Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

The School District of Palm Beach CountyThe School District of Palm Beach County
VS
NIIT LimitedNIIT Limited
The School District of Palm Beach County

The School District of Palm Beach County

3300 Forest Hill Blvd., West Palm Beach, 33406, US

Last Update: 31/03/2026

View Profile
781/1000Fair

The School District of Palm Beach County is the tenth-largest school district in the nation and the fifth-largest in the state of Florida with 180 schools, serving more than 170,000 students. As the largest employer in Palm Beach County, the school district has more th...

NAICS:92311
NAICS Definition:Administration of Education Programs
Employees:17,136
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
NIIT Limited

NIIT Limited

Sector 32, Gurgaon, 122001, IN

Last Update: 04/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.niit.com
796/1000Fair

NIIT Ltd. is a leading skills & talent development corporation, set up in 1981 to help the nascent IT industry overcome its human resource challenges. To meet the manpower challenges in BFSI sector, NIIT established Institute for Finance, Banking, and Insurance (IFBI), ...

NAICS:92311
NAICS Definition:Administration of Education Programs
Employees:14,614
Subsidiaries:9
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
The School District of Palm Beach County

The School District of Palm Beach County

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
NIIT Limited

NIIT Limited

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Education Administration Programs Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The School District of Palm Beach County in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Education Administration Programs Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for NIIT Limited in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - The School District of Palm Beach County (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The School District of Palm Beach County cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - NIIT Limited (X = Date, Y = Severity)

NIIT Limited cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
The School District of Palm Beach County

The School District of Palm Beach County

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
NIIT Limited

NIIT Limited

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between The School District of Palm Beach County company and NIIT Limited company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between The School District of Palm Beach County company and NIIT Limited company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between The School District of Palm Beach County company and NIIT Limited company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between The School District of Palm Beach County company and NIIT Limited company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between The School District of Palm Beach County company and NIIT Limited company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between The School District of Palm Beach County company and NIIT Limited company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between The School District of Palm Beach County company and NIIT Limited company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between The School District of Palm Beach County company and NIIT Limited company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between The School District of Palm Beach County company and NIIT Limited company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between The School District of Palm Beach County company and NIIT Limited company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between The School District of Palm Beach County company and NIIT Limited company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between The School District of Palm Beach County and NIIT Limited, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between The School District of Palm Beach County and NIIT Limited, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - The School District of Palm Beach County or NIIT Limited ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - The School District of Palm Beach County or NIIT Limited ?
Between The School District of Palm Beach County and NIIT Limited, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between The School District of Palm Beach County and NIIT Limited, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-66064
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/handler.go sendFile handler opened files using a cleaned path but derived the authorization filename from raw req.URL.Path, so a trailing slash could bypass .goshs ACL-file protection and block-list checks. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-66063
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/updown.go multipart upload handler split part.FileName() on / but did not reject .., allowing an unauthenticated upload with filename .. to create a file outside the served tree. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-64863
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.4, the httpserver/server.go wdGuard handled WebDAV MOVE as a write-only method and did not enforce --no-delete, allowing WebDAV clients to delete or overwrite files via MOVE with Overwrite: T. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-62325
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. From 2.1.3 until 2.1.4, the sftpserver/sftpserver.go password handler used Username != "" && Password != "", so running goshs with -b 'admin:' -sftp and no -fkf left both SFTP authentication handlers unset and allowed unauthenticated file access. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-59921
SUMMARY

Netty is an asynchronous, event-driven network application framework. Prior to versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final, HttpPostRequestEncoder constructs multipart HTTP request bodies by directly concatenating user-supplied filenames and field names into Content-Disposition MIME headers without validating or sanitizing CRLF characters (\r\n). Since MIME headers are delimited by CRLF, an attacker who controls the filename can inject arbitrary MIME headers into the multipart body part. The root cause is that neither the encoder nor the FileUpload implementations' setFilename() methods, which only check for null, neutralize CRLF characters before the filename is embedded into the header. This issue has been fixed in versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1