Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Schouw Informatisering from ApteanSchouw Informatisering from Aptean
VS
LexisNexisLexisNexis
Schouw Informatisering from Aptean

Schouw Informatisering from Aptean

Bredaseweg 172, Etten-Leur, Noord-Brabant, 4872 LA, NL

Last Update: 23/12/2025

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
https://aptean.com/nl-NL
749/1000Moderate

"We enable food companies to focus on running and improving their business"​ Sinds 1998 richt Schouw Informatisering, from Aptean zich volledig op het adviseren en automatiseren van bedrijven in de voedingsmiddelenbranche. Ondertussen zijn we uitgegroeid tot een intern...

NAICS:5415
NAICS Definition:Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees:23
Subsidiaries:21
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
LexisNexis

LexisNexis

230 Park Avenue, New York City, 10017, US

Last Update: 05/04/2026

View Profile

LexisNexis is a leading innovator of private, secure, and authoritative Legal AI solutions that help legal and business professionals draft full documents with ease, make informed decisions faster, and deliver outstanding work and improved outcomes, all powered by trust...

NAICS:5415
NAICS Definition:Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees:10,705
Subsidiaries:72
12-month incidents
2
Known data breaches
5
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Schouw Informatisering from Aptean

Schouw Informatisering from Aptean

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
LexisNexis

LexisNexis

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Schouw Informatisering from Aptean in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

LexisNexis has 85.19% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - Schouw Informatisering from Aptean (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Schouw Informatisering from Aptean cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - LexisNexis (X = Date, Y = Severity)

LexisNexis cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Schouw Informatisering from Aptean

Schouw Informatisering from Aptean

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
LexisNexis

LexisNexis

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
RELLEX1772562253
🔒 Incident : Breach
LEX1772555037
🔒 Incident : Breach
LEX1772815548

FAQ

Between Schouw Informatisering from Aptean company and LexisNexis company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Schouw Informatisering from Aptean company and LexisNexis company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Schouw Informatisering from Aptean company and LexisNexis company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Schouw Informatisering from Aptean company and LexisNexis company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Schouw Informatisering from Aptean company and LexisNexis company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Schouw Informatisering from Aptean company and LexisNexis company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Schouw Informatisering from Aptean company and LexisNexis company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Schouw Informatisering from Aptean company and LexisNexis company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Schouw Informatisering from Aptean company and LexisNexis company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Schouw Informatisering from Aptean company and LexisNexis company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Schouw Informatisering from Aptean company and LexisNexis company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Schouw Informatisering from Aptean and LexisNexis, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Schouw Informatisering from Aptean and LexisNexis, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Schouw Informatisering from Aptean or LexisNexis ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Schouw Informatisering from Aptean or LexisNexis ?
Between Schouw Informatisering from Aptean and LexisNexis, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Schouw Informatisering from Aptean and LexisNexis, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-53465
SUMMARY

ImageMagick is free and open-source software used for editing and manipulating digital images. Prior to version 7.1.2-25, a crafted multi-frame can result in a heap buffer over-write when encoding it with the SF3 encoder. This issue has been patched in version 7.1.2-25.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-10
UPDATED
Date2026-06-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.2)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.2
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.5
CVE-2026-53464
SUMMARY

ImageMagick is free and open-source software used for editing and manipulating digital images. Prior to version 7.1.2-25, when providing invalid options to the wand option parser a small memory leak will occur. This issue has been patched in version 7.1.2-25.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-10
UPDATED
Date2026-06-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.5
CVE-2026-53463
SUMMARY

ImageMagick is free and open-source software used for editing and manipulating digital images. Prior to versions 6.9.13-50 and 7.1.2-25, when passing incorrect arguments in the distort operation a null pointer deference will occur. This issue has been patched in versions 6.9.13-50 and 7.1.2-25.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-10
UPDATED
Date2026-06-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-53462
SUMMARY

ImageMagick is free and open-source software used for editing and manipulating digital images. Prior to versions 6.9.13-50 and 7.1.2-25, when an allocation fails in CheckPrimitiveExtent this can result in a heap-use-after-free and result in a crash. This issue has been patched in versions 6.9.13-50 and 7.1.2-25.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-10
UPDATED
Date2026-06-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-53461
SUMMARY

ImageMagick is free and open-source software used for editing and manipulating digital images. Prior to versions 6.9.13-50 and 7.1.2-25, an incorrect loop in the ICON decoder can result in an out of bounds heap write resulting in a crash. This issue has been patched in versions 6.9.13-50 and 7.1.2-25.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-10
UPDATED
Date2026-06-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9