Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Schwaba GmbHSchwaba GmbH
VS
Freudenberg GroupFreudenberg Group
Schwaba GmbH

Schwaba GmbH

N/A

Last Update: 03/02/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.schwaba.de
747/1000Moderate

Die Schwaba GmbH - 5 Betriebe verteilt in Augsburg und Gersthofen. https://www.schwaba.de/datenschutz Zur Schwaba GmbH gehören die Betriebe Schwaba Augsburg Süd, Schwaba Augsburg Ost, Schwaba Autocenter, Audi Augsburg und SCHWABA Gebrauchtwagenzentrum. Alle Betriebe ...

NAICS:3361
NAICS Definition:Motor Vehicle Manufacturing
Employees:104
Subsidiaries:82
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Freudenberg Group

Freudenberg Group

Höhnerweg 2-4, Weinheim, DE, 69469

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.freudenberg.com/
770/1000Fair

Freudenberg is a global technology group that strengthens its customers and society long-term through forward-looking innovations. Together with its partners, customers and research institutions, the Freudenberg Group develops leading-edge technologies and excellent pro...

NAICS:3361
NAICS Definition:Motor Vehicle Manufacturing
Employees:19,820
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Schwaba GmbH

Schwaba GmbH

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Freudenberg Group

Freudenberg Group

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Motor Vehicle Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Schwaba GmbH in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Motor Vehicle Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Freudenberg Group in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Schwaba GmbH (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Schwaba GmbH cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Freudenberg Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Freudenberg Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Schwaba GmbH

Schwaba GmbH

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Freudenberg Group

Freudenberg Group

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Schwaba GmbH company and Freudenberg Group company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Schwaba GmbH company and Freudenberg Group company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Schwaba GmbH company and Freudenberg Group company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Schwaba GmbH company and Freudenberg Group company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Schwaba GmbH company and Freudenberg Group company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Schwaba GmbH company and Freudenberg Group company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Schwaba GmbH company and Freudenberg Group company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Schwaba GmbH company and Freudenberg Group company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Schwaba GmbH company and Freudenberg Group company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Schwaba GmbH company and Freudenberg Group company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Schwaba GmbH company and Freudenberg Group company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Schwaba GmbH and Freudenberg Group, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Schwaba GmbH and Freudenberg Group, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Schwaba GmbH or Freudenberg Group ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Schwaba GmbH or Freudenberg Group ?
Between Schwaba GmbH and Freudenberg Group, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Schwaba GmbH and Freudenberg Group, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-8325
SUMMARY

A maliciously crafted PDF file, when parsed through Autodesk Revit, can force an Out-of-Bounds Write vulnerability. A malicious actor may leverage this vulnerability to cause a crash, cause data corruption, or execute arbitrary code in the context of the current process.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-06
UPDATED
Date2026-08-06
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-7867
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in udisks2. A local attacker with an active console session can exploit insufficient authorization checking on the 'as-user' option in the org.freedesktop.UDisks2.Filesystem.Mount() D-Bus method. This allows the attacker to spoof the 'as-user' parameter, mounting filesystems on behalf of arbitrary users, including privileged accounts. This can lead to local privilege escalation through mount point injection and manipulation of the mount namespace visible to privileged users.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-06
UPDATED
Date2026-08-06
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-7406
SUMMARY

A maliciously crafted BMP file, when parsed through certain Autodesk products, can force a Untrusted Pointer Dereference vulnerability. A malicious actor can leverage this vulnerability to execute arbitrary code in the context of the current process.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-06
UPDATED
Date2026-08-06
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-7405
SUMMARY

A maliciously crafted TIF file, when parsed through certain Autodesk products during image import, can cause an Out-of-Bounds Read in the image handling library. A malicious actor can leverage this vulnerability to cause a denial of service

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-06
UPDATED
Date2026-08-06
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-71555
SUMMARY

PILOS (Platform for Interactive Live-Online Seminars) is a frontend for BigBlueButton. From 2.1.0 until 4.14.1, PILOS does not send a Cross-Origin-Opener-Policy response header, so pages opened by PILOS via a link that opens a new browsing context (e.g., target="_blank") retain a window.opener reference back to the originating PILOS tab. A malicious destination page reached this way can use window.opener to navigate or manipulate the original PILOS tab, a technique known as reverse tabnabbing, potentially redirecting an authenticated user to a phishing page that mimics PILOS. This issue is fixed in version 4.14.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-06
UPDATED
Date2026-08-06
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.3