Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Schindler Türkeli Asansör San. A.Ş. (Turkey)Schindler Türkeli Asansör San. A.Ş. (Turkey)
VS
GMR GroupGMR Group
Schindler Türkeli Asansör San. A.Ş. (Turkey)

Schindler Türkeli Asansör San. A.Ş. (Turkey)

undefined, İstanbul, Barbaros Mah, Ihlamur Bulvarı no:3 K:16 Ataşehir, 34746, TR

Last Update: 02/11/2025

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.schindler.com.tr
777/1000Fair

Schindler Grup, dünya çapında 100'den fazla ülkede faaliyet gösteren, 60,000'den fazla çalışana sahip olan asansör,yürüyen merdiven ve benzeri hizmetler sunan sektöründe lider global bir şirkettir. Dünya çapında hemen her yapı tipi için taşıma sistemlerinin tasarımını, ...

NAICS:23
NAICS Definition:Construction
Employees:294
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
GMR Group

GMR Group

New Udaan Bhawan, New Delhi, 110037, IN

Last Update: 20/05/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.gmrgroup.in
781/1000Fair

GMR Group is a leading Indian infrastructure conglomerate with a diversified presence across Airports, Energy, Transportation, Urban Infrastructure, and Sports. With over two decades of experience, the Group has built world-class assets and pioneered innovations in sust...

NAICS:23
NAICS Definition:Construction
Employees:16,275
Subsidiaries:16
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Schindler Türkeli Asansör San. A.Ş. (Turkey)

Schindler Türkeli Asansör San. A.Ş. (Turkey)

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
GMR Group

GMR Group

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Construction Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Schindler Türkeli Asansör San. A.Ş. (Turkey) in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Construction Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for GMR Group in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Schindler Türkeli Asansör San. A.Ş. (Turkey) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Schindler Türkeli Asansör San. A.Ş. (Turkey) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - GMR Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

GMR Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Schindler Türkeli Asansör San. A.Ş. (Turkey)

Schindler Türkeli Asansör San. A.Ş. (Turkey)

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
GMR Group

GMR Group

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Schindler Türkeli Asansör San. A.Ş. (Turkey) company and GMR Group company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Schindler Türkeli Asansör San. A.Ş. (Turkey) company and GMR Group company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Schindler Türkeli Asansör San. A.Ş. (Turkey) company and GMR Group company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Schindler Türkeli Asansör San. A.Ş. (Turkey) company and GMR Group company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Schindler Türkeli Asansör San. A.Ş. (Turkey) company and GMR Group company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Schindler Türkeli Asansör San. A.Ş. (Turkey) company and GMR Group company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Schindler Türkeli Asansör San. A.Ş. (Turkey) company and GMR Group company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Schindler Türkeli Asansör San. A.Ş. (Turkey) company and GMR Group company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Schindler Türkeli Asansör San. A.Ş. (Turkey) company and GMR Group company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Schindler Türkeli Asansör San. A.Ş. (Turkey) company and GMR Group company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Schindler Türkeli Asansör San. A.Ş. (Turkey) company and GMR Group company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Schindler Türkeli Asansör San. A.Ş. (Turkey) and GMR Group, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Schindler Türkeli Asansör San. A.Ş. (Turkey) and GMR Group, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Schindler Türkeli Asansör San. A.Ş. (Turkey) or GMR Group ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Schindler Türkeli Asansör San. A.Ş. (Turkey) or GMR Group ?
Between Schindler Türkeli Asansör San. A.Ş. (Turkey) and GMR Group, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Schindler Türkeli Asansör San. A.Ş. (Turkey) and GMR Group, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-58523
SUMMARY

Improper access control in Microsoft Edge for Android allows an unauthorized attacker to bypass a security feature over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-03
UPDATED
Date2026-07-03
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-14617
SUMMARY

A security vulnerability has been detected in NousResearch hermes-agent up to 2026.4.30. Affected is the function GatewayStreamConsumer._filter_and_accumulate of the file gateway/stream_consumer.py of the component Streaming Reasoning Tag Filter. The manipulation leads to improper handling of case sensitivity. The attack may be initiated remotely. The attack's complexity is rated as high. The exploitability is told to be difficult. The exploit has been disclosed publicly and may be used. The project decided to not implement a dedicated fix: "[T]he analysis and the fix are both sound. It just lands below the bar for the maintenance cost of a duplicated scrub path."

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-03
UPDATED
Date2026-07-03
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.1)
CVSS2
Base Score: 2.1
Complexity: HIGH
AV:N/AC:H/Au:S/C:P/I:N/A:N
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.1
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 1.3
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
1.6
CVE-2026-58597
SUMMARY

Insufficient ui warning of dangerous operations in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to perform spoofing over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-03
UPDATED
Date2026-07-03
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-58524
SUMMARY

Improper neutralization of input during web page generation ('cross-site scripting') in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to perform spoofing over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-03
UPDATED
Date2026-07-03
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-58522
SUMMARY

Relative path traversal in Microsoft Edge for Android allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information locally.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-03
UPDATED
Date2026-07-03
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.5