Comparison Overview

Schindler Group

VS

GEA Group

Schindler Group

Schindler Management, Zugerstrasse 13, Ebikon, CH, 6030
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 750 and 799

The Schindler Group is a leading manufacturer and provider of related services for elevators, escalators, and moving walkways. Founded in 1874 in Switzerland, our company is at the forefront of industry innovation, working on pushing the boundaries of technological engineering, while having a strong focus on safety, comfort, efficiency and reliability. Moving more than two billion people each day, our products can be found in many well-known buildings throughout the globe, including office and residential buildings, airports, shopping centers/retail establishments and specialty buildings. We’re a leading employer in the industry, with over 69’000 engaged employees enabling mobility within the urban world. We have a network of over 1000 branch offices in over 100 countries, as well as production sites and research and development facilities in the US, Brazil, Europe, China and India. At Schindler, our mission is to keep the world moving. We Elevate… Our World

NAICS: 3332
NAICS Definition: Industrial Machinery Manufacturing
Employees: 29,563
Subsidiaries: 8
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

GEA Group

Ulmenstraße 99, Düsseldorf, North Rhine-Westphalia, DE, 40476
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 750 and 799

GEA is one of the largest technology suppliers for food processing and a wide range of other industries. The global group specializes in machinery, plants, as well as process technology and components. GEA provides resource-efficient solutions for sophisticated production processes in diverse end-user markets and offers a comprehensive service portfolio.

NAICS: 3332
NAICS Definition: Industrial Machinery Manufacturing
Employees: 12,794
Subsidiaries: 12
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/schindler-group.jpeg
Schindler Group
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/geagroup.jpeg
GEA Group
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Schindler Group
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
GEA Group
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Industrial Machinery Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Schindler Group in 2025.

Incidents vs Industrial Machinery Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for GEA Group in 2025.

Incident History — Schindler Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Schindler Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — GEA Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

GEA Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/schindler-group.jpeg
Schindler Group
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/geagroup.jpeg
GEA Group
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Schindler Group company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to GEA Group company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, GEA Group company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Schindler Group company.

In the current year, GEA Group company and Schindler Group company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither GEA Group company nor Schindler Group company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither GEA Group company nor Schindler Group company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither GEA Group company nor Schindler Group company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Schindler Group company nor GEA Group company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Schindler Group nor GEA Group holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

GEA Group company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Schindler Group company.

Schindler Group company employs more people globally than GEA Group company, reflecting its scale as a Industrial Machinery Manufacturing.

Neither Schindler Group nor GEA Group holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Schindler Group nor GEA Group holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Schindler Group nor GEA Group holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Schindler Group nor GEA Group holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Schindler Group nor GEA Group holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Schindler Group nor GEA Group holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N