Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Schindler Türkeli Asansör San. A.Ş. (Turkey)Schindler Türkeli Asansör San. A.Ş. (Turkey)
VS
NCCNCC
Schindler Türkeli Asansör San. A.Ş. (Turkey)

Schindler Türkeli Asansör San. A.Ş. (Turkey)

undefined, İstanbul, Barbaros Mah, Ihlamur Bulvarı no:3 K:16 Ataşehir, 34746, TR

Last Update: 02/11/2025

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.schindler.com.tr
777/1000Fair

Schindler Grup, dünya çapında 100'den fazla ülkede faaliyet gösteren, 60,000'den fazla çalışana sahip olan asansör,yürüyen merdiven ve benzeri hizmetler sunan sektöründe lider global bir şirkettir. Dünya çapında hemen her yapı tipi için taşıma sistemlerinin tasarımını, ...

NAICS:23
NAICS Definition:Construction
Employees:294
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
NCC

NCC

Herrjärva Torg 4, Stockholm, Solna, SE, 170 67

Last Update: 05/09/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.ncc.com
758/1000Fair

NCC is one of the leading construction companies in the Nordics. Based on its expertise in managing complex construction processes, NCC contributes to a positive impact of construction for its customers and society. NCC is one of the largest players in the Nordic cons...

NAICS:23
NAICS Definition:Construction
Employees:12,952
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Schindler Türkeli Asansör San. A.Ş. (Turkey)

Schindler Türkeli Asansör San. A.Ş. (Turkey)

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
NCC

NCC

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Construction Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Schindler Türkeli Asansör San. A.Ş. (Turkey) in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Construction Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for NCC in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Schindler Türkeli Asansör San. A.Ş. (Turkey) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Schindler Türkeli Asansör San. A.Ş. (Turkey) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - NCC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

NCC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Schindler Türkeli Asansör San. A.Ş. (Turkey)

Schindler Türkeli Asansör San. A.Ş. (Turkey)

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
NCC

NCC

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Schindler Türkeli Asansör San. A.Ş. (Turkey) company and NCC company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Schindler Türkeli Asansör San. A.Ş. (Turkey) company and NCC company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Schindler Türkeli Asansör San. A.Ş. (Turkey) company and NCC company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Schindler Türkeli Asansör San. A.Ş. (Turkey) company and NCC company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Schindler Türkeli Asansör San. A.Ş. (Turkey) company and NCC company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Schindler Türkeli Asansör San. A.Ş. (Turkey) company and NCC company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Schindler Türkeli Asansör San. A.Ş. (Turkey) company and NCC company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Schindler Türkeli Asansör San. A.Ş. (Turkey) company and NCC company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Schindler Türkeli Asansör San. A.Ş. (Turkey) company and NCC company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Schindler Türkeli Asansör San. A.Ş. (Turkey) company and NCC company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Schindler Türkeli Asansör San. A.Ş. (Turkey) company and NCC company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Schindler Türkeli Asansör San. A.Ş. (Turkey) and NCC, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Schindler Türkeli Asansör San. A.Ş. (Turkey) and NCC, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Schindler Türkeli Asansör San. A.Ş. (Turkey) or NCC ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Schindler Türkeli Asansör San. A.Ş. (Turkey) or NCC ?
Between Schindler Türkeli Asansör San. A.Ş. (Turkey) and NCC, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Schindler Türkeli Asansör San. A.Ş. (Turkey) and NCC, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-86544
SUMMARY

knowns versions before 0.30.0 contain an authorization bypass vulnerability where mutating code actions are incorrectly classified as read-only operations. Attackers with read-restricted sessions can exploit code.replace to modify permission configurations and escalate privileges on subsequent calls.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-07
UPDATED
Date2026-09-07
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 7.2
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-86543
SUMMARY

knowns versions before 0.30.0 serve the management API without authentication on all network interfaces by default, with no password required on fresh installations. Attackers can access the unauthenticated /api/tunnel/start endpoint to provision a public tunnel and republish the API at a publicly accessible address.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-07
UPDATED
Date2026-09-07
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 9.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-86542
SUMMARY

knowns before 0.30.0 fails to validate import names in the import routes, allowing unauthenticated attackers to write files outside the imports directory. Attackers can supply traversal sequences in the name parameter to escape the imports directory and overwrite arbitrary files writable by the server process.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-07
UPDATED
Date2026-09-07
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-86541
SUMMARY

knowns versions before 0.30.0 contain a path traversal vulnerability in the handleCodeReplace() function that allows attackers to overwrite arbitrary files outside the project root. Attackers can supply absolute paths or relative paths containing directory traversal sequences to write malicious content to sensitive files like shell startup scripts or SSH configuration files.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-07
UPDATED
Date2026-09-07
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 7.2
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:L/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
5.5
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-86540
SUMMARY

knowns versions before 0.30.0 fail to validate the settings.lsp.languages binary field in project configuration files, allowing attackers to execute arbitrary binaries by crafting a malicious .knowns/config.json file. When a repository with a crafted configuration is opened, the unvalidated binary path is executed twice under the user's account without any verification.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-07
UPDATED
Date2026-09-07
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8