Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Schindler Lifts (Pty) Ltd (South Africa)Schindler Lifts (Pty) Ltd (South Africa)
VS
KiewitKiewit
Schindler Lifts (Pty) Ltd (South Africa)

Schindler Lifts (Pty) Ltd (South Africa)

27 Hippo Road, Springfield, undefined, 2190, ZA

Last Update: 25/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.schindler.co.za
753/1000Fair

Schindler Lifts is one of the largest suppliers of new escalators and elevators in Southern Africa and sub-Saharan Africa today. It provides jobs to over 600 employees and has operations throughout all the major cities. Schindler designs, installs, services and modernis...

NAICS:23
NAICS Definition:Construction
Employees:247
Subsidiaries:33
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Kiewit

Kiewit

1550 Mike Fahey St., Omaha, 68102, US

Last Update: 15/09/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://kiewit.com
759/1000Fair

At Kiewit, the projects we deliver make a difference, and we offer opportunities for you to make one, too. Our construction and engineering professionals work on some of the industry’s most complex, challenging and rewarding projects – whether it’s boring tunnels throug...

NAICS:23
NAICS Definition:Construction
Employees:26,728
Subsidiaries:6
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Schindler Lifts (Pty) Ltd (South Africa)

Schindler Lifts (Pty) Ltd (South Africa)

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Kiewit

Kiewit

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Construction Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Schindler Lifts (Pty) Ltd (South Africa) in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Construction Industry Avg (This Year)

Kiewit has 0.99% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - Schindler Lifts (Pty) Ltd (South Africa) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Schindler Lifts (Pty) Ltd (South Africa) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Kiewit (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Kiewit cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Schindler Lifts (Pty) Ltd (South Africa)

Schindler Lifts (Pty) Ltd (South Africa)

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Kiewit

Kiewit

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
KIE1787783299

FAQ

Between Schindler Lifts (Pty) Ltd (South Africa) company and Kiewit company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Schindler Lifts (Pty) Ltd (South Africa) company and Kiewit company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Schindler Lifts (Pty) Ltd (South Africa) company and Kiewit company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Schindler Lifts (Pty) Ltd (South Africa) company and Kiewit company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Schindler Lifts (Pty) Ltd (South Africa) company and Kiewit company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Schindler Lifts (Pty) Ltd (South Africa) company and Kiewit company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Schindler Lifts (Pty) Ltd (South Africa) company and Kiewit company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Schindler Lifts (Pty) Ltd (South Africa) company and Kiewit company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Schindler Lifts (Pty) Ltd (South Africa) company and Kiewit company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Schindler Lifts (Pty) Ltd (South Africa) company and Kiewit company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Schindler Lifts (Pty) Ltd (South Africa) company and Kiewit company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Schindler Lifts (Pty) Ltd (South Africa) and Kiewit, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Schindler Lifts (Pty) Ltd (South Africa) and Kiewit, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Schindler Lifts (Pty) Ltd (South Africa) or Kiewit ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Schindler Lifts (Pty) Ltd (South Africa) or Kiewit ?
Between Schindler Lifts (Pty) Ltd (South Africa) and Kiewit, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Schindler Lifts (Pty) Ltd (South Africa) and Kiewit, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-110873
SUMMARY

Heym from 0.0.55 before 0.0.121 contains a privilege escalation vulnerability that allows shared collaborators to overwrite a workflow's error_workflow_id because the field is missing from OWNER_ONLY_EXECUTION_FIELDS. Attackers can point the error workflow to their own workflow with an HTTP node, and when the parent workflow errors the owner's decrypted credentials are injected and exfiltrated.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-14
UPDATED
Date2026-10-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 7.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
4.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-110872
SUMMARY

Nodemailer from 3.0.0 before 10.0.10 contains a quadratic complexity denial of service vulnerability in the SMTP client reply parser in SMTPConnection._onData and isPartialResponse. A malicious SMTP server or on-path attacker can stream continuation lines without a completion line before authentication, blocking the Node.js event loop and exhausting memory.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-14
UPDATED
Date2026-10-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.2
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-110871
SUMMARY

Nodemailer from 3.0.0 before 10.0.10 contains a denial of service vulnerability in MessageParser.parseHeaders that allows users to exhaust CPU through quadratic header unfolding. Attackers can supply large recipient lists or long headers that fold into tens of thousands of continuation lines, blocking the Node.js event loop during DKIM signing.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-14
UPDATED
Date2026-10-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 7.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-110870
SUMMARY

Nodemailer from 3.0.0 before 10.0.13 contains an improper input validation vulnerability in its address parser that fails to strip RFC 5322 comments inside angle-bracket addresses. Attackers can supply recipients like a display name with a parenthesized comment in the domain, so illegal characters reach envelope.to and RCPT TO, causing rejected delivery or parser interpretation conflicts that bypass domain allow-lists.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-14
UPDATED
Date2026-10-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-110869
SUMMARY

Nodemailer 3.0.0 before 10.0.13 has a regular expression denial of service in SMTPConnection._actionEHLO, whose four AUTH mechanism detection regexes contain overlapping whitespace sub-patterns that backtrack quadratically. A malicious or man-in-the-middle SMTP server can reply to EHLO with 250-AUTH, a long whitespace run and a non-matching token, blocking the Node.js event loop for tens of seconds to hours before authentication.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-14
UPDATED
Date2026-10-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9