Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Schouw & Co.Schouw & Co.
VS
Lincoln FinancialLincoln Financial
Schouw & Co.

Schouw & Co.

Chr. Filtenborgs Plads 1, None, Aarhus, None, DK, 8000

Last Update: 05/02/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.schouw.dk
763/1000Fair

Schouw & Co. is a listed industrial conglomerate founded in 1878 and headquartered in Aarhus, Denmark. We transform leading Danish industrial businesses through value-creating, active and long-term ownership. Our businesses have leading positions in their fields of oper...

NAICS:52
NAICS Definition:Finance and Insurance
Employees:4,198
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Lincoln Financial

Lincoln Financial

150 N. Radnor-Chester Road, Radnor, PA, US, 19087

Last Update: 08/06/2026

View Profile
Between 0 and 549
http://www.LincolnFinancial.com
501/1000Critical

Lincoln Financial (NYSE: LNC) helps people to confidently plan for their version of a successful future. We focus on identifying a clear path to financial security, with products including annuities, investments, life insurance, group protection, and retirement plan ser...

NAICS:52
NAICS Definition:Finance and Insurance
Employees:10,731
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
9
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Schouw & Co.

Schouw & Co.

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Lincoln Financial

Lincoln Financial

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Schouw & Co. in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)

Lincoln Financial has 2.91% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - Schouw & Co. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Schouw & Co. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Lincoln Financial (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Lincoln Financial cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Schouw & Co.

Schouw & Co.

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Lincoln Financial

Lincoln Financial

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
LINLIN1780936450
🔒 Incident : Breach
LIN808072825
🔒 Incident : Breach
LIN016091825

FAQ

Between Schouw & Co. company and Lincoln Financial company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Schouw & Co. company and Lincoln Financial company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Schouw & Co. company and Lincoln Financial company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Schouw & Co. company and Lincoln Financial company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Schouw & Co. company and Lincoln Financial company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Schouw & Co. company and Lincoln Financial company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Schouw & Co. company and Lincoln Financial company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Schouw & Co. company and Lincoln Financial company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Schouw & Co. company and Lincoln Financial company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Schouw & Co. company and Lincoln Financial company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Schouw & Co. company and Lincoln Financial company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Schouw & Co. and Lincoln Financial, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Schouw & Co. and Lincoln Financial, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Schouw & Co. or Lincoln Financial ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Schouw & Co. or Lincoln Financial ?
Between Schouw & Co. and Lincoln Financial, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Schouw & Co. and Lincoln Financial, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-9693
SUMMARY

Mattermost versions 10.11.x <= 10.11.20, 11.7.x <= 11.7.5 Mattermost fails to remove thread membership records when a user is removed from or leaves a team, which allows a previously removed user who is later re-invited to the team to view private channel thread root post content and metadata via the team threads API.. Mattermost Advisory ID: MMSA-2026-00682

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-17
UPDATED
Date2026-08-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
REFERENCES
CVE-2026-75587
SUMMARY

Mattermost Desktop App versions <=6.2 6.2.2.0 fail to redact the pre-auth secret when generating a diagnostics report, which allows a local attacker with access to a user's diagnostics report or log files to obtain the plaintext pre-auth secret configured for a connected server via inspecting the Server Connectivity (Step-3) diagnostics output. Mattermost Advisory ID: MMSA-2026-00716

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-17
UPDATED
Date2026-08-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
REFERENCES
CVE-2026-75078
SUMMARY

A security flaw has been discovered in SourceCodester Class and Exam Timetabling System 1.0. This affects an unknown part of the file /BSHRM1.php. Performing a manipulation of the argument course results in cross site scripting. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. The exploit has been released to the public and may be used for attacks.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-17
UPDATED
Date2026-08-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS2
Base Score: 5.0
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 2.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
REFERENCES
CVE-2026-67961
SUMMARY

An issue in O2OA v.10.0.2 allows a local attacker to execute arbitrary code via the the sandbox mechanism of the Invoke script execution.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-17
UPDATED
Date2026-08-17
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
REFERENCES
CVE-2026-67919
SUMMARY

An issue in Halo 2.25.4 allows a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code via the PluginEndpoint.java, installFromUri method, and DefaultPluginApplicationContextFactory components

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-17
UPDATED
Date2026-08-17
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
REFERENCES