federal Office for Customs and Border Security FOCBS (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Federal Office for Customs and Border Security FOCBS cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - National Park Service (X = Date, Y = Severity)
National Park Service cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents
Federal Office for Customs and Border Security FOCBS
National Park Service
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to exposure of session tokens in the HTML response.
IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to an XML external entity (XXE) injection flaw.
IBM Aspera Enterprise WebApps 1.0.0 through 1.0.6 could allow a local attacker to obtain sensitive information due to cleartext transmission of sensitive information.
IBM Planning Analytics 2.0, and 2.1 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to a stack-based buffer overflow.
IBM DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data 5.4.0.0 can allow a man-in-the-middle attacker to present a forged TLS certificate, intercept the connection, and capture the IAM bearer Authorization header automatically attached by the session adapter. The captured token grants full platform-scope tenant API access, enabling the attacker to read and manipulate the victim's DataStage projects, flows, assets, and pipeline definitions. This is client-side SDK code running on the user's own machine, so exploitation requires an external network interceptor rather than a co-tenant in the shared cluster.