Comparison Overview

Schindler Group

VS

Trane Technologies

Schindler Group

Schindler Management, Zugerstrasse 13, Ebikon, CH, 6030
Last Update: 2025-11-23
Between 750 and 799

The Schindler Group is a leading manufacturer and provider of related services for elevators, escalators, and moving walkways. Founded in 1874 in Switzerland, our company is at the forefront of industry innovation, working on pushing the boundaries of technological engineering, while having a strong focus on safety, comfort, efficiency and reliability. Moving more than two billion people each day, our products can be found in many well-known buildings throughout the globe, including office and residential buildings, airports, shopping centers/retail establishments and specialty buildings. We’re a leading employer in the industry, with over 69’000 engaged employees enabling mobility within the urban world. We have a network of over 1000 branch offices in over 100 countries, as well as production sites and research and development facilities in the US, Brazil, Europe, China and India. At Schindler, our mission is to keep the world moving. We Elevate… Our World

NAICS: 3332
NAICS Definition: Industrial Machinery Manufacturing
Employees: 29,563
Subsidiaries: 8
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Trane Technologies

Davidson, US
Last Update: 2025-11-23

Trane Technologies is a global climate innovator advancing sustainability through our leading brands Trane® and Thermo King®, which bring efficient and sustainable climate solutions to buildings, homes and transportation across the globe. Together, we are one team innovating for a better future. At Trane Technologies, we are driven by a common purpose: to boldly challenge what’s possible for a sustainable world. While our products and services work to transform climate control, our company’s goal is to combat climate change. Sustainability is embedded in everything we do. Every team member has an impact on our bold 2030 Sustainability Commitments and is empowered to act and bring solutions to life. Our employee experience sets us apart as a special place to work. We are committed to fostering a culture of inclusivity, innovation and growth. When you join Trane Technologies, you become part of a team that shares a common purpose and values, working together to create a sustainable future. Our core values—Uplift Others, Make an Impact and Thrive at Work and Home—guide us in supporting our community, driving meaningful change and ensuring work-life balance. Explore our career opportunities and join us as we boldly go.

NAICS: 3332
NAICS Definition: Industrial Machinery Manufacturing
Employees: 14,475
Subsidiaries: 13
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/schindler-group.jpeg
Schindler Group
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tranetechnologies.jpeg
Trane Technologies
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Schindler Group
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Trane Technologies
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Industrial Machinery Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Schindler Group in 2025.

Incidents vs Industrial Machinery Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Trane Technologies in 2025.

Incident History — Schindler Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Schindler Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Trane Technologies (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Trane Technologies cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/schindler-group.jpeg
Schindler Group
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tranetechnologies.jpeg
Trane Technologies
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Schindler Group company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Trane Technologies company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Trane Technologies company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Schindler Group company.

In the current year, Trane Technologies company and Schindler Group company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Trane Technologies company nor Schindler Group company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Trane Technologies company nor Schindler Group company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Trane Technologies company nor Schindler Group company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Schindler Group company nor Trane Technologies company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Schindler Group nor Trane Technologies holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Trane Technologies company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Schindler Group company.

Schindler Group company employs more people globally than Trane Technologies company, reflecting its scale as a Industrial Machinery Manufacturing.

Neither Schindler Group nor Trane Technologies holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Schindler Group nor Trane Technologies holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Schindler Group nor Trane Technologies holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Schindler Group nor Trane Technologies holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Schindler Group nor Trane Technologies holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Schindler Group nor Trane Technologies holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H