Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

SE Data CentersSE Data Centers
VS
Amazon Web Services (AWS)Amazon Web Services (AWS)
SE Data Centers

SE Data Centers

N/A

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile

About Schneider Electric Schneider’s purpose is to create Impact by empowering all to make the most of our energy and resources, bridging progress and sustainability for all. At Schneider, we call this Life Is On. Our mission is to be the trusted partner in Sustainabili...

NAICS:5415
NAICS Definition:Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees:2
Subsidiaries:21
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Amazon Web Services (AWS)

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

410 Terry Ave N, Seattle, 98019, US

Last Update: 05/08/2026

View Profile
Between 550 and 599
http://aws.amazon.com
594/1000Very Poor

Launched in 2006, Amazon Web Services (AWS) began exposing key infrastructure services to businesses in the form of web services -- now widely known as cloud computing. The ultimate benefit of cloud computing, and AWS, is the ability to leverage a new business model and...

NAICS:5415
NAICS Definition:Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees:148,035
Subsidiaries:95
12-month incidents
22
Known data breaches
4
Attack type number
5

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
SE Data Centers

SE Data Centers

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Amazon Web Services (AWS)

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for SE Data Centers in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

Amazon Web Services (AWS) has 2015.38% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - SE Data Centers (X = Date, Y = Severity)

SE Data Centers cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Amazon Web Services (AWS) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Amazon Web Services (AWS) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
SE Data Centers

SE Data Centers

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Amazon Web Services (AWS)

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
RUB1785673407
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
AMA1782541446
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
HEAAMA1782153018

FAQ

Between SE Data Centers company and Amazon Web Services (AWS) company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between SE Data Centers company and Amazon Web Services (AWS) company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between SE Data Centers company and Amazon Web Services (AWS) company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between SE Data Centers company and Amazon Web Services (AWS) company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between SE Data Centers company and Amazon Web Services (AWS) company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between SE Data Centers company and Amazon Web Services (AWS) company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between SE Data Centers company and Amazon Web Services (AWS) company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between SE Data Centers company and Amazon Web Services (AWS) company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between SE Data Centers company and Amazon Web Services (AWS) company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between SE Data Centers company and Amazon Web Services (AWS) company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between SE Data Centers company and Amazon Web Services (AWS) company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between SE Data Centers and Amazon Web Services (AWS), which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between SE Data Centers and Amazon Web Services (AWS), which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - SE Data Centers or Amazon Web Services (AWS) ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - SE Data Centers or Amazon Web Services (AWS) ?
Between SE Data Centers and Amazon Web Services (AWS), which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between SE Data Centers and Amazon Web Services (AWS), which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-67866
SUMMARY

Buffer Overflow vulnerability in Systerel S2OPC 1.7.3 allows a remote attacker to cause a denial of service via the LockedStaMac_ProcessMsg_DeleteMonitoredItemsResponse and SOPC_StaMac_NewDeleteMonitoredItems in the client wrapper DeleteMonitoredItems path

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-67863
SUMMARY

In open62541 1.5.5, a server-side use-after-free exists in the local MonitoredItem callback path. The issue occurs when UA_Subscription_localPublish continues to use the current UA_Notification after a callback invokes UA_Server_deleteMonitoredItem for the current local MonitoredItem. This allows a remote attacker to cause a denial of service.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-19026
SUMMARY

H5Z__filter_nbit in H5Znbit.c in HDF5 through 2.3.0 dereferences cd_values[0] through cd_values[4] without validating that cd_values is non-NULL or that cd_nelmts is at least 5, the fixed size of the filter's header. This allows attackers to cause a denial of service via a crafted HDF5 file that stores the N-Bit filter pipeline message with zero client-data values, opened and read via H5Dread, e.g. by the h5ls or h5repack tools.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-19025
SUMMARY

H5O__layout_decode in H5Olayout.c in HDF5 through 2.3.0 does not validate that a chunked dataset's stored chunk-layout dimensionality matches its dataspace rank when an existing dataset is opened, whereas this check is performed only at dataset-creation time. This allows attackers to cause a denial of service (divide-by-zero and application crash in H5S__hyper_iter_get_seq_list in src/H5Shyper.c) via a crafted HDF5 file with mismatched chunk/dataspace ranks that is opened and read via H5Dopen2 and H5Dread, e.g. by the h5repack tool.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA