Comparison Overview
Schöck België BV

Schöck België BV
Kerkstraat 108, Gentbrugge, 9050, BE
Last Update: 02/04/2026
Schöck België BV is part of the Schöck Bauteile GmbH group and is an international supplier of thermal break elements and anchoring technology. Our innovative building systems have been solving thermal bridges in buildings for over 50 years. Due to the excellent physica...

Andrade Gutierrez S.A.
Avª das Nações Unidas 12495, São Paulo, 04578-000, BR
Last Update: 01/04/2026
Fundada em Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, a Andrade Gutierrez tem reconhecida expertise no segmento de construção pesada. Na década de 1990 iniciou a diversificação dos negócios com investimentos nas áreas de Concessões e Telecomunicações. Hoje o Grupo Andrade Gutier...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Schöck België BV







Andrade Gutierrez S.A.






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Construction Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Schöck België BV in 2026.
Incidents vs Construction Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Andrade Gutierrez S.A. in 2026.
Incident History - Schöck België BV (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Schöck België BV cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Andrade Gutierrez S.A. (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Andrade Gutierrez S.A. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Schöck België BV

Andrade Gutierrez S.A.
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
phpMyFAQ before 4.1.5 contains a privilege escalation vulnerability in GroupController::updatePermissions that allows GROUP_EDIT administrators to grant arbitrary rights to groups without verifying they hold those rights themselves. A delegated administrator can exploit this by assigning high-value permissions to a group they belong to, inheriting those rights and escalating privileges up to full administrative control.
n8n before 2.25.7 and 2.26.x before 2.26.2 contains an abstract syntax tree (AST) security validator bypass in the Python Code node. An authenticated user with permission to create or modify workflows containing a Python Code node can bypass the validator and access the task executor module namespace. The issue only affects self-hosted instances where the Python Task Runner is enabled; where N8N_BLOCK_RUNNER_ENV_ACCESS is configured to allow it, this can disclose environment variables accessible to the task runner process.
Grav CMS before 2.0.0-beta.2 contains multiple code-execution vulnerabilities. Three unsafe unserialize() calls - in Scheduler\JobQueue, Framework\Cache\Adapter\FileCache, and Session - deserialize untrusted data without restricting allowed classes, enabling PHP object injection and, via a gadget chain, arbitrary code execution where an attacker controls the serialized input. Additionally, InstallCommand's git clone operation passes the branch, url, and path parameters into a shell command without escaping, allowing OS command injection via plugin/theme installation (which requires admin access). A Twig security blocklist bypass (server-side template injection) is also present. The issues are fixed in 2.0.0-beta.2.
Storage Concentrator (SC & SCVM) contains a command injection vulnerability within the debug.pl script that is reachable without authentication. A remote attacker can submit a specially crafted HTTP request containing a malicious payload that is processed without adequate input sanitization, resulting in arbitrary command execution with root-level privileges on the underlying system.
Storage Concentrator (SC & SCVM) contains a command injection vulnerability in the ms_service.pl service, which listens on TCP port 9000 by default and accepts custom network packets to perform device actions. An unauthenticated remote attacker can send a specially crafted packet containing a malicious payload that is processed without adequate sanitization, resulting in arbitrary command execution with root-level privileges.