Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Schouw Informatisering from ApteanSchouw Informatisering from Aptean
VS
CapgeminiCapgemini
Schouw Informatisering from Aptean

Schouw Informatisering from Aptean

Bredaseweg 172, Etten-Leur, Noord-Brabant, 4872 LA, NL

Last Update: 23/12/2025

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
https://aptean.com/nl-NL
749/1000Moderate

"We enable food companies to focus on running and improving their business"​ Sinds 1998 richt Schouw Informatisering, from Aptean zich volledig op het adviseren en automatiseren van bedrijven in de voedingsmiddelenbranche. Ondertussen zijn we uitgegroeid tot een intern...

NAICS:5415
NAICS Definition:Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees:23
Subsidiaries:21
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Capgemini

Capgemini

Place de l'Étoile, 11 rue de Tilsitt, Paris, France, FR, 75017

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.capgemini.com
792/1000Fair

Capgemini is an AI-powered global business and technology transformation partner, delivering tangible business value. We imagine the future of organizations and make it real with AI, technology and people. With our strong heritage of nearly 60 years, we are a responsibl...

NAICS:5415
NAICS Definition:Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees:332,481
Subsidiaries:37
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Schouw Informatisering from Aptean

Schouw Informatisering from Aptean

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Capgemini

Capgemini

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Schouw Informatisering from Aptean in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Capgemini in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Schouw Informatisering from Aptean (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Schouw Informatisering from Aptean cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Capgemini (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Capgemini cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Schouw Informatisering from Aptean

Schouw Informatisering from Aptean

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Capgemini

Capgemini

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Schouw Informatisering from Aptean company and Capgemini company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Schouw Informatisering from Aptean company and Capgemini company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Schouw Informatisering from Aptean company and Capgemini company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Schouw Informatisering from Aptean company and Capgemini company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Schouw Informatisering from Aptean company and Capgemini company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Schouw Informatisering from Aptean company and Capgemini company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Schouw Informatisering from Aptean company and Capgemini company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Schouw Informatisering from Aptean company and Capgemini company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Schouw Informatisering from Aptean company and Capgemini company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Schouw Informatisering from Aptean company and Capgemini company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Schouw Informatisering from Aptean company and Capgemini company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Schouw Informatisering from Aptean and Capgemini, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Schouw Informatisering from Aptean and Capgemini, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Schouw Informatisering from Aptean or Capgemini ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Schouw Informatisering from Aptean or Capgemini ?
Between Schouw Informatisering from Aptean and Capgemini, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Schouw Informatisering from Aptean and Capgemini, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-56785
SUMMARY

FlatPress versions prior to commit 10be83c, contains a stored cross-site scripting vulnerability in comment and contact forms where name, URL, and email fields are rendered without proper output encoding in Smarty templates. Attackers can inject arbitrary HTML and JavaScript through these fields to execute malicious scripts in browsers of viewers including administrators, or bypass URL scheme validation to inject javascript: or data: URIs.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-23
UPDATED
Date2026-06-23
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.2)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.2
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:H/VI:L/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
4.7
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-54588
SUMMARY

Poweradmin is a web-based DNS administration tool for PowerDNS server. Versions prior to 4.2.4 and 4.3.3 use the attacker-controlled `HTTP_HOST` request header as the authoritative source for building callback URLs in its OIDC, SAML, and logout authentication flows without any validation. An unauthenticated attacker can poison the `redirect_uri` sent to the Identity Provider, causing the IdP to redirect the victim's authorization code to an attacker-controlled server - resulting in full account takeover with no credentials required. Versions 4.2.4 and 4.3.3 patch the issue.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-23
UPDATED
Date2026-06-23
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-48493
SUMMARY

Snipe-IT is an IT asset/license management system. In versions prior to 8.6.0, a user with only users.edit can send a PATCH to /api/v1/users/{their_own_id} and grant themselves any permission except admin and superuser — for example `assets.view`, `assets.create`, `reports.view`, import, etc. The issue is patched in version 8.6.0.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-23
UPDATED
Date2026-06-23
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4.2
EXPLOITABILITY
1.2
CVE-2026-47693
SUMMARY

Poweradmin is a web-based DNS administration tool for PowerDNS server. Versions prior to 4.2.4 and 4.3.3 are vulnerable to CSV Injection (Formula Injection) in its log export functionality. User-controlled data — specifically the username field — is written to exported CSV files without sanitizing formula trigger characters (=, +, -, @). When an administrator exports activity logs and opens the resulting CSV in a spreadsheet application (Microsoft Excel, LibreOffice Calc, Google Sheets), any formula stored in a username is executed by the application. This can be used for phishing attacks against administrators or data exfiltration. Versions 4.2.4 and 4.3.3 patch the issue.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-23
UPDATED
Date2026-06-23
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4.7
EXPLOITABILITY
1.7
CVE-2026-12164
SUMMARY

Fortra File Integrity Monitoring (FIM), formerly Tripwire Enterprise, versions prior to 9.4.0 may assign incorrect or elevated effective permissions to users created by the tetool import command while FIM is running, particularly when the import also creates or changes roles or role-permission relationships.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-23
UPDATED
Date2026-06-23
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
0.8